Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Earl & Shirley Greif Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$305k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.7MEnvironment$275kCivil Rights$170kPublic Safety & Disaster$75kPhilanthropy$70kHealth$60kInternational$50kEducation$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Holocaust Education Center of the D$150,000
Natural Resources Defense Council$50,000
Santa Barbara Museum of Art$25,000
Kaleidoscope Chamber Orchestra$15,000
KCRW$15,000
Doctors Without Borders$10,000
American Red Cross$10,000
City of Hope$10,000
Anti-Defamation League$5,000
Museum of Contempory Art MOCA$5,000
Hebrew University In Jerusalem$5,000
National Alliance on Mental Illness$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Holocaust Education Center in the D: $265k → 11%KCRW: $20k → 14%Santa Barbara Museum of Art: $25k → 14%National Resources Defense Council: $50k → 17%CDC Foundation: $25k → 13%Holocaust Education Center in the D: $200k → 11%KCRW: $15k → 14%The Resonance Foundation: $150k → 14%Natural Resources Defense Council: $50k → 17%Holocaust Education Center of the D: $150k → 11%KCRW: $15k → 14%Santa Barbara Museum of Art: $25k → 14%Natural Resources Defense Council: $50k → 17%Tolerance Education Center of the D: $75k → 11%KCRW: $15k → 14%National Resources Defense Council: $50k → 17%Holocaust Education Center in the D: $50k → 11%KCRW: $15k → 14%Natural Resources Defense Council: $25k → 17%Tolerance Education Center of the D: $50k → 11%KCRW: $15k → 14%Natural Resources Defense Council: $25k → 17%The Resonance Foundation: $170k → 11%KCRW: $10k → 14%Natural Resources Defense Council: $25k → 17%The Resonance Foundation: $150k → 11%The Museum of Contemporary Art: $50k → 14%The Museum of Contemporary Art: $50k → 14%Museum of Contempory Art MOCA: $50k → 14%Doctors Without Borders: $10k → 17%The Museum of Contemporary Art: $25k → 14%Museum of Contempory Art MOCA: $25k → 14%The Museum of Contemporary Art: $25k → 14%Long Beach Opera: $15k → 14%American Red Cross Los Angeles: $25k → 14%American Red Cross Los Angeles: $10k → 14%City of Hope: $10k → 14%City of Hope: $10k → 14%City of Hope: $10k → 14%City of Hope: $10k → 14%City of Hope: $10k → 14%City of Hope: $10k → 14%City of Hope: $10k → 14%Kaleidoscope Chamber Orchestra: $15k → 14%Kaleidoscope Chamber Orchestra: $10k → 14%Los Angeles County Museum of Art: $55k → 14%Los Angeles County Museum of Art: $25k → 14%Los Angeles County Museum of Art: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 20 repeat orgs$178k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
2

Total granted

$2.2M
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+291%

Still filing today

55%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEnvironmentCivil RightsHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $275k · revenue +37%
  • TM
    THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES
    4× · 2018–2021 · $150k · revenue +74%
  • MA
    MUSEUM ASSOCIATES
    3× · 2018–2020 · $105k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • NF
    NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -35%
  • NL
    Nine Lives Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +291%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
2
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
3
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
4
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
5
Metropolitan Museum of Art

The metropolitan museum of art collects, studies, conserves, and presents significant works of art across all times and cultures in order to connect people to creativity, knowledge, and ideas.

Arts & Culture
6
The National Museum of Women in the Arts

The mission of the national museum of women in the arts is to collect, conserve and elevate the achievements of women artists from all nationalities and to educate the public on their outstanding accomplishments. we strive to accomplish…

—
7
Oakland Museum of California

The museum's mission is to inspire all californians to create a more vibrant future for themselves and their communities. through collections, exhibitions, education programs, and public dialogue, we inspire people of all ages and…

Arts & Culture
8
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
9
Los Angeles International Dance Festival
—
10
Apex Art Curatorial Program Inc

Apex Art Curatorial Program is a resolutely noncommercial visual art exhibition space which provides curators and artists with a venue dedicated to ideas that are often too provocative or too small in scope for display elsewhere. Apex Art…

Arts & Culture
11
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
12
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Museum of Contemporary Art Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is Kaleidoscope Chamber Orchestra. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Holocaust Education Center in the D: $515,000 · OtherHolocaust Education Center in the DHolocaust Education Center of the D: $150,000 · OtherHolocaust Education Center of the DTolerance Education Center of the D: $125,000 · OtherTolerance Education Center of the DKCRW: $105,000 · OtherKCRWMuseum of Contempory Art MOCA: $80,000 · OtherMuseum of Contempory Art MOCACity of Hope: $70,000 · OtherCity of HopeSanta Barbara Museum of Art: $50,000 · Other+3 more: $65,000 · Other+3 moreResonance Foundation: $470,000 · Arts & CultureResonance FoundationTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $150,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS AN…MUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $105,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSOCIATESKALEIDOSCOPE CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $42,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $42,500 · Arts & CultureNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $275,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESO…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $50,000 · InternationalANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $45,000 · Civil RightsAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $40,000 · Human ServicesNAMI National: $35,000 · HealthWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK: $5,000 · HealthNine Lives Foundation: $2,500 · Animals
Other$1,160,000Arts & Culture$810,000Environment$275,000International$50,000Civil Rights$45,000Human Services$40,000Health$40,000Animals$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetResonance Foundation: $470,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $275,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $150,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $45,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKALEIDOSCOPE CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $42,500 over 6y, 14% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONG BEACH OPERA: $17,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNine Lives Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Resonance Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds KALEIDOSCOPE CHAMBER ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds LONG BEACH OPERA ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Nine Lives Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Earl & Shirley Greif Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Earl & Shirley Greif Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Earl & Shirley Greif’s filings →

    More from the funding graph