Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Dickens Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$242k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$195k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.4MAnimals$73kHealth$64kEnvironment$60kRecreation & Sports$55kPhilanthropy$16kReligion$6kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $195k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$194,644
DUCKS UNLIMITED$10,000
CHILDRENS HEALTH CARE OF ATLANTA$10,000
WILLIAM C HARTMAN JR FUND$5,500
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION$5,000
WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION$5,000
TROUT UNLIMITED$5,000
GEORGIA EQUINE RESCUE LEAGUE$3,000
NATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION$2,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $195k → 16%NATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION: $10k → 16%GAFFNEY HIGH SCHOOL: $74k → 17%DUCKS UNLIMITED: $10k → 17%PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $17k → 9%HAITI HUMANITARIAN RELIEF: $8k → 11%GEORGIA EQUINE RESCUE LEAGUE: $13k → 11%CAMP BRAVEHEART: $5k → 12%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $12k → 13%CHILDRENS HEALTH CARE OF ATLANTA: $10k → 14%CU FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%TROUT UNLIMITED: $5k → 7%UNITED WAY - KENTUCKY: $5k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $145k → 16%NATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION: $4k → 16%GAFFNEY HIGH SCHOOL: $41k → 17%DUCKS UNLIMITED: $10k → 17%GEORGIA EQUINE RESCUE LEAGUE: $8k → 11%GRADY HOSPITAL: $8k → 13%CHILDRENS HEALTH CARE OF ATLANTA: $8k → 14%CU FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%TROUT UNLIMITED: $4k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $144k → 16%GAFFNEY HIGH SCHOOL: $32k → 17%DUCKS UNLIMITED: $10k → 17%GEORGIA EQUINE RESQUE LEAGUE: $6k → 11%GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $8k → 13%CHILDRENS HEALTH CARE OF ATLANTA: $5k → 14%CU FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%TROUT UNLIMITED: $3k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF SC: $140k → 16%GAFFNEY HIGH SCHOOL: $20k → 17%DUCKS UNLIMITED: $10k → 17%GEORGIA EQUINE RESCUE LEAGUE: $5k → 11%GRADY HOSPITAL: $4k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF SC: $127k → 16%GAFFNEY HIGH SCHOOL: $18k → 17%DUCKS UNLIMITED: $5k → 17%GEORGIA EQUINE RESCUE LEAGUE: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF SC: $122k → 16%GAFFNEY HIGH SCHOOL: $13k → 17%DUCKS UNLIMITED: $3k → 17%GEORGIA EQUINE RESCUE LEAGUE: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $98k → 16%GEORGIA EQUINE RESCUE LEAGUE: $3k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF SC: $96k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SC: $88k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
CO
KY
VA
AR
TN
SC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 12 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +91% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$1.6M
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+13%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsPhilanthropyEnvironmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Georgia Athletic Assn Inc
    6× · 2017–2023 · $55k · revenue +91%
  • DU
    Ducks Unlimited Inc
    6× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +99%
  • TU
    TROUT UNLIMITED INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • PC
    PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue +13%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue -83%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ducks Unlimited Inc Group Return

Ducks unlimited, inc. conserves, restores, and manages wetlands and associated habitats for north america's waterfowl. these habitats also benefit additional wildlife and people.

Environment
2
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

3
Wetlands America Trust Inc

Wetlands america trust, inc. is a nonprofit organization formed in 1985 to expand ducks unlimited, inc's mission to provide leadership in the protection of the natural balance of wetlands ecosystems ensuring the future viability of…

Environment
4
American Angus Association

To provide programs, services, technology and leadership to enhance the genetics of the angus breed, broaden its influence within the beef industry and expand the market for superior tasting, high-quality angus beef worldwide.

5
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
6
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
7
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
8
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
9
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
10
Gamecock Club of the University of South Carolina

To support the university of south carolina's athletic department by providing the necessary financial resources for scholarships and other educational services.

11
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
12
Ucf Athletics Association Inc

To provide opportunity to young people and develop leaders for industry, philanthropy, education and the community through the intercollegiate athletic experience.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Grady Health Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Georgia Equine Rescue League Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA — $581,148 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINAUNIVERSITY OF SC — $572,654 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SCGAFFNEY HIGH SCHOOL — $197,750 · OtherGAFFNEY HIGH SCHOOL+13 more — $148,150 · Other+13 moreUniversity of Georgia Athletic Assn Inc — $55,100 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationPROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC — $16,710 · EducationDucks Unlimited Inc — $48,000 · EnvironmentTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $11,500 · AnimalsWILD SHEEP FOUNDATION — $5,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $12,000 · HealthTHE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · Philanthropy
Other$1,499,702Education$91,810Environment$48,000Animals$16,500Health$12,000Philanthropy$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Georgia Athletic Assn Inc — $55,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc — $48,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA EQUINE RESCUE LEAGUE LTD — $40,500 over 7y, 8.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILD SHEEP FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Georgia Athletic Assn Inc
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc
  • Who funds GEORGIA EQUINE RESCUE LEAGUE LTD
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC
  • Who funds THE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Dickens Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Dickens Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Dickens Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph