Skip to content

· Public charity

The Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation

THE DESMOID TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION (dtrf) empowers and unites everyone committed to finding answers for the desmoid tumor community.

$171k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$30k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

51% of The Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
1
’18
1
’19
2
’20
1
’21
0
’22
1
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$1.0MEducation$357kScience & Tech$158k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $59,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $171,273 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $112,273 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$30,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$29,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 71% of grant dollars ($1.1M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 29% that went abroad ($439k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 29% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Broad Institute: $104k → 8%STANDFORD UNIVERSITY: $95k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $29k → 14%Sylvester CancerU Miami: $25k → 15%Ohio State University: $85k → 15%The Broad Institute: $104k → 8%Stanford University: $58k → 8%Childrens Hosp Los Angeles: $58k → 14%Ohio State University: $43k → 15%THE BROAD INSTITUTE: $99k → 8%Stanford University: $35k → 8%STANDFORD UNIVERSITY: $33k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $30k → 8%Stanford University: $27k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 29% of all-years giving ($439k)

6 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Belgium$210k · 4 grants
Italy$130k · 2 grants
United Kingdom$30k · 1 grant
Germany$30k · 1 grant
Canada$29k · 1 grant
Japan$10k · 1 grant

Grants abroad, by region: $41k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

India$41k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THREE-YEAR RESEARCH GRANT TO SEE THE EARLY EFFECT OF SORAFENIB ON COGNITION, CARDIOVASCULAR AND REPRODUCTIVE FUNCTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH FIBROMATOSIS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 34% of The Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Desmoid Tumor Research Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 29% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 6 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$160k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    The Broad Institute Inc
    3× · 2019–2021 · $308k · revenue +58%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $237k · revenue +51%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    2× · 2020–2023 · $87k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • MC
    Mayo Clinic
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • UH
    Universtat Heidelberg
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • IF
    Institute for Cancer Research
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Ghent University: $209,675 · OtherGhent UniversityBaschirotto Inst for Rare Dis: $130,000 · OtherBaschirotto Inst for Rare DisOhio State University: $127,782 · OtherOhio State UniversityMayo Clinic: $30,000 · OtherUniverstat Heidelberg: $30,000 · OtherInstitute for Cancer Research: $30,000 · OtherHospital for Sick Children: $29,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · Other+2 more: $16,000 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $278,727 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND ST…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $237,220 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYThe Broad Institute Inc: $308,112 · HealthThe Broad Institute IncChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $87,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angel…
Other$627,457Education$515,947Health$395,112

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $308,112 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $278,727 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $237,220 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $87,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Broad Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $51k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Desmoid Tumor Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph