Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ellen Knowles Harcourt Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$202k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$485kHuman Services$289kEnvironment$133kArts & Culture$115kPublic Safety & Disaster$81kFood & Nutrition$65kAnimals$53kHealth$46kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $132k
$8,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHN PETTIBONE SCHOLARSHIP FUND$30,000
FISH OF NORTHWESTERN CONNECTICUT INC$20,000
TOWN OF NEW MILFORD SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT$15,000
PARTNERS FOR SUSTAINABLE HEALTHY COMMUNITIES$15,000
WATER WITCH HOSE CO NO 2$11,810
NEW MILFORD YOUTH AGENCY$10,000
NORTHWEST CT LAND CONSERVANCY$10,000
AFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM$10,000
MVP SOS FOUNDATION$10,000
CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$8,500
CT ANTIQUE MACHINERY ASSOCIATION$8,000
RENEWAL HOUSE DANBURY$7,500
MERRYALL COMMUNITY CENTER$7,500
SOULFUL SYDNEY INC$7,500
THE SHERMAN PLAYERS$7,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%REGIONAL YMCA OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT: $10k → 9%REGIONAL YMCA OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT: $10k → 9%ABILITY BEYOND: $9k → 9%REGIONAL YMCA OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT: $10k → 9%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $8k → 9%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $8k → 9%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $8k → 9%THRIFT MART OF NEW MILFORD INC: $11k → 9%THRIFT MART OF NEW MILFORD INC: $8k → 9%WHEELS PROGRAM OF GREATER NEW MILFORD: $5k → 9%WHEELS PROGRAM OF GREATER NEW MILFORD: $5k → 9%WHEELS PROGRAM OF GREATER NEW MILFORD: $5k → 9%WHEELS PROGRAM OF GREATER NEW MILFORD: $5k → 9%THRIFT MART OF NEW MILFORD INC: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 40 repeat orgs$233k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
29

Total granted

$1.4M
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+29%

Still filing today

70%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PARTNERS FOR SUSTAINABLE HEALTHY COMMUNITIES INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +552%
  • NV
    NORTHVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
    3× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +21%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $46k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • NM
    NEW MILFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • GV
    GAYLORDSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -9%
  • FC
    FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH - NEW MILFORD
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Newtown Forest Association Inc

The Newtown Forest Association is the oldest private land trust organization in Connecticut. It has been dedicated for one hundred years to securing for the residents of Newtown and for posterity generally the benefits derived from open…

Environment
2
Wyndham Land Trust Inc

Conserve the natural resources of northeast connecticut-the watercourses, swamps, woodlands and open spaces, the plant and animal life therein, and the scenic natural and historic sites.

Environment
3
Winchester Historical Society
—
4
Redding Land Trust Inc

The primary mission of Redding Land Trust is to preserve the natural resources of the Town of Redding, CT and to promote the scientific and educational study of local and natural resources, and to acquire, by gift or purchase, land or…

Environment
5
Northern Connecticut Land Trust Inc

Preserve the natural resources on the northern CT region including agricultural land and other ecologically significant open space.

Environment
6
Candlewood Valley Regional Land Trust

The Candlewood Valley Regional Land Trust protects open spaces that contribute to the Candlewood Valley iconic rural New England character.

—
7
New Milford Economic Development Corporation

The principal objective of the organization is to benefit the community by increasing employment opportunities and the establishment and expansion of business and industry for the citizens of new milford.

Community Improvement
8
Vna Home Inc Co RVNAhealth

The mission of VNA Home, Inc. is to provide short-term or long-term non-medical home care services to people who reside in the greater New Milford, Connecticut area.

—
9
Watertown Land Trust

Preservation of open space in watertown, ct; maintenance of owned and conserved properties and public education of enviromental issues.

—
10
Farmington Land Trust

The Farmington Land Trust Inc protects open space in the town of Farmington CT through the acquisition of open space, stewardship of acquired land, education of the public about the importance of open space and advocacy that ensures…

Environment
11
Burrillville Land Trust

The burrillville land trust is dedicated to maintaining the town's rural character by preserving open space, protecting the beauty and viability of our farms, and preserving the woodlands, meadows, ponds, and rivers around us.

Environment
12
Kestrel Land Trust

Kestrel land trust conserves and cares for forests, farms, and riverways in the connecticut river valley of western massachusetts while nurturing an enduring love of the land

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Connecticut Land Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ripley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/49
Grantees still filing
35/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHN PETTIBONE SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $285,000 · OtherJOHN PETTIBONE SCHOLARSHIP FUNDTOWN OF NEW MILFORD SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $137,000 · OtherTOWN OF NEW MILFORD SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENTTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $70,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER INCFISH OF NORTHWESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $57,500 · OtherFISH OF NORTHWESTERN CONNECTICUT INCNEW MILFORD HIGH SCHOOL: $45,000 · OtherWATER WITCH HOSE CO NO 2: $41,310 · Other+42 more: $425,500 · Other+42 morePARTNERS FOR SUSTAINABLE HEALTHY COMMUNITIES INC: $70,000 · EducationPARTNERS FOR…UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $46,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…MVP SOS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · EducationMVP SOS FOUN…LITERACY VOLUNTEERS ON THE GREEN: $20,325 · EducationLITERACY VOL…LVA SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $8,000 · EducationREGIONAL YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesTHRIFT MART OF NEW MILFORD INC: $22,000 · Human ServicesTHE WHEELS PROGRAM OF GREATER NEW MILFORD INC: $20,400 · Human ServicesABILITY BEYOND DISABILITY INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesFlanders Nature Center & Land Trust Inc: $30,000 · EnvironmentPRATT NATURE CENTER INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentSTEEP ROCK ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentBridgewater Land Trust: $13,250 · EnvironmentNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentWARREN LAND TRUST INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentAFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureSHERMAN PLAYERS INC: $21,300 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureBROOKFIELD CRAFT CENTER INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureTHE INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN INDIAN STUDIES: $7,500 · Arts & CultureTHEATREWORKS NEW MILFORD: $6,000 · Arts & CulturePILOBOLUS INC: $3,950 · Arts & CultureNORTHVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $50,200 · Public Safety & DisasterGAYLORDSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $20,000 · Public Safety & DisasterKENT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $7,500 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $38,500 · Philanthropy
Other$1,061,310Education$174,325Human Services$103,900Environment$103,250Arts & Culture$86,250Public Safety & Disaster$77,700Philanthropy$38,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARTNERS FOR SUSTAINABLE HEALTHY COMMUNITIES INC: $70,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetNORTHVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $50,200 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $46,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $38,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFlanders Nature Center & Land Trust Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM INC: $30,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetMVP SOS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 49% of budgetREGIONAL YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW MILFORD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $24,400 over 3y, 10% of budgetRIPLEY INC: $24,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHRIFT MART OF NEW MILFORD INC: $22,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetSHERMAN PLAYERS INC: $21,300 over 4y, 14% of budgetTHE WHEELS PROGRAM OF GREATER NEW MILFORD INC: $20,400 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS ON THE GREEN: $20,325 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetGirl Scouts of Connecticut Inc: $20,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGAYLORDSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $20,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetLITTLE BRITCHES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $20,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetPRATT NATURE CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetSTEEP ROCK ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHORSE of Connecticut Inc: $17,100 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetNEW MILFORD REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT: $16,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetBridgewater Land Trust: $13,250 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetCAMELLAS CUPBOARD INCORPORATED: $13,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWARREN LAND TRUST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetABILITY BEYOND DISABILITY INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN INDIAN STUDIES: $7,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetKENT VILLAGE HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetMERRYALL COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetKENT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHandy Dandy Handyman Co: $7,500 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetRVNAHEALTH INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATREWORKS NEW MILFORD: $6,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetThe Center For Empowerment And Education Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJULIA'S WINGS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetPILOBOLUS INC: $3,950 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE INC: $3,400 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAVE GIRLS ON FYER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetVNA Northwest Inc: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMALS FOR LIFE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARTNERS FOR SUSTAINABLE HEALTHY COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Flanders Nature Center & Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds AFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds MVP SOS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MILFORD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds RIPLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THRIFT MART OF NEW MILFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds SHERMAN PLAYERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WHEELS PROGRAM OF GREATER NEW MILFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY VOLUNTEERS ON THE GREEN ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc ↗
  • Who funds GAYLORDSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE BRITCHES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds PRATT NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds STEEP ROCK ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HORSE of Connecticut Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SULLIVAN FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MILFORD REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT ↗
  • Who funds Bridgewater Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds CAMELLAS CUPBOARD INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST CONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION FOR THE ARTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Connecticut Community FoundationCT56.2× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Connecticut Community Foundation · Union Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Savings Bank of Danbury Foundation Inc · The Kestrel Foundation · Murray & Susan Haber Charitable Foundation · Northwest Connecticut Community Foundation Inc · Northwest Community Bank Foundation Inc · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · The Diebold Foundation Inc · Albert and Helen Meserve Mem Fund · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ellen Knowles Harcourt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ellen Knowles Harcourt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 180%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Partners for Sustainable Healthy Communities Inc: 68% of income from government
  • The Wheels Program of Greater New Milford Inc: 65% of income from government
  • Steep Rock Association Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
  • Northwest Connecticut Land Conservancy Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Rvnahealth Inc: 2% of income from government
  • After School Arts Program Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Pilobolus Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Little Britches Therapeutic Riding Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Susan B Anthony Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pratt Nature Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
18get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ellen Knowles Harcourt Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Ellen Knowles Harcourt Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ellen Knowles Harcourt’s filings →

More from the funding graph