Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Coughlin Family Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$328kPhilanthropy$65kHousing & Shelter$45kEducation$44kInternational$44kHealth$35kCrime & Legal$17kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $14k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$787k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE$50,000
IMPACT U FOUNDATION$4,000
LIFEBRIDGE NORTHSHORE$1,000
PAN-MASS CHALLENGE$1,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$1,000
PINE STREET INN$1,000
HERREN PROJECT$1,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,000
MAYWOOD FINE ARTS$860
MARBLEHEAD MUSEUM$500
LAKE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION$500
SPUR$500
MARBLEHEAD FOOD PANTRY$500
THE GOLDTHWAIT RESERVATION$500
GREATER LOVELL LAND TRUST$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $334k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $1k → 8%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $4k → 14%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $200 → 7%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $200 → 7%MASSACHUSETTS BAIL FUND: $1k → 8%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $200 → 7%THE PINE STREET INN: $2k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $2k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%MA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $3k → 10%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $80k → 10%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $68k → 10%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $60k → 10%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $50k → 10%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $20k → 10%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $16k → 10%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $10k → 10%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $5k → 10%LIFEBRIDGE NORTHSHORE: $2k → 10%LIFEBRIDGE NORTHSHORE: $1k → 10%LIFEBRIDGE NORTHSHORE: $1k → 10%LIFEBRIDGE NORTHSHORE: $1k → 10%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $1k → 10%LIFEBRIDGE NORTHSHORE: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
RI
CO
VA
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$518k · 30 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
32

Total granted

$518k
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+34%

Still filing today

80%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationInternationalEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $310k · revenue +111%
  • II
    INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +462%
  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -21%
  • CR
    CRISTO REY
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • CR
    CRISTO REY NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
4
Massachusetts Business Roundtable Inc

The mission of the roundtable is to make massachusetts the most desirable place to live, work and do business by engaging private sector executives and public leaders to ensure access to a robust, diverse and talented workforce that…

—
5
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Institute for Nonprofit Practice Inc

The institute for nonprofit practice's mission is to transform communities by equipping the most promising nonprofit leaders with the skills, confidence, and resources they need to make their organizations effective, innovative, and…

Human Services
9
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
10
Massachusetts Housing Investment Corporation

Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…

Housing & Shelter
11
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cradles to Crayons Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chicago Football Classic Scholarship Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/47
Grantees still filing
35/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC: $309,900 · Human ServicesPLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC+9 more: $25,100 · Human Services+9 moreCRISTO REY: $25,000 · OtherCRISTO REYGIRLS INC: $11,705 · OtherGIRLS INCMARBLEHEAD COUNSELING CENTER: $9,500 · OtherMARBLEHEAD COUNSELING C…MAYWOOD FINE ARTS: $8,860 · OtherMAYWOOD FINE ARTSDOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $6,000 · OtherNORTHEAST ARC INC: $5,880 · OtherMARBLEHEAD ALL SPORTS BOOSTERS: $5,000 · OtherMARBLEHEAD FOOD PANTRY INC: $5,500 · OtherSWEDEN FOOD PANTRY: $5,500 · OtherLAKES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · OtherTHE HERREN PROJECT: $7,000 · OtherGIRLS INCORPORATED OF BOSTON AND LYNN: $5,500 · OtherMARBLEHEAD MUSEUM & HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $6,000 · Other+21 more: $33,750 · Other+21 moreUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $50,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY…SPUR INC: $7,250 · PhilanthropySPUR INC+4 more: $4,500 · Philanthropy+4 moreINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC: $29,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $15,500 · Civil RightsCRISTO REY NETWORK: $25,000 · EducationMARBLEHEAD BOOSTERS CLUB INCORPORATED: $5,000 · EducationIMPACT-U FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · EducationCHICAGO FOOTBALL CLASSIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $1,500 · Education+1 more: $300 · EducationHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $28,000 · Housing & ShelterROSIE'S PLACE INC: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $9,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $4,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · InternationalCenter for Arms Control and: $1,000 · International
Human Services$335,000Other$140,195Philanthropy$61,750Civil Rights$44,500Education$35,800Housing & Shelter$31,000International$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC: $309,900 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC: $29,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $28,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTO REY NETWORK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARBLEHEAD COUNSELING CENTER: $9,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPUR INC: $7,250 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HERREN PROJECT: $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMARBLEHEAD MUSEUM & HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SALEM MISSION INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST ARC INC: $5,880 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARBLEHEAD FOOD PANTRY INC: $5,500 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetSWEDEN FOOD PANTRY: $5,500 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF BOSTON AND LYNN: $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAKES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMARBLEHEAD BOOSTERS CLUB INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $4,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetON COURSE FOUNDATION USA: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGOLDTHWAIT RESERVATION INC: $2,850 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER LOVELL LAND TRUST INC: $2,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO FOOTBALL CLASSIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCenter for Arms Control and: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINDS MATTER COLORADO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY RESTORED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Bail Fund: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANA-FARBER INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBirthday Wishes Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZERO PROSTATE CANCER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPERSON TO PERSON INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MARBLEHEAD COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SPUR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERREN PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MARBLEHEAD MUSEUM & HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SALEM MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST ARC INC ↗
  • Who funds MARBLEHEAD FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds SWEDEN FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF BOSTON AND LYNN ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MARBLEHEAD BOOSTERS CLUB INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT-U FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds ON COURSE FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds GOLDTHWAIT RESERVATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LOVELL LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Greater Houston ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA28.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · People's United Community Foundation of Eastern Massachusetts Inc · Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity Charitable Foundation Inc · Kenneth D Bane Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Coughlin Family Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Coughlin Family Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Northeast Arc Inc: 73% of income from government
  • Plummer Youth Promise Inc: 64% of income from government
  • Girls Incorporated of Boston and Lynn: 28% of income from government
  • International Institute of New England Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Person to Person Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Salem Mission Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Marblehead Counseling Center: 2% of income from government
  • Spur Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Coughlin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph