Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Elliot Howard Krevens Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Animals$93kArts & Culture$41kHealth$41kHousing & Shelter$10kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,137
Median grant
3
States reached
$900k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLOCAUST RESOURCE CENTER$4,138
POPCORN PARK ZOO ADDOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETY INCORPORATED$4,138
STONE HARBOR LIONS HOME FOR THE BLIND INC$4,138
THE SEEING EYE INC$4,138
OCEAN CITY HUMANE SOCIETY$4,137
GATEWAY PLAYHOUSE$4,137
CAPE MAY COUNTY PARK & ZOO$4,137
PEARL S BUCK FOUNDATION$2,069
MARINE MAMMAL STRANDING CENTER$2,069
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL$2,069
SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS$2,069
Individual grant recipient$2,068
ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY$2,068
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PEARL S BUCK FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 22%STONE HARBOR LIONS HOME FOR THE BLIND INC: $5k → 10%MARINE MAMMAL STRANDING CENTER: $2k → 11%POPCORN PARK ZOO ADDOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETY INCORPORATED: $5k → 16%PEARL S BUCK FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 22%OCEAN CITY HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 10%HOLOCAUST RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 11%POPCORN PARK ZOO ADDOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETY INCORPORATED: $5k → 16%PEARL S BUCK FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 22%STONE HARBOR LIONS HOME FOR THE BLIND INC: $5k → 10%MARINE MAMMAL STRANDING CENTER: $2k → 11%POPCORN PARK ZOO ADDOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETY INCORPORATED: $4k → 16%OCEAN CITY HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 10%HOLOCAUST RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 11%POPCORN PARK ZOO ADDOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETY INCORPORATED: $4k → 16%STONE HARBOR LIONS HOME FOR THE BLIND INC: $4k → 10%MARINE MAMMAL STRANDING CENTER: $2k → 11%POPCORN PARK ZOO ADDOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETY INCORPORATED: $3k → 16%OCEAN CITY HUMANE SOCIETY: $4k → 10%HOLOCAUST RESOURCE CENTER: $4k → 11%STONE HARBOR LIONS HOME FOR THE BLIND INC: $4k → 10%OCEAN CITY HUMANE SOCIETY: $4k → 10%HOLOCAUST RESOURCE CENTER: $4k → 11%STONE HARBOR LIONS HOME FOR THE BLIND INC: $3k → 10%OCEAN CITY HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 10%HOLOCAUST RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 11%CAPE MAY COUNTY PARK & ZOO: $5k → 10%BIRCH GROVE PARK: $2k → 11%CAPE MAY COUNTY PARK & ZOO: $5k → 10%BIRCH GROVE PARK: $2k → 11%CAPE MAY COUNTY PARK & ZOO: $4k → 10%BIRCH GROVE PARK: $2k → 11%CAPE MAY COUNTY PARK & ZOO: $4k → 10%CAPE MAY COUNTY PARK & ZOO: $3k → 10%ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $2k → 10%GATEWAY PLAYHOUSE: $5k → 11%ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $2k → 10%GATEWAY PLAYHOUSE: $5k → 11%ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $2k → 10%GATEWAY PLAYHOUSE: $4k → 11%GATEWAY PLAYHOUSE: $4k → 11%GATEWAY PLAYHOUSE: $3k → 11%SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2k → 11%SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2k → 11%SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$206k · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$206k
$0

Still filing today

23%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SEEING EYE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $21k · revenue +12%
  • MM
    Marine Mammal Stranding Center
    5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +27%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +12%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    3/3
    Grantees still filing
    3/3
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    HOLOCAUST RESOURCE CENTER: $20,573 · OtherHOLOCAUST RESOURCE CENTERGATEWAY PLAYHOUSE: $20,573 · OtherGATEWAY PLAYHOUSEPOPCORN PARK ZOO ADDOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETY INCORPORATED: $20,573 · OtherPOPCORN PARK ZOO ADDOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETY INCORPORATEDSTONE HARBOR LIONS HOME FOR THE BLIND INC: $20,573 · OtherSTONE HARBOR LIONS HOME FOR THE BLIND INCCAPE MAY COUNTY PARK & ZOO: $20,572 · OtherCAPE MAY COUNTY PARK & ZOOOCEAN CITY HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,572 · OtherOCEAN CITY HUMANE SOCIETYSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,287 · OtherSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALSPEARL S BUCK FOUNDATION: $10,287 · OtherPEARL S BUCK FOUNDATIONANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $10,286 · OtherANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $10,286 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SEEING EYE INC: $20,573 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING …Marine Mammal Stranding Center: $10,287 · AnimalsHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,287 · International
    Other$164,582Human Services$20,573Animals$10,287International$10,287

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $20,573 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMarine Mammal Stranding Center: $10,287 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,287 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
    • Who funds Marine Mammal Stranding Center ↗
    • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Elliot Howard Krevens Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Elliot Howard Krevens Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
    • Marine Mammal Stranding Center: 10% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Elliot Howard Krevens Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Elliot Howard Krevens Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elliot Howard Krevens’ filings →

    More from the funding graph