Skip to content
The Deoudes Children's Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Deoudes Children's Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$193k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$186kEducation$180kArts & Culture$60kCommunity Improvement$24kHuman Services$9k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC$130,000
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC$50,000
JAYDEN DELUCA FOUNDATION INC$10,100
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATI$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GIRAFFE LAUGH INC: $5k → 8%GIRAFFE LAUGH INC: $4k → 8%CORWYNS CAUSE INC DBA RAYS FOR RARE: $15k → 8%RAYS FOR RARE: $10k → 8%CORWYNS CAUSE INC DBA RAYS FOR RARE: $10k → 8%CORWYNS CAUSE INC DBA RAYS FOR RARE: $5k → 8%CORWYNS CAUSE INC DBA RAYS FOR RARE: $4k → 8%CORWYNS CAUSE INC DBA RAYS FOR RARE: $1k → 8%TREASURE VALLEY CHILDRENS THEATER: $20k → 8%TREASURE VALLEY CHILDRENS THEATER: $10k → 8%TREASURE VALLEY CHILDRENS THEATER: $10k → 8%TREASURE VALLEY CHILDRENS THEATER: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$261k · 6 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$261k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $183k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JD
    Jayden DeLuca Foundation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +49%
  • TV
    TREASURE VALLEY CHILDREN'S THEATER
    6× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +14%
  • CC
    Corwyns Cause Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Unravel

To raise awareness about the lack of funding for pediatric cancer research. we empower individuals to take action in their own communities so they can fight for change by raising funds and volunteering.

Health
2
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
3
Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc

Vision A world without childhood brain tumors. Mission Care. Cure. Thrive.

Health
4
D-Feet Cancer the Dalton Fox Foundation

D-Feet Cancer The Dalton Fox Foundation raises awareness of Ewing Sarcoma and other under-studied pediatric cancers. By directly funding research into these cancers, we are determined to help discover more effective and less toxic…

Health
5
Alexs Lemonade Stand Foundation

The foundation's purpose is to change the lives of children with cancer through funding impactful research, raising awareness, supporting families, and empowering everyone to help cure childhood cancer.

—
6
Elevate Childhood Cancer Research and Advocacy

Elevate Childhood Cancer Research and Advocacy advances its charitable mission through three core pillars: advocacy, empowerment, and strategic investment in research. Advocacy focuses on elevating the voices of patients and caregivers…

Philanthropy
7
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
8
The National Fragile X Foundation

The national fragile x foundation serves the entire fragile x community to live their best lives by providing the knowledge, resources, and tools until, and even after, more effective treatments and a cure are achieved.

Health
9
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
12
Progeria Research Foundation Inc

Discover treatments & cure for progeria & its aging related disorders, including heart disease.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Florida Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Treasure Valley Children's Theater. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $180,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCJayden DeLuca Foundation Inc: $114,635 · HealthJayden DeLuca Foundation IncSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $15,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENDRUG POLICY ALLIANCE: $9,231 · HealthDRUG POLICY ALLIANCETREASURE VALLEY CHILDREN'S THEATER: $60,000 · Human ServicesTREASURE VALLEY CHILDREN'S T…Corwyns Cause Inc: $45,000 · Human ServicesCorwyns Cause IncGIRAFFE LAUGH INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesGIRAFFE LAUGH INCIDAHO FREEDOM FOUNDATION INC: $24,000 · Community ImprovementALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATI: $2,500 · Other
Education$180,000Health$138,866Human Services$113,500Community Improvement$24,000Other$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $180,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJayden DeLuca Foundation Inc: $114,635 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetTREASURE VALLEY CHILDREN'S THEATER: $60,000 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetCorwyns Cause Inc: $45,000 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetIDAHO FREEDOM FOUNDATION INC: $24,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRUG POLICY ALLIANCE: $9,231 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRAFFE LAUGH INC: $8,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Deoudes Children's Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Deoudes Children's Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Deoudes Children's’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home