Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The David L Simon Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$137k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$114k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$793kEducation$81kHuman Services$29kHealth$18kPhilanthropy$15kYouth Development$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $114k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIDBAR KODESH TEMPLE$114,100
Individual grant recipient$6,850
COLLABORATION CENTER$5,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$4,300
VIMA CHILDREN'S HOME$4,000
IMPROVE CARE NOW$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDREN WITH HAIR LOSS: $200 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$976k · 10 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$976k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
-14%

Still filing today

40%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MK
    MIDBAR KODESH TEMPLE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $793k
  • TU
    TOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA
    4× · 2017–2020 · $54k · revenue +43%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2020–2025 · $31k

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF LV
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CC
    CLARK COUNTRY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • DM
    DR MIRIAM AND SHELDON G ADELSON EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +42%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Solomon Schechter Day School of Lv

To provide a jewish day school for the children of las vegas

2
Las Vegas Jewish Experience

To provide religious and educational programs for college students and young professionals in las vegas and reno nevada. activities include classes, individualized bible study sessions,sabbath services and programs and religious retreats.

Religion
3
Las Vegas Jewish Community Inc

To promote the religious, spiritual, cultural and social traditions of Judaism through a variety of educational and communal activity and holy day observances

Religion
4
University of Nevada School of Medicine Multispecialty Group Practice South Inc

Medical education, scientific research, and patient care.

Health
5
Hillel At the University of New Mexico

Hillel at unm is the center for jewish student and young professional life in albuquerque, new mexico.

6
Unlv Medicine

Create a world class center of excellence and innovation for medical education, patient care, and research that prepares nevada's physicians with the most advanced knowledge, treatments, and technologies while serviing heath care needs of…

Health
7
Ateres Bnos Ita

To operate jewish high school for girls in las vegas, nv.

Education
8
University of Judaism Foundation
9
Denver Jewish Day School

To ensure a jewish future by challenging minds and nurturing souls with a focus on academic excellence and jewish learning.

Education
10
Community Kollel of Greater Las Vegas

To enrich the jewish community of greater las vegas with the joy, vitality and warmth of torah study.

Religion
11
Yeshiva Day School of Las Vegas

To provide a high quality religious and secular education for grades pre-k through 8.

Education
12
Ashreinu Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose involves jewish education primarily to unaffiliated and minority or marginally affiliated jewish students on university campuses throughout southern california.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Jewish University and the most unlike its peers is Nevada Youth Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MIDBAR KODESH TEMPLE — $792,998 · OtherMIDBAR KODESH TEMPLEIndividual grant recipient — $30,750 · Other+8 more — $74,500 · Other+8 moreTOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA — $54,000 · EducationLas Vegas Clark County Library District Foundation — $21,000 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $3,000 · EducationIMPROVECARENOW INC — $18,000 · HealthCHILDREN WITH HAIR LOSS INC — $200 · Human ServicesNEVADA YOUTH NETWORK — $100 · Youth Development
Other$898,248Education$78,000Health$18,000Human Services$200Youth Development$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA — $54,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLas Vegas Clark County Library District Foundation — $21,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetIMPROVECARENOW INC — $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER — $10,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDR MIRIAM AND SHELDON G ADELSON EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN WITH HAIR LOSS INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA
  • Who funds Las Vegas Clark County Library District Foundation
  • Who funds IMPROVECARENOW INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DR MIRIAM AND SHELDON G ADELSON EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE
  • Who funds CHILDREN WITH HAIR LOSS INC
  • Who funds NEVADA YOUTH NETWORK

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The David L Simon Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The David L Simon Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The David L Simon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph