· Private foundation
The D & T Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BAIS TOVA | $2,000 |
| KOLLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM | $1,800 |
| BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA | $1,500 |
| TIFERES MOSHE | $1,000 |
| NALEH | $500 |
| THE DONORS FUND | $250 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
56 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- BRBAIS REUVEN KAMENETZ OF LAKEWOOD2× · 2022–2024 · $91k · revenue +149%
- MKMESIVTA KEREN ORAH4× · 2017–2020 · $18k · revenue +37%
- BMBAIS MEDRASH ZICHRON MEIR INC3× · 2020–2024 · $18k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- GGMTone grant, 2022 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
Provide a building for a religious school.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students
Religious Teaching
Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.
The purpose of this organization is to support indigent torah scholars and their families by providing stipends and additional funds at jewish holiday times.
Yeshiva toras aron is a religious elementary school providing quality education for grades k-8 for the children of lakewood nj.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
To provide religious Jewish education.
How this is measured
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 156 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BAIS REUVEN KAMENETZ OF LAKEWOOD ↗
- Who funds KOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM ↗
- Who funds MESIVTA KEREN ORAH ↗
- Who funds BAIS MEDRASH ZICHRON MEIR INC ↗
- Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM INC ↗
- Who funds BAIS TOVA INC ↗
- Who funds TIKVAH LECHAIM INC ↗
- Who funds MACHZIKEI YISROEL INC ↗
- Who funds TORAS IMECHA INC ↗
- Who funds BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · David Rosenbaum Family Foundation · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Toras Chesed Inc · Sff Foundation · Dirshu International Inc · Harry H Beren Foundation Ig · J & E Wolf Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The D & T Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The D & T Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Toras Imecha Inc: 22% of income from government
- Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc: 21% of income from government
- Mesivta Keren Orah: 10% of income from government
- Bais Tova Inc: 7% of income from government
- Masores Bnos Yisroel Inc: 7% of income from government
- Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud: 6% of income from government
- Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The D & T Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The D & T Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on D & T’s filings →