Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Durham Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.8M
Granted FY2023
30
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$2.3M
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Philanthropy$4.5MArts & Culture$268kHealth$166kHuman Services$165kEducation$150kFood & Nutrition$126kAnimals$82kEmployment$36kOther$0
02FY2023 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k24 grants · $97k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $37k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+2 grants · $4.5M
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE COMMUNITY FDN INCSHIVEL$2,260,715
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCDAVENPORT$2,260,472
BYRD THEATRE FOUNDATION$100,000
ELIJAH HOUSE ACADEMY$17,225
LANDING SCHOOL OF BOATBUILDING & DESIGN$10,000
LA LECHE LEAGUE ALLIANCE$10,000
NORTHERN NECK OF VIRGINIA FOOD BANK$8,500
CENTRAL VIRGINIA FOOD BANK$8,500
TAMPA PREPARATORY SCHOOL$7,500
RICHMOND CNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$6,450
NORTHERN NECK VOCATIONAL CENTER$6,000
CARITAS$6,000
MAYMONT FOUNDATION$6,000
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION$5,000
SOLDIER'S BEST FRIEND$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%THE CAMERON K GALLAGHER FDN: $10k → 6%THE CAMERON K GALLAGHER FDN: $10k → 6%CAMERON K GALLAGHER FDN: $5k → 6%CAMERON K GALLAGHER FDN: $5k → 6%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $5k → 22%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $5k → 22%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $5k → 22%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $5k → 22%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $2k → 22%VIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS & GIRLS: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
CT
CA
UT
VA
MD
AZ
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 60 repeat orgs$4.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

60 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2023, 33 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
9

Total granted

$1.1M
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+23%

Still filing today

50%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    The Byrd Theatre Foundation
    5× · 2019–2023 · $165k · revenue +123%
  • EH
    ELIJAH HOUSE ACADEMY
    5× · 2019–2023 · $72k · revenue +91%
  • FM
    FEED MORE INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $61k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • TV
    The Virginia Home
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +23%
  • VT
    VIRGINIA TECH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • VH
    VIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bon Secours - Richmond Health System Inc

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

Health
2
Vcu Health Tappahannock Hospital

To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.

Health
3
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
4
Carilion Clinic

Our mission is to improve the health of the communities we serve through our commitment to a common purpose of better patient care, better community health, and lower cost.

Health
5
Virginia Tech Foundation Inc

Virginia tech foundation, inc. (vtf) is a virginia nonstock corporation established in 1948 for the sole purpose of managing virginia tech's endowment to advance virginia tech's mission and its strategic priorities.

Education
6
Carilion Services Inc

Our mission is to improve the health of the communities we serve through our commitment to a common purpose of better patient care, better community health, and lower cost.

Health
7
Carilion Medical Center

Our mission is to improve the health of the communities we serve through our commitment to a common purpose of better patient care, better community health, and lower cost.

Health
8
William & Mary Foundation

The William & Mary Foundation advances the university's highest aspirations by securing private support, guiding a multi-asset investment portfolio, and offering strategic leadership. In this work, we propel the university toward national…

Education
9
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
10
Claiborne Medical Center

Claiborne Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
11
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
12
James Barry Robinson Institute

The Barry Robinson Center offers programs to improve the lives of children and their families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Richmond Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; the most unlike its peers is Liftpd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
25/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE COMMUNITY FDN INCSHIVEL: $2,260,715 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY FDN INCSHIVELCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCDAVENPORT: $2,260,472 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCDAVENPORT+46 more: $645,925 · Other+46 moreThe Byrd Theatre Foundation: $165,000 · Arts & CultureMAYMONT FOUNDATION: $38,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $6,000 · Arts & CultureThe Cameron K Gallagher Foundation: $30,000 · Human ServicesSOLDIERS BEST FRIEND: $27,000 · Human ServicesCOMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $22,000 · Human ServicesVIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $10,000 · Human ServicesLIFTPD: $20,000 · HealthTHE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC: $15,500 · HealthVCU Health Childrens Services at Brook Road: $15,000 · HealthSHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION: $13,000 · HealthThe Virginia Home: $10,000 · HealthLEGAL INFORMATION NETWORK FOR CANCER: $10,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF RICHMOND: $4,000 · HealthFEED MORE INC: $61,000 · Food & NutritionBRANDON ACADEMY PTO INC: $23,000 · EducationTAMPA PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $17,500 · EducationTHE FAISON CENTER INC: $10,000 · EducationTHE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $7,000 · EducationST MARGARET'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $3,500 · EducationRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $23,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $20,000 · AnimalsLowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc: $8,000 · AnimalsThe Florida Aquarium Inc: $8,000 · Animals
Other$5,167,112Arts & Culture$209,000Human Services$89,000Health$87,500Food & Nutrition$61,000Education$61,000Animals$59,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Byrd Theatre Foundation: $165,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetELIJAH HOUSE ACADEMY: $72,225 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetFEED MORE INC: $61,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMAYMONT FOUNDATION: $38,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cameron K Gallagher Foundation: $30,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetSOLDIERS BEST FRIEND: $27,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCARITAS: $26,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBRANDON ACADEMY PTO INC: $23,000 over 5y, 8.5% of budgetRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $23,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $22,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Landing School of Boatbuilding & Design: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIFTPD: $20,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetTAMPA PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC: $15,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVCU Health Childrens Services at Brook Road: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Virginia Home: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAISON CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL INFORMATION NETWORK FOR CANCER: $10,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetVIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Florida Aquarium Inc: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Museum of Richmond: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTUCKAHOE VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF RICHMOND: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE SUPPORT SERVICES OF THE NORTHERN NECK INC: $4,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetST MARGARET'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRISE TAMPA OUR POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Byrd Theatre Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ELIJAH HOUSE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds FEED MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYMONT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Cameron K Gallagher Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SOLDIERS BEST FRIEND ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS ↗
  • Who funds BRANDON ACADEMY PTO INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds The Landing School of Boatbuilding & Design ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LIFTPD ↗
  • Who funds TAMPA PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VCU Health Childrens Services at Brook Road ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Virginia Home ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA30.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · Herndon Foundation · Commonwealth Foundations · Richard S Reynolds Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Peachtree House Foundation · Wilbur Moreland Havens Charitable Foundation · The Garrett Foundation · The Anne C Robins & Walter R Robins Jr Foundation · Massey Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Durham Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Durham Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Florida Aquarium Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Durham’s filings →

More from the funding graph