Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Donald F & Barbara L Newman Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.6M
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$877k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 61% of THE DONALD F & BARBARA L NEWMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$877,346
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHAEL AND MARCY NEWMAN FUND$877,346
NEWMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION$877,346
THOMAS AND CAROL NEWMAN CHARITABLE FUND$877,346
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BORDER ANGELS: $3k → 11%BORDER ANGELS: $3k → 11%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $6k → 13%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OH
CT
CA
VA
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$615k · 25 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 25 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
26

Total granted

$615k
$361k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+51%

Still filing today

68%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22
Arts & CultureHealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NICHOLS SCHOOL OF BUFFALO
    4× · 2017–2020 · $50k · revenue +48%
  • BUFFALO PREP INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $49k · revenue +49%
  • KALEIDA HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • LM
    LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $120k · revenue +8%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHTOWNS
    one grant, 2020 · $85k
  • TB
    The Boys and Girls Club of the Northtowns Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $47k · revenue +37% · 46% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Invest Buffalo Niagara Inc

To attract new employers to the buffalo niagara region through outreach to growing companies around the world. to support business attraction, expansion and entrepreneurship, invest buffalo niagara collaborates with local businesses,…

Community Improvement
9
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Buffalo Niagara Partnership Inc

By mobilizing members and strategic partners around common goals, the partnership grows private investment and jobs in buffalo niagara through advocacy, business development, and convening.

11
Erie Community Foundation

The erie community foundation works to improve the quality of life for all in our region by evaluating and addressing community issues, building permanent charitable endowments, and by promoting philanthropic and community leadership.

Philanthropy
12
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ecmc Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Newman Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyMarine and Environmental Co…Volunteer Fire & Emergency …Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Arts OrganizationsRegional Economic Developme…Healthcare System Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr11%33%35–55yr12%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%64%10–20yr17%9%20–35yr11%16%35–55yr12%11%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
14%
2,597/18,745

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
24/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MICHAEL AND MARCY NEWMAN FUND — $877,346 · OtherMICHAEL AND MARCY NEWMAN FUNDTHOMAS AND CAROL NEWMAN CHARITABLE FUND — $877,346 · OtherTHOMAS AND CAROL NEWMAN CHARITABLE FUNDTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $133,000 · OtherTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHTOWNS — $85,000 · Other+29 more — $262,500 · Other+29 moreNEWMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $877,346 · PhilanthropyNEWMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INCROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $58,500 · PhilanthropyROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDAT…+2 more — $15,000 · PhilanthropyLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC — $120,000 · Science & TechBUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY INC — $30,000 · Arts & CultureASSEMBLY HOUSE 150 INC — $20,500 · Arts & CultureBUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY — $19,000 · Arts & CultureINVESTIGATIVE POST INC — $19,000 · Arts & CultureJUST BUFFALO LITERARY CENTER INC — $4,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $2,000 · Arts & CultureKALEIDA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $30,000 · HealthECMC FOUNDATION INC — $27,000 · HealthMORTON PLANT MEASE HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · HealthJupiter Medical Center Inc — $10,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 · HealthNICHOLS SCHOOL OF BUFFALO — $50,000 · EducationCANISIUS UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · EducationTHE SUMMIT CENTER INC — $5,000 · Education+1 more — $2,000 · EducationThe Boys and Girls Club of the Northtowns Foundation Inc — $47,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,235,192Philanthropy$950,846Science & Tech$120,000Arts & Culture$95,000Health$92,000Education$72,000Youth Development$47,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC — $120,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNICHOLS SCHOOL OF BUFFALO — $50,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBUFFALO PREP INC — $49,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetThe Boys and Girls Club of the Northtowns Foundation Inc — $47,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetKALEIDA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetECMC FOUNDATION INC — $27,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetASSEMBLY HOUSE 150 INC — $20,500 over 4y, 50% of budgetMORTON PLANT MEASE HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY — $19,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINVESTIGATIVE POST INC — $19,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetAMHERST POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetCANISIUS UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetClearwater Marine Aquarium Inc — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SUNCOAST INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLOXAHATCHEE RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBORDER ANGELS — $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SUMMIT CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUFFALO ROTARY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER BUFFALO INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUST BUFFALO LITERARY CENTER INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION OF WNY — $4,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetERIE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVICTORY SPORTS GLOBAL OUTREACH INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSHAKESPEARE IN DELAWARE PARK INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Baird FoundationNY26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Baird Foundation · Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · The Osc Charitable Foundation · The Western New York Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · The Margaret L Wendt Foundation · First Niagara Foundation · Children's Foundation of Erie County Inc · The Richard W Rupp Foundation · The Cameron and Jane Baird Foundation · Rich Family Foundation · Cullen Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Donald F & Barbara L Newman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Loxahatchee River Historical Society Inc6% of income from government
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc2% of income from government
  • Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc1% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Donald F & Barbara L Newman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Donald F & Barbara L Newman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph