· Private foundation
The Corita Charitable Trust McGrath & Company LLP
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of THE CORITA CHARITABLE TRUST MCGRATH & COMPANY LLP’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k33 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST | $15,000 |
| MERCHANTS HOUSE | $10,000 |
| WHITBY SCHOOL | $7,500 |
| BRUCE MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| GREENWICH LAND TRUST | $5,000 |
| 564 PARK AVE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION | $4,500 |
| ST PAUL'S SCHOOL | $2,000 |
| ST BARNABAS CHURCH | $2,000 |
| NORTH SHORE ALLIANCE | $1,000 |
| FURKIDS RESCUE SHELTER | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| GREEN VALE SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| KENT SCHOOL ANNUAL ALUMNI FUND | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| ST PHILIPS CHURCH | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WRWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +121%
- TWTHE WHITBY SCHOOL INCORPORATED4× · 2021–2024 · $18k · revenue +39%
- 5P564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- TOTHIRTY ONE SMALL GRANTSone grant, 2019 · $28k
- TNThe New Schoolone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +5%
- PSPARSONS SCHOOL OF DESIGNone grant, 2020 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
To educate the community as to the significance of their architectural and historic heritage through the preservation, protection, improvement, and restoration of sites and buildings in western new york that are of historic or civic…
The primary mission of the Westchester Land Trust is to conserve, maintain and enhance the natural environment and resources of Westchester County and eastern Putnam County. The Trust acquires interests in land exhibiting important natural…
The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…
Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…
Our mission is to spark people's curiosity to explore, steward, and find peace and joy in nature. in service to this, norman bird sanctuary inspires, builds, and engages a community of stewards who preserve, protect, enjoy, and learn from…
To create memorable guest experiences which promote actions to help save species, habitats, and the communities who share those same landscapes
The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…
Acquire land and easements to preserve and enhance the open lands, forests, water resources, scenic areas and historical sights of the Woodstock, NY area. Steward protected lands and offer educational programs and events regarding nature…
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
The waldorf school of garden city educates children to meet the world with purpose, gratitude and respect. our curriculum, inspired by rudolf steiner, progresses in accordance with child development, awakening students to the experience of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Greenwich Land Trust Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hollister House Garden Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO ↗
- Who funds THE WHITBY SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BRUCE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds 564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The New School ↗
- Who funds GREEN VALE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds OUR SISTERS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
- Who funds SCYC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Nassau County Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF LONG ISLAND ANTIQUITIES ↗
- Who funds GOULD ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Old Westbury Gardens Inc ↗
- Who funds KENT SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PLANTING FIELDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Stebbins Fund Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The McGrath Family Charitable Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Leland Deane Family Foundation · The Vytautas Burbulis Charitable Trust · Peggy N & Roger G Gerry Charitable · The Weill Family Foundation · Hugh and Patricia Okane Foundation Co Hugh Okane · The Bahnik Foundation Inc · Ainslie Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Corita Charitable Trust McGrath & Company LLP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bruce Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
- Our Sisters School — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Corita Charitable Trust McGrath & Company LLP?
Find your warmest path to The Corita Charitable Trust McGrath & Company LLP through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.