· Private foundation
The Creative Gift Foundation Inc
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k3 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Lambs Players Theatre | $10,000 |
| FusionFest INC | $5,000 |
| Taproot Theatre | $5,000 |
| Applied theatre center | $1,895 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.
7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- LPLAMBS PLAYERS THEATRE2× · 2020–2022 · $25k · revenue +73%
- FIFUSIONFEST INC3× · 2018–2022 · $22k · revenue +55%
FRACTURED ATLAS INC3× · 2018–2020 · $11k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- PTPACIFIC THEATREone grant, 2020 · $8k
- PSPORTLAND STAGE COMPANYone grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +7%
- SASPARK AND ECHO ARTS INCone grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue -78%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promoting new artists in the performing arena
We are a theatre company. We provide opportunities for local theatre artists and high quality productions for the public.
Artists repertory theatre's mission is to produce intimate, provacative theatre and provide a home for a diverse community of artists and audiences to take creative risks.
Develop recognition of international theater
Open Fist Theatre Company is a self-governing community of theatre artists who believe in the transformative imperative of inclusive and collaborative theatre. Dedicated to expanding social awareness through art, we seek, through diverse…
Our mission is to enliven our community by transforming found spaces with bold, theatrical endeavors. We place an emphasis on partnering with local businesses all over PDX to serve as venues for our productions
The Directors Company is an award-winning not-for-profit theatre company with an extraordinary record in its mission to develop and produce groundbreaking new plays and musicals initiated and generated by outstanding directorial talent,…
Professional arts organization that creates and presents original, accessbile, and optimistic works for theatre, film, visual arts, and literature.
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LAMBS PLAYERS THEATRE ↗
- Who funds FUSIONFEST INC ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds SEA DOG THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds THE TAPROOT THEATRE ↗
- Who funds APPLIED THEATRE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND STAGE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds SPARK AND ECHO ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN ARTS DISTRICT INC ↗
- Who funds CITA INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Creative Gift Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Creative Gift Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Creative Gift’s filings →