Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Donovan Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$108k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Arts & Culture$119kReligion$27kHealth$22kHousing & Shelter$19kCommunity Improvement$10kFood & Nutrition$6kInternational$4kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $108k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY$107,650
LISTENING THE BARRE INTEGRATED HEALTH CENTER$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE STONE CHURCH INC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%TRI-PARISH CHURCH: $2k → 11%QUABOAG VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10k → 12%SISTERS FOR PEACE: $10k → 12%TRI-PARISH CHURCH: $1k → 11%WORKSHOP 13: $3k → 12%SISTERS FOR PEACE: $3k → 12%TRI-PARISH CHURCH: $500 → 11%AGAPE COMMUNITY: $2k → 12%SISTERS FOR PEACE: $500 → 12%LISTENING THE BARRE INTEGRATED HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 11%AGAPE COMMUNITY: $2k → 12%LISTENING THE BARRE INTEGRATED HEALTH CENTER: $7k → 11%WORKSHOP 13: $2k → 12%LISTENING THE BARRE INTEGRATED HEALTH CENTER: $5k → 11%WORKSHOP 13: $1k → 12%LISTENING THE BARRE INTEGRATED HEALTH CENTER: $500 → 11%WORKSHOP 13: $500 → 12%NGORONGORO COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $2k → 11%ERIC CARLE MUSEUM: $5k → 12%NGORONGORO COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $1k → 11%NGORONGORO COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $500 → 11%HARDIWCK TOWN HOUSE: $18k → 11%FRIENDS OF THE STONE CHURCH INC: $15k → 11%FRIENDS OF THE STONE CHURCH INC: $2k → 11%ANGEL'S ANSWER: $2k → 11%FRIENDS OF THE STONE CHURCH INC: $2k → 11%HARDIWCK TOWN HOUSE: $1k → 11%HARDWICK YOUTH CENTER: $1k → 11%AMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY: $108k → 11%NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$91k · 8 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +100% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$91k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
-8%

Still filing today

63%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
ReligionEducationHealthArts & CultureInternationalEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LT
    LISTENING THE BARRE INTEGRATED HEALTH CENTER INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $22k · revenue +15%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE STONE CHURCH
    3× · 2019–2022 · $19k · revenue +24%
  • W1
    WORKSHOP 13 INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $6k · revenue +201%

Funded once

  • QV
    QUABOAG VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -8%
  • NO
    NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • EC
    ERIC CARLE MUSEUM
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners

The maine organic farmers and gardeners association is transforming our food system by supporting farmers, empowering people to feed their communities and advocating for an organic future.

Food & Nutrition
2
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage
—
3
Walpole Historical Society
—
4
The Colonial Society of Massachusetts
—
5
Massachusetts Horticultural Society

Massachusetts horticultural society seeks to help people change their lives and communities for the better through growing plants together. for 196 years, massachusetts horticultural society has had a mission to promote the art and science…

Environment
6
New England College

An independent liberal arts college offering undergraduate, graduate and professional programs.

Education
7
New England Farm Workers Council Inc

Human welfare organization

—
8
Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art

Creation and operation of world class contemporary art museum and securing related funding.

Education
9
Boston-Saranac Historical Society
—
10
Northeast Organic Farming Assoc

To educate its membership and the people of the state of connecticut as to the benefits of natural, organic, ecological agriculture, including the implications relating to their health.

Food & Nutrition
11
New England Antiquities Research

Educate members and general public regarding native american stone features located throughout new england.

—
12
Ausable Artisan Village

To initiate and support art and creative activities that enrich lives and fuel cultural and economic development of the grayling community and northern michigan region

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Listening the Barre Integrated Health; the most unlike its peers is Northeast Organic Farming Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY: $107,650 · EducationAMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETYHARDIWCK TOWN HOUSE: $18,819 · OtherHARDIWCK TOWN HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $13,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION: $6,000 · OtherNORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING…ERIC CARLE MUSEUM: $5,000 · OtherERIC CARLE MUSEUMTRI-PARISH CHURCH: $3,500 · OtherTRI-PARISH CHURCHANGELS ANSWER INC: $2,000 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE STONE CHURCH: $19,000 · ReligionFRIENDS OF …AGAPE COMMUNITY INC: $4,000 · ReligionAGAPE COMMU…LISTENING THE BARRE INTEGRATED HEALTH CENTER INC: $22,000 · HealthLISTENING T…QUABOAG VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 · EmploymentWORKSHOP 13 INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureNGORONGORO COMMUNITY NETWORK INCORPORATED: $3,500 · International
Education$107,650Other$50,219Religion$23,000Health$22,000Employment$10,000Arts & Culture$6,000International$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY: $107,650 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLISTENING THE BARRE INTEGRATED HEALTH CENTER INC: $22,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE STONE CHURCH: $19,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWORKSHOP 13 INC: $6,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetAGAPE COMMUNITY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetNGORONGORO COMMUNITY NETWORK INCORPORATED: $3,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LISTENING THE BARRE INTEGRATED HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE STONE CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds QUABOAG VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WORKSHOP 13 INC ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds NGORONGORO COMMUNITY NETWORK INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Donovan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Donovan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • American Antiquarian Society: 7% of income from government
  • Friends of the Stone Church: 2% of income from government
  • Workshop 13 Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Donovan’s filings →

More from the funding graph