Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Elijah Fund Inc

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$800
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$400
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Food & Nutrition$1kArts & Culture$998Housing & Shelter$401Human Services$350Religion$350International$300Recreation & Sports$275Health$225
02FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$66
Median grant
4
States reached
$13k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANNA FOOD CENTER$400
ISAIAH HOUSE$67
MAZON$67
TREEHOUSE SHAKERS$66
ARC OF HOWARD COUNTY$50
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MD - HOCO$50
HOWARD COUNTY AUTISM SOCIETY$50
LUBAVITCH CENTER-HOWARD CO$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $150) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARC OF HOWARD COUNTY: $50 → 6%ARC OF HOWARD COUNTY: $50 → 6%ARC OF HOWARD COUNTY: $50 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4k · 10 repeat orgs$275 to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$4k
$275

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MANNA FOOD CENTER INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $900 · revenue +61%
  • HF
    HIGHLIGHTS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $600 · revenue +104%
  • IH
    ISAIAH HOUSE INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $401 · revenue +128%

Funded once

  • AJ
    AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE
    one grant, 2017 · $200
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $75
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Montco Anti-Hunger Network

By leading coordinated action, montco anti-hunger network strengthens the food security safety net system in montgomery county, pa, working to end hunger in montgomery county.

Food & Nutrition
2
International Social Service United States of America Branch Inc

Iss-usa mobilizes a domestic and international network of social work, legal, and other professionals to connect children, adults and families separated by borders with the services and support they need.

Human Services
3
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
4
Abilities Network Inc

Cultivating inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.

Health
5
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
6
Moveable Feast Inc

Moveable feast's mission is to improve the health of marylanders experiencing food insecurity and chronic illness by preparing and delivering medically tailored meals and providing nutrition education, thereby achieving racial, social, and…

—
7
Metropolitan Area Neighborhood Nutrition Alliance

Manna uses nutrition to improve health for people with serious illnesses who need nourishment to heal. by providing medically tailored meals and nutrition education, we empower people to improve their health and quality of life.

Food & Nutrition
8
Healthcare Access Maryland Inc

We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.

Health
9
Housing Unlimited Inc

Housing unlimited, inc. is a non-profit dedicated to providing affordable, permanent housing opportunities and independent living for adults in mental health recovery.

Housing & Shelter
10
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
11
Meals On Wheels of Central Marylandinc

Meals on wheels of central maryland's charitable mission, to keep homebound people living safely and independently at home through the provision of nutritious meals, personal contact and support services, reduces hospitalization, and…

Food & Nutrition
12
Anne Arundel County Casa Inc

Advocate for and support abused and neglected children to ensure their right to safe, stable and permanent homes.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc of Howard County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Treehouse Shakers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HIGHLIGHTS FOUNDATION INC: $600 · OtherHIGHLIGHTS FOUNDATION INCISAIAH HOUSE INC: $401 · OtherISAIAH HOUSE INCLUBAVITCH CENTER-HOWARD CO: $275 · OtherLUBAVITCH CENTER-HOWARD COSPECIAL OLYMPICS MD - HOCO: $275 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS MD - HOCOMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $201 · OtherMAZON A Jewish Response to HungerAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $200 · OtherAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICEIndividual grant recipient: $75 · OtherMANNA FOOD CENTER INC: $900 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD CENTER INCTreehouse Shakers Inc: $398 · Arts & CultureTreehouse S…HIAS INC: $300 · InternationalAUTISM SOCIETY OF MARYLAND INC: $225 · HealthTHE ARC OF HOWARD COUNTY INC: $150 · Human Services
Other$2,027Food & Nutrition$900Arts & Culture$398International$300Health$225Human Services$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMANNA FOOD CENTER INC: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLIGHTS FOUNDATION INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISAIAH HOUSE INC: $401 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTreehouse Shakers Inc: $398 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHIAS INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF MARYLAND INC: $225 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $201 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF HOWARD COUNTY INC: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MANNA FOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLIGHTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ISAIAH HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Treehouse Shakers Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SOCIETY OF MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF HOWARD COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Elijah Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Elijah Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Autism Society of Maryland Inc: 67% of income from government
  • Isaiah House Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Manna Food Center Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Elijah’s filings →

More from the funding graph