Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Education and Research Foundation for Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging

Our mission is to advance healthcare by provision of grants and awards in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging.

$414k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$191k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$2.3MEducation$182kPhilanthropy$25kOther$684k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $342,921 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $414,171 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $71,250 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $48k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $295k
$54,399
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINING$190,583
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE$54,399
NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION$50,000
SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES$47,939
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 21% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50k → 16%HIGH COUNTRY NUCLEAR MEDICINE CONFERENCE: $4k → 7%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $50k → 10%SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES: $48k → 10%THE GOLDENBERG FAMILY FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS: $50k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $50k → 10%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND: $272k → 6%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $50k → 19%THE NEUROINDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH: $50k → 16%SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES: $17k → 10%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND: $268k → 6%THE NEUROINDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH: $50k → 16%SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES: $11k → 10%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING: $268k → 6%THE NEUROINDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH: $50k → 16%SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL: $10k → 10%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINING: $231k → 6%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $100k → 16%SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES: $10k → 10%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINING: $226k → 6%SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES: $6k → 10%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINING: $202k → 6%SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES: $2k → 10%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINING: $201k → 6%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINING: $194k → 6%SOC OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINING: $191k → 6%BENEDICT CASSEN PRIZE: $75k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE: $54k → 6%BENEDICT CASSEN FELLOWSHIP: $50k → 6%BENEDICT CASSEN PRIZE: $50k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR: $17k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE: $13k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE: $11k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE: $10k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE: $10k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR: $9k → 6%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE: $8k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
WI
MA
CA
MO
VA
MD
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.6M · 5 repeat orgs$529k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
11

Total granted

$2.6M
$529k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
0%

Still filing today

80%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SOCIETY OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +66%
  • NT
    NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2025 · $200k · revenue +66%
  • AC
    AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $132k · revenue +36% · 38% of their budget

Funded once

  • MG
    MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • MU
    MCMASTER UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOCIETY OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING — $2,052,419 · HealthSOCIETY OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGINGNEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $200,000 · HealthNEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $125,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES — $105,364 · OtherSOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACE…MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL — $100,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HO…Individual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…MCMASTER UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · OtherMCMASTER UNIVERSITYMcMaster University — $50,000 · OtherMcMaster UniversityREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $50,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSIT…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS — $50,000 · OtherWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST…University of Wisconsin Madison — $50,000 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin …Individual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…+1 more — $4,000 · OtherAMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE — $132,418 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · EducationThe Goldenberg Family Foundation — $25,000 · Philanthropy
Health$2,252,419Other$684,364Education$182,418Philanthropy$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOCIETY OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING — $2,052,419 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetNEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE — $132,418 over 8y, 38% of budgetSOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES — $105,364 over 7y, 6.2% of budgetMcMaster University — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Goldenberg Family Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOCIETY OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING ↗
  • Who funds NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds McMaster University ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Goldenberg Family Foundation ↗

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Education and Research Foundation for Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines