Skip to content
The Druskin Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Druskin Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$301kHealth$33kHuman Services$22kFood & Nutrition$20kPhilanthropy$10kAnimals$5kArts & Culture$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEDMINSTER TOWNSHIP PBA #366 INC$1,000
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%LIFECAMP: $20k → 4%SOMERSET HILLS YMCA: $750 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$329k · 5 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
16

Total granted

$329k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+29%

Still filing today

80%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    Foundation for Morristown Medical Center
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +30%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +8%
  • Somerset County Young Men's Christian Association Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • LC
    LIFE CAMP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +99%
  • HM
    Hackensack Meridian Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CF
    Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
South Jersey Aquatic Club

The mission of sjac is to provide quality recreational and competitive swim instruction and teach overall water safety skills to all members of the community, regardless of age or ability. the long-term focus is life-long development of…

Recreation & Sports
5
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
6
St Joseph's Health System Subordinate Group Return

We are committed to providing exceptional quality care which sustains and improves both individual and community health, with a special concern for those who are poor, vulnerable and underserved.

—
7
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
8
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
9
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
12
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Brick Twp Police Athletic League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $300,000 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONLIFE CAMP INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesLIFE CAMP…GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING E…Somerset County Young Men's Christian Association Inc: $1,250 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesHackensack Meridian Foundation: $10,000 · OtherHackensac…COMMUNITY FOODBANK OF NEW JERSEY (CFBNJ): $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY…ST HUBERT'S ANIMAL WELFARE CENTER: $4,000 · OtherST HUBERT…POTTERSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $2,000 · OtherPOTTERSVI…+7 more: $6,000 · Other+7 moreFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $20,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $10,000 · Food & NutritionThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $4,000 · Arts & CultureNew Jersey Audubon Society: $1,000 · EnvironmentBRICK TWP POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $1,000 · Youth Development
Education$300,000Human Services$32,250Other$32,000Health$21,500Food & Nutrition$10,000Arts & Culture$4,000Environment$1,000Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE CAMP INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOTTERSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSomerset County Young Men's Christian Association Inc: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOMERSET CTY ASSN OF CHIEFS OF POLICE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Jersey Audubon Society: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRICK TWP POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Druskin Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Druskin Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Somerset County Young Men's Christian Association Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Life Camp Inc: 4% of income from government
  • New Jersey Audubon Society: 1% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Druskin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home