Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Copwood Hill Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Animals$68kEducation$43kHousing & Shelter$15kFood & Nutrition$9kReligion$5kHealth$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$415k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Missisippi State University Foundation$20,000
AVERY CO HUMANE SOCIETY IN$5,000
Brunswick Co Animal Protective Services$1,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Missisippi State University Foundation: $20k → 24%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 24%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IN
OH
KS
NC
DC
MS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$113k · 8 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against +50% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$113k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+50%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    Mississippi State University Foundation Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue +82%
  • AC
    AVERY CO HUMANE SOCIETY IN
    6× · 2018–2025 · $24k
  • AC
    AVERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $21k · revenue -64%

Funded once

  • HH
    HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF NORTHWEST NORTH CAROLINAgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $14k · revenue +33%
  • GM
    GLOBAL MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • SO
    SOUTHPORT OAK ISLAND INTERCHURCH FELLOWSHIP
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
2
Franklin County Humane Society

Temporary shelter & adoption of homeless pets.

Animals
3
Humane Society of Vero Beach and Indian River County Inc

None

Animals
4
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
5
Humane Society of Davie County

The humane societys misison is to prevent cruelty and suffering among dogs and cats through rescue, adoption, and education.

Animals
6
Hopkins County Humane Society

The mission of the hopkins county humane society is to ensure the humane and compassionate treatment of all animals.

Animals
7
Adopt-a-Dog Inc

To save, socialize and secure loving homes for unwanted or abandoned dogs.

Animals
8
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
9
Philadelphia Animal Welfare Society

Dedicated to saving philadelphias homeless and at-risk pets through rescue, adoption, and provision of veterinary care and other pet owner support services.

Animals
10
Wayne County Humane Society

Finding committed, permanent homes for companion animals in our community; measurably reducing companion animal overpopulation; educating and promoting humane values.

Animals
11
Animal Welfare Society of Monroe

The animal welfare society of monroe (awsom) provides shelter and medical care for companion animals so they are free from abuse, hunger, fear and lonliness, until placing them in responsible, forever homes.

Animals
12
Humane Society of Charlotte Inc

Humane Society of Charlotte mission is to champion the wellbeing of companion animals and strengthen their bond with the people who know, love, and need them.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foothills Canine Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Brunswick Community College Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AVERY CO HUMANE SOCIETY IN: $24,100 · OtherAVERY CO HUMANE SOCIETY INBRUNSWICK COUNTY SHERIFF ANIMAL PROTECTIVE SVCS: $14,853 · OtherBRUNSWICK COUNTY SHERIFF ANIMAL PROTECTIVE SVCSKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT: $11,405 · OtherKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENTBrunswick Community College Foundation Inc: $7,037 · OtherBrunswick Community College Foundation IncCOPLEY OUTREACH CENTER: $7,000 · OtherCOPLEY OUTREACH CENTERGLOBAL MINISTRIES: $3,000 · Other+6 more: $7,800 · Other+6 moreAVERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $20,600 · AnimalsAVERY COUNTY HUMANE …FOOTHILLS CANINE RESCUE INC: $3,000 · AnimalsFOOTHILLS CANINE RES…PAWS-ABILITY INC: $2,000 · AnimalsPAWS-ABILITY INCADOPT AN ANGEL: $1,000 · AnimalsMississippi State University Foundation Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesMississippi State U…HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF NORTHWEST NORTH CAROLINA: $14,000 · Housing & ShelterHOSPITALITY…NEW HOPE CLINIC INC: $2,000 · Health+1 more: $35 · HealthWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 · International
Other$75,195Animals$26,600Human Services$25,000Housing & Shelter$14,000Health$2,035International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMississippi State University Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAVERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $20,600 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF NORTHWEST NORTH CAROLINA: $14,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBrunswick Community College Foundation Inc: $7,037 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPAWS-ABILITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNEW HOPE CLINIC INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetADOPT AN ANGEL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mississippi State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds AVERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF NORTHWEST NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds Brunswick Community College Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILLS CANINE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS-ABILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds ADOPT AN ANGEL ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC8.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Copwood Hill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Copwood Hill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Copwood Hill’s filings →

    More from the funding graph