· Private foundation
Dalal Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $218k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
- $250k+1 grant · $790k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA | $789,962 |
| THE WARDLAW HARTRIDGE SCHOOL | $100,000 |
| VARIOUS OTHER SMALL DONATIONS | $27,340 |
| IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS | $25,000 |
| GOTR OF CENTRAL NJ INC | $20,000 |
| PRATHAM USA | $20,000 |
| MIDDLESEX COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| AYATI CHARITY | $16,000 |
| FIT FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| SKN FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| BONNIE BRAE | $10,000 |
| HEART & HAND FOR HANDICAPPED | $10,000 |
| PNR USA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| VRAJ | $10,000 |
| SPTS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 80% of grant dollars ($2.2M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 20% that went abroad ($542k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Beyond the US — 20% of all-years giving ($542k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $877k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWTHE WARDLAW-HARTRIDGE SCHOOL5× · 2017–2024 · $136k · revenue +44%
MIDDLESEX COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2024 · $85k · revenue +547%- MSMUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC3× · 2018–2022 · $60k · revenue +93%
Funded once
- SBSHREE BORIVALI GUJARATI SEVA MANDALone grant, 2021 · $400k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $250k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
PPES USAs Mission is to further the education of young women. It does so by supporting Pardada Pardadi Educational Society India PPES India a school for girls in uttar pradesh India.
Education
Contribute towards education in rural india
Transforming lives of underprivileged children through education, technology, healthcare programs, and connection with a global network of qualified volunteers and mentors.
Provide no cost education or facilitate by lending funds to other non profits and deserving students,teachers and schools in underserved communities to underserved and remote villages and locations where Governments cannot offer tuition or…
Public education
The purpose of Arya Pragati USA is to provide financial support to capable financially underprivileged students in India to complete their studies. These studies can be for Undergraduate, Post-Graduate, preparation for competitive exams or…
Eradicate cureable blindness, girls education, and women empowerment in the rural india
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seeing Eye Inc and the most unlike its peers is Muni Seva Charitable Foundation Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE WARDLAW-HARTRIDGE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MIDDLESEX COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HEART AND HAND FOR THE HANDICAPPED LTD ↗
- Who funds MUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC ↗
- Who funds PNR USA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AYATI ↗
- Who funds SOUTH PLAINFIELD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS ↗
- Who funds PILLAR CARE CONTINUUM ↗
- Who funds Pets for Vets Inc ↗
- Who funds BONNIE BRAE ↗
- Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
- Who funds PATRIOTS' PATH COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds ISHA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YUVA PRAGATI INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Columbia Bank Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · American Express Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dalal Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bonnie Brae — 3% of income from government
- Pillar Care Continuum — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dalal Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Dalal Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.