Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dean & Cam Williams Foundation Inc

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$101k
Granted FY2019
12
Grants FY2019
8
States reached
$38k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Dean & Cam Williams Foundation Inc’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year The Dean & Cam Williams Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $101k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
’17
10
’18
10
’19
1
’20
0
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Philanthropy$2.1MAnimals$390kSocial Science$48kEducation$16kReligion$9kHuman Services$6kCivil Rights$3kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2019 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k10 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $68k
$4,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLOUCESTER-MATHEWS HUMANE SOCIETY$38,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIVING ACCOUNT$30,167
MISES INSTITUTE$9,000
THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE$5,000
FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION$5,000
NAVY-MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETY$4,000
GRACE COVENANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,000
INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE$2,000
DOGS DESERVE BETTER$2,000
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION$1,000
SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION$1,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 11% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE: $2k → 10%FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION: $1k → 22%THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $5k → 10%THE ASSOCIATION FOR TEACHING KIDS ECONOMICS: $1k → 16%SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $4k → 14%MISES INSTITUTE: $9k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $5k → 13%TURNING POINT USA: $1k → 14%NAVY-MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETY: $4k → 7%GRACE COVENANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $3k → 7%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $1k → 8%DOGS DESERVE BETTER: $2k → 9%GLOUCESTER-MATHEWS HUMANE SOCIETY: $277k → 9%CORNERSTONE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $1k → 9%NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE: $2k → 10%FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION: $1k → 22%THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $4k → 10%SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $3k → 14%MISES INSTITUTE: $8k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $4k → 13%NAVY-MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETY: $1k → 7%GRACE COVENANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $2k → 7%DOGS DESERVE BETTER: $1k → 9%GLOUCESTER-MATHEWS HUMANE SOCIETY: $38k → 9%INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE: $1k → 10%FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION: $1k → 22%THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $3k → 10%SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%MISES INSTITUTE: $7k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $3k → 13%NAVY-MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETY: $1k → 7%GRACE COVENANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $1k → 7%GLOUCESTER-MATHEWS HUMANE SOCIETY: $37k → 9%GLOUCESTER-MATHEWS HUMANE SOCIETY: $35k → 9%WARE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
OH
PA
CA
VA
DE
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$461k · 10 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$461k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+185%
+1293%

Still filing today

90%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationAnimalsSocial SciencePublic BenefitCivil RightsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GLOUCESTER-MATHEWS HUMANE SOCIETY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $387k · revenue +397%
  • LV
    LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $24k · revenue +294%
  • TI
    THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $12k · revenue +185%

Funded once

  • WE
    WARE EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue ×14
  • CF
    CORNERSTONE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
6
Institute for Shipboard Education

Journeys of discovery that spark bold solutions to global challenges.

Education
7
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
8
The Institute of World Politics

The institute of world politics is a graduate school of national security and international affairs, dedicated to developing leaders with a sound understanding of international realities and the ethical conduct of statecraft, based on…

International
9
Defense of Freedom Institute for Policy Studies Inc

To provide thoughtful, conservative solutions to the challenges presented by education, workforce, labor and employment issues.

Education
10
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
11
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
12
Institute for Experiential Learning Inc

The mission of the washington internship institute is to foster students' intellectual, personal, and professional development through individually tailored, quality internships and challenging academic coursework that take full advantage…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Intercollegiate Studies Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dogs Deserve Better Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $2,105,804 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCGLOUCESTER-MATHEWS HUMANE SOCIETY: $386,723 · AnimalsGLOUCESTER-MATHE…FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIVING ACCOUNT: $30,167 · OtherLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $24,000 · OtherTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $12,000 · OtherGRACE COVENANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $6,000 · Other+6 more: $6,000 · OtherHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $7,000 · EducationINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 · EducationDOGS DESERVE BETTER INC: $3,000 · EducationSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationFoundation for Economic Education Inc: $12,000 · Social ScienceNAVY-MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETY: $6,000 · Public BenefitFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $3,000 · Civil RightsNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$2,105,804Animals$386,723Other$78,167Education$18,000Social Science$12,000Public Benefit$6,000Civil Rights$3,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOUCESTER-MATHEWS HUMANE SOCIETY: $386,723 over 4y, 18% of budgetLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $24,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for Economic Education Inc: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY-MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dean & Cam Williams Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dean & Cam Williams Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Dean & Cam Williams Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Dean & Cam Williams Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dean & Cam Williams’ filings →

    More from the funding graph