Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Dave & Kathleen Dicesaris Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$115kHuman Services$79kHealth$58kArts & Culture$40kEducation$15kEnvironment$11kPhilanthropy$4kCommunity Improvement$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$36k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUTH SPORTS ALLIANCE$15,000
ALTA HEIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$500
NAPA VALLEY VINTNERS$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE PEACE HOUSE: $25k → 5%THE PEACE HOUSE: $12k → 5%THE PEACE HOUSE: $10k → 5%THE PEACE HOUSE: $5k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$206k · 5 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +380% since the first grant, against +63% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
14

Total granted

$206k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+380%
+63%

Still filing today

40%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YS
    YOUTH SPORTS ALLIANCE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $113k
  • PH
    Peace House Inc
    4× · 2018–2021 · $52k · revenue -31%
  • PH
    People's Health Clicnic
    2× · 2018–2019 · $20k · revenue +380%

Funded once

  • TV
    THE V FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue +54%
  • PC
    PARK CITY HIGH SCHOOL BAND
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • PC
    PARK CITY HIGH SCHOOL BANDS
    one grant, 2022 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
2
Palo Alto University Inc

Advancing human understanding through education, research, and practice in behavioral science

Education
3
Vail International Pro Am
Recreation & Sports
4
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
5
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
6
The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College

Located in south hadley, massachusetts, mount holyoke college is a highly selective, nondenominational, residential, research liberal arts college for women that is gender-diverse and welcomes applications from female, transgender, and…

Education
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
Prescott College Inc

Together, we create interdisciplinary, experiential, and diverse learning environments that inspire future leaders to develop a healthy, just and sustainable world. we value our inclusive community, experiential and field-based learning, a…

9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

11
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
12
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Park City Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Howell Mountain Wine Auction. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YOUTH SPORTS ALLIANCE — $112,500 · OtherYOUTH SPORTS ALLIANCEPARK CITY HIGH SCHOOL BAND — $20,000 · OtherPARK CITY HIGH SCHOOL BANDPARK CITY HIGH SCHOOL BANDS — $20,000 · OtherPARK CITY HIGH SCHOOL BANDSIndividual grant recipient — $19,104 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+9 more — $17,720 · Other+9 moreTHE V FOUNDATION — $34,954 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATIONPeople's Health Clicnic — $20,000 · HealthPeople's Health Cli…Peace House Inc — $51,744 · Human ServicesPeace House IncWEILENMANN SCHOOL OF DISCOVERY — $10,100 · EducationPOMONA COLLEGE — $5,000 · EducationNAPA COUNTY LAND TRUST — $5,000 · EnvironmentHOWELL MOUNTAIN WINE AUCTION — $2,500 · PhilanthropyPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER — $2,250 · Recreation & Sports
Other$189,324Health$54,954Human Services$51,744Education$15,100Environment$5,000Philanthropy$3,500Recreation & Sports$2,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPeace House Inc — $51,744 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $34,954 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPeople's Health Clicnic — $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWEILENMANN SCHOOL OF DISCOVERY — $10,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNAPA COUNTY LAND TRUST — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOWELL MOUNTAIN WINE AUCTION — $2,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER — $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNapa Valley Vintners — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Peace House Inc
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION
  • Who funds People's Health Clicnic
  • Who funds WEILENMANN SCHOOL OF DISCOVERY
  • Who funds NAPA COUNTY LAND TRUST
  • Who funds POMONA COLLEGE
  • Who funds HOWELL MOUNTAIN WINE AUCTION
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER
  • Who funds PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Napa Valley Vintners

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Dave & Kathleen Dicesaris Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph