Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Dianne Smith Goggan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$108kEducation$68kArts & Culture$62kHealth$55kInternational$50kEnvironment$40kFood & Nutrition$29kAnimals$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$981k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CURE CHILDHOOD CANCER$10,000
PEOPLE OF ACTION CARING FOR KIDS$10,000
THE VINES FOUNDATION$10,000
SAFE SHELTER$10,000
SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,200
FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ELEVATE CHARITIES: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
OH
CT
CA
AR
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$330k · 20 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
18

Total granted

$330k
$124k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+27%

Still filing today

70%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SAVANNAH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $55k · revenue +49%
  • Cure Childhood Cancer Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $35k · revenue +66%
  • SS
    SAFE SHELTER CENTER FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • BUILDON INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +27%
  • Central Texas Food Bank Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -28%
  • S
    SAVANNAHSUPPORTSUKRAINE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Street Center

The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…

2
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

3
Capital of Texas Public Telecommunications Council

Klru is a leader in public media, distinguished by its energetic engagement with the community and for the quality and creativity of content. klru illuminates the wider world of knowledge; the importance of discourse; and the many…

Arts & Culture
4
Austin Theatre Alliance

We're here to inspire generations. we connect people and strengthen community by showcasing unforgettable performances across genres, providing life-changing arts education programs, and dreaming up magical experiences in iconic venues…

Arts & Culture
5
Any Baby Can of Austin Inc

Any baby can, an austin-based nonprofit, partners with parents so children reach their full potential. with programs that meet clients where they are at home, work or school any baby can provides in-home therapy, parent education, mental…

6
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
7
San Diego Opera Association

Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…

Arts & Culture
8
Austin College

The mission of austin college is to educate students in the liberal arts and sciences in order to prepare them for rewarding careers and for full, engaged and meaningful lives.

Education
9
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
10
Aquila Theatre Company

Aquila theatre's mission is to create bold reinterpretations of the classics for contemporary audiences. by expanding the canon and diversifying the classics, aquila dares to expand our collective perspectives. aquila theatre is one of the…

Arts & Culture
11
Spca of Texas

The spca of texas is dedicated to providing every animal exceptional care and a loving home.

Animals
12
Transformations By Austin Angels

The austin angels mission is to walk alongside children, youth, and families in the foster care community by offering consistent support through intentional giving, relationship building, and mentorship.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Safe Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Ronald McDONALD House Charities of Greater North Texas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Land Conservation Organizat…Veteran Support ServicesCommunity Arts OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…Professional Ballet Compani…Food Pantries & AssistanceAnimal Rescue and AdoptionLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Classical Music Ensembles
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%4%<5yr17%8%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr14%15%20–35yr9%39%35–55yr13%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%3%<5yr17%4%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr14%15%20–35yr9%45%35–55yr13%28%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
19%
10,947/58,269

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
24/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PEOPLE OF ACTION CARING FOR KIDS — $35,000 · OtherPEOPLE OF ACTION CARING FOR KIDSTHE SAFE ALLIANCE — $20,000 · OtherTHE SAFE ALLIANCEAMERICAN SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL — $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN SECOND HARVEST OF COASTALAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL — $15,000 · OtherAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTALSAVANNAHSUPPORTSUKRAINE — $10,000 · OtherTHE VINES FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherAUSTIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $9,000 · OtherAmerican Gateways — $15,500 · OtherAmerican GatewaysTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC — $7,500 · Other+15 more — $79,300 · Other+15 moreSAVANNAH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $55,000 · EducationSAVANNAH COUN…FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $2,500 · EducationAUSTIN LYRIC OPERA — $19,000 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN LYRIC…SAVANNAH PHILHARMONIC CORPORATION — $10,500 · Arts & CultureSAVANNAH PHI…AUSTIN CHAMBER MUSIC CENTER — $6,839 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN CHAMB…BALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED — $5,500 · Arts & CultureBALLET AUSTI…The Adderley School Foundation — $5,000 · Arts & CultureThe Adderley…TELFAIR MUSEUM OF ART INC — $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE V O I C EXPERIENCE FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Arts & CultureSAFE SHELTER CENTER FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesSAFE SHELT…FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION — $16,000 · Human ServicesFOSTER ANG…ELEVATE CHARITIES — $5,000 · Human ServicesELEVATE CH…Cure Childhood Cancer Inc — $35,000 · HealthCure Child…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,132 · HealthST JUDE CH…BUILDON INC — $30,000 · InternationalALIGHT — $5,000 · InternationalCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $15,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$221,300Education$57,500Arts & Culture$51,839Human Services$46,000Health$45,132International$35,000Food & Nutrition$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAVANNAH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCure Childhood Cancer Inc — $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBUILDON INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE SHELTER CENTER FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN LYRIC OPERA — $19,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION — $16,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Gateways — $15,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVANNAH PHILHARMONIC CORPORATION — $10,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,132 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN CHAMBER MUSIC CENTER — $6,839 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAUSTIN CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY — $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED — $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPhi Delta Theta Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELEVATE CHARITIES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTSIDE CHILD AND FAMILIY ADVOCACY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $4,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBACKPACK BUDDIES OF GEORGIA INC — $4,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTELFAIR MUSEUM OF ART INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V O I C EXPERIENCE FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Savannah Community Foundation IncGA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Savannah Community Foundation Inc · Colonial Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · The Kodosky Foundation · The Hodge Foundation Inc · Eva & Marvin Womack Foundation · United Way of the Coastal Empire · Charities Aid Foundation America · Better Business Bureau · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Dianne Smith Goggan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph