Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dr Adele V Deckinger Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$88k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$175kEducation$141kCrime & Legal$38kFood & Nutrition$28kHuman Services$21kHousing & Shelter$5kArts & Culture$5kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$630k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY$25,000
EXTRAORDINARY PEOPLE IN CARE$15,000
EXTRAORDINARY PEOPLE IN CARE$10,000
ST JOHNS UNIVERSITY$5,000
EXTRAORDINARY PEOPLE IN CARE$3,500
MEALS ON WHEELS$2,500
FEEDING WESTCHESTER$2,500
SANDY HOOK PROMISE$2,500
HOUR CHILDREN$2,500
SERVICES FOR THE UNDERSERVED$2,000
COMMUNIDAD LATINX INC$2,000
FEEDING WESTCHESTER$2,000
HOUR CHILDREN$1,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHONA SOCIETY INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOUR CHILDREN: $5k → 13%HOUR CHILDREN: $5k → 13%HOUR CHILDREN: $5k → 13%HOUR CHILDREN: $3k → 13%HOUR CHILDREN: $3k → 13%HOUR CHILDREN: $2k → 13%HOUR CHILDREN: $2k → 13%HOUR CHILDREN: $2k → 13%HOUR CHILDREN: $2k → 13%HOUR CHILDREN: $1k → 13%HOUR CHILDREN: $1k → 13%HOUR CHILDREN: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$410k · 17 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$410k
$3k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCrime & LegalEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $141k · revenue +4%
  • HC
    HOUR CHILDREN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $28k · revenue +5%
  • FW
    FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • SS
    SOUTH SHORE CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities Inc

American lebanese syrian associated charities, inc. (alsac) was founded in 1957 and exists solely to raise funds and build awareness to sustain and grow the mission of st. jude children's research hospital, inc. to advance cures, and means…

Religion
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
St Joseph's Health System Subordinate Group Return

We are committed to providing exceptional quality care which sustains and improves both individual and community health, with a special concern for those who are poor, vulnerable and underserved.

—
7
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
8
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
9
Virtua Medical Group Pa

The physicians of virtua medical group (vmg) share a common philosophy in all they do: to create an outstanding experience for patients. in a broad range of specialties, from family medicine to surgery to oncology, vmg's highly-trained…

Health
10
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
11
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
12
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Navis Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EXTRAORDINARY PEOPLE IN CARE: $141,000 · OtherEXTRAORDINARY PEOPLE IN CARECOMMUNIDAD LATINX INC: $16,000 · OtherCOMMUNIDAD LATINX INCFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $14,500 · OtherFEEDING WESTCHESTER INCMEALS ON WHEELS: $13,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS+8 more: $34,000 · Other+8 moreST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $140,500 · EducationST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORKHOUR CHILDREN INC: $28,000 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $11,000 · HealthADULT CONGENITAL HEART ASSOCIATION: $4,500 · HealthNAVIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthQUEENS LAW ASSOCIATES NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION: $6,500 · Crime & LegalSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Crime & LegalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,500 · International
Other$218,500Education$140,500Human Services$28,000Health$16,500Crime & Legal$10,000International$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $140,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOUR CHILDREN INC: $28,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $14,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetQUEENS LAW ASSOCIATES NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICES FOR THE UNDERSERVED INC: $5,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetADULT CONGENITAL HEART ASSOCIATION: $4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds HOUR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds QUEENS LAW ASSOCIATES NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SERVICES FOR THE UNDERSERVED INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds ADULT CONGENITAL HEART ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds NAVIS FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dr Adele V Deckinger Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dr Adele V Deckinger Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dr Adele V Deckinger Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph