Skip to content
The Education and Research Foundation for Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Education and Research Foundation for Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging

Our mission is to advance healthcare by provision of grants and awards in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging.

$414k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$191k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.6MScience & Tech$494kEducation$50kPhilanthropy$25k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $342,921, the rows itemized in this filing. The $414,171 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $71,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $48k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $295k
$54,399
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINING$190,583
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE$54,399
NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION$50,000
SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES$47,939
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 21% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE NEUROINDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH: $50k → 16%HIGH COUNTRY NUCLEAR MEDICINE CONFERENCE: $4k → 7%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $50k → 10%SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES: $48k → 10%THE GOLDENBERG FAMILY FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS: $50k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $50k → 10%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND: $272k → 6%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $50k → 19%THE NEUROINDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH: $50k → 16%SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES: $17k → 10%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND: $268k → 6%THE NEUROINDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH: $50k → 16%SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES: $11k → 10%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING: $268k → 6%NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50k → 16%SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL: $10k → 10%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINING: $231k → 6%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $100k → 16%SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES: $10k → 10%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINING: $226k → 6%SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES: $6k → 10%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINING: $202k → 6%SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES: $2k → 10%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINING: $201k → 6%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINING: $194k → 6%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINING: $191k → 6%BENEDICT CASSEN PRIZE: $75k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE: $54k → 6%BENEDICT CASSEN PRIZE: $50k → 6%BENEDICT CASSEN FELLOWSHIP: $50k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR: $17k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE: $13k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE: $11k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE: $10k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE: $10k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR: $9k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE: $8k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
WI
MA
CA
MO
VA
MD
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 5 repeat orgs$529k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
11

Total granted

$2.6M
$529k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
0%

Still filing today

80%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SOCIETY OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +93%
  • NT
    NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2025 · $200k · revenue +66%
  • AC
    AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $132k · revenue +36% · 38% of their budget

Funded once

  • MG
    MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • UO
    University of Wisconsin Madison
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOCIETY OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING: $2,052,419 · HealthSOCIETY OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINGNEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $200,000 · HealthNEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $125,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES: $105,364 · OtherSOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACE…MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $100,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HO…University of Wisconsin Madison: $50,000 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin …Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…McMaster University: $50,000 · OtherMcMaster UniversityREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $50,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSIT…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS: $50,000 · OtherWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST…MCMASTER UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherMCMASTER UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…+1 more: $4,000 · OtherAMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE: $132,418 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationThe Goldenberg Family Foundation: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Health$2,252,419Other$684,364Education$182,418Philanthropy$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOCIETY OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING: $2,052,419 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetNEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE: $132,418 over 8y, 38% of budgetSOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES: $105,364 over 7y, 6.2% of budgetMcMaster University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Goldenberg Family Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOCIETY OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING ↗
  • Who funds NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds McMaster University ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Goldenberg Family Foundation ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Education and Research Foundation for Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Education and Research Foundation for Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Education and Research Foundation for Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home