Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Cranberry Rose Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$26kFood & Nutrition$14kHealth$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kYouth Development$8kCivil Rights$7kPhilanthropy$4kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$128k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FAMILY PANTRY DAMIEN'S PLACE$3,000
YMCA SOUTHCOAST$2,500
COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS$1,500
THE WOMEN'S CENTER$1,500
WOMEN'S FUND SOUTHCOAST$1,500
WARRIOR BONFIRE PROGRAM$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Community Connections Inc: $2k → 8%Community Connections Inc: $2k → 8%Community Connections Inc: $2k → 8%Community Connections Inc: $2k → 8%Community Connections Inc: $2k → 8%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $2k → 8%Community Connections Inc: $1k → 8%The Family Pantry- Damien's Place: $4k → 8%The Family Pantry- Damien's Place: $3k → 8%THE FAMILY PANTRY DAMIEN'S PLACE: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$79k · 11 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$79k
$11k

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $12k · revenue +69%
  • TF
    THE FAMILY PANTRY- DAMIEN'S PLACE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +13%
  • NB
    NEW BEDFORD WOMEN'S CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $10k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • WC
    Wareham CORE Lopes Playground Rebui
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • GN
    GREATER N B WOMEN'S CTR
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • WB
    WAREHAM BOYS & GIRLS CLUB New Bedford
    one grant, 2019 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
2
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
3
Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board Inc

Meet the workforce needs of employers and support economic development in greater new bedford.

Community Improvement
4
The Community Action Agency of Western Connecticut Inc

The community action agency of western connecticut is a private non-profit corporation serving western connecticut. its primary purpose is to operate a multi-purpose organization to combat poverty and promote self sufficiency among low…

Community Improvement
5
Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts

The community foundation of western massachusetts seeks to enrich the quality of life of the people of our region by encouraging philanthropy, developing a permanent, flexible endowment, assessing and responding to emerging and changing…

Philanthropy
6
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
7
Women's Foodservice Forum

Accelerate the advancement of women leaders in the food industry. we believe in limitless opportunity for all women.

Food & Nutrition
8
Northshore Food Bank

Serving the northshore by providing access to basic needs.

9
Impact Community Action Partnership Inc

Reducing the barriers and burdens that families in poverty experience by increasing access to essential needs.

10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
Greater Boston Food Bank Inc

Our costs consist of acquiring, sorting and distributing food to 617 member agencies, transportation and logistics, and community outreach to 69 direct distribution sites such as gbfb mobile markets, and federal distributions for low…

12
Feeding Westchester Inc

Driven by the belief that access to healthy food is a basic right for all people, feeding westchester leads hunger action programs and mobilizes the resources needed to eradicate hunger in westchester county.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Valley Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Family Pantry- Damien's Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Warrior Bonfire Program — $11,000 · OtherWarrior Bonfire ProgramNEW BEDFORD WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $9,500 · OtherNEW BEDFORD WOMEN'S CENTER INCIndividual grant recipient — $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION SOUTHCOAST INC — $7,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION SOUTHCOAST INCWOMENS FUND SOUTHCOAST INC — $6,500 · OtherWOMENS FUND SOUTHCOAST INCFriends of Marion Council on Aging — $5,500 · OtherFriends of Marion Council on AgingSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $4,000 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHWAREHAM BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $4,000 · OtherWAREHAM BOYS & GIRLS CLUBWareham CORE Lopes Playground Rebui — $2,500 · Other+5 more — $10,000 · Other+5 moreCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC — $11,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INCTHE FAMILY PANTRY- DAMIEN'S PLACE — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY PANTRY- DAMIEN'…NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$67,500Human Services$21,500Philanthropy$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC — $11,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY PANTRY- DAMIEN'S PLACE — $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEW BEDFORD WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $9,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION SOUTHCOAST INC — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS FUND SOUTHCOAST INC — $6,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC
  • Who funds THE FAMILY PANTRY- DAMIEN'S PLACE
  • Who funds NEW BEDFORD WOMEN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION SOUTHCOAST INC
  • Who funds WOMENS FUND SOUTHCOAST INC
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Southcoast Community Foundation IncMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Southcoast Community Foundation Inc · Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · The Carney Family Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Cranberry Rose Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 76%
  • New Bedford Women's Center Inc84% of income from government
  • Community Connections Inc76% of income from government
  • The Family Pantry- Damien's Place36% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Cranberry Rose Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Cranberry Rose Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph