Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dillow Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2022
9
Grants FY2022
6
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Religion$178kHuman Services$93kRecreation & Sports$9kYouth Development$7kInternational$5kHealth$770Other$0
02FY2022 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k8 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $27k
$5,700
Median grant
6
States reached
$869k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Relevant Church$26,725
Focus on the Family$7,200
New Life Ministries$7,200
Family Life$7,200
Carenet Prenancy Center$5,700
Athletes in Action (Intervarsity)$1,800
Young Life$1,800
Compassion International$675
Food for the Hungry$556
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 35% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Food for the Hungry: $556 → 11%Living Stones Church: $2k → 15%Family Life: $7k → 17%C R U: $50 → 13%St Jude Childrens Research: $350 → 17%Focus on the Family: $7k → 9%Trinity Presbyterian: $50 → 19%Cystic Fibrosis Foundation: $50 → 8%Hollywood VFD: $100 → 8%Food for the Hungry: $550 → 11%Living Stone: $300 → 15%Family Life: $7k → 17%Focus on the Family: $7k → 9%Cystic Fibrosis Foundation: $50 → 8%Relevant Church: $27k → 8%Food for the Hungry: $500 → 11%Family Life: $7k → 17%Focus on the Family: $7k → 9%Real Life Church: $26k → 8%Food for the Hungry: $456 → 11%Family Life: $7k → 17%Focus on the Family: $7k → 9%Real Life Church: $26k → 8%Family Life: $7k → 17%Focus on the Family: $7k → 9%Real Life Church: $26k → 8%Real Life Church: $16k → 8%Hospice of St Marys County: $160 → 8%Hospice of St Marys County: $160 → 8%Carenet Prenancy Center: $6k → 8%Carenet Prenancy Center: $4k → 8%Carenet Prenancy Center: $4k → 8%CARENET PRENANCY CENTER: $3k → 8%Carenet Prenancy Center: $3k → 8%Paul Susan Kwak: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$262k · 11 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$262k
$5k

Still filing today

36%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22
InternationalReligionYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    5× · 2017–2022 · $7k · revenue +59%
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    5× · 2017–2022 · $3k · revenue +16%
  • FF
    FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $2k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • AI
    Athletes in Action
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • LS
    LIVING STONES CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Real Life Church: $93,581 · OtherReal Life ChurchFamily Life: $36,000 · OtherFamily LifeFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $36,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYRelevant Church: $26,725 · OtherRelevant ChurchCarenet Prenancy Center: $20,642 · OtherCarenet Prenancy Center+10 more: $12,920 · Other+10 moreNEW LIFE MINISTRIES: $55,700 · ReligionNEW LIFE MINISTRIESYOUNG LIFE: $7,200 · Youth DevelopmentCompassion International Incorporated: $2,798 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC: $2,062 · InternationalCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $100 · Health
Other$225,868Religion$55,700Youth Development$7,200International$4,860Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW LIFE MINISTRIES: $55,700 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $7,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $2,798 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC: $2,062 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $100 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dillow Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dillow Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Dillow Family Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Dillow Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dillow Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph