Skip to content
The Constance and Richard Golber Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Constance and Richard Golber Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$13kReligion$4kHealth$4kEducation$3kInternational$3kScience & Tech$2kArts & Culture$850Environment$550Other$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
5
States reached
$175k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE LOW COU$2,250
COLLEGE AMERICA$1,000
PLAY FOR PINK$100
TEMPLE BETH EL$54
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ANDREW WARSHAW INSTITUTE FOR PANCRE: $100 → 16%KATZ FAMILY LIBRARY - TEMPLE BETH EL: $1k → 17%ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $50 → 13%TUNNEL TO TOWERS: $1k → 11%AUDUBON SOCEITY: $200 → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE LOW COU: $2k → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $3k → 11%COLLEGE AMERICA: $1k → 16%NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $50 → 14%GREENWOOD HOUSE HOSPICE: $100 → 11%A & M FELDMAN FOUNDATION INC: $100 → 12%THE NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM: $600 → 23%PLAY FOR PINK: $390 → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE LOWCOUNTRY: $2k → 10%FRENCHMAN'S CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 11%PLAY FOR PINK: $375 → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE LOW COU: $2k → 10%FRENCHMAN'S CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $550 → 11%PLAY FOR PINK: $350 → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE LOWCOUNTRY: $750 → 10%JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%PLAY FOR PINK: $100 → 17%PORT ROYAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%TEMPLE BETH AM: $2k → 11%PORT ROYAL SOUND FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%SCRIPPS: $1k → 11%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $2k → 11%SCRIPPS INSTITUTE: $300 → 11%FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $100 → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH: $2k → 11%TEMPLE BETH EL: $600 → 11%TEMPLE BETH EL: $100 → 11%TEMPLE BETH EL: $54 → 11%TEMPLE SINAI OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $1k → 11%TEMPLE BETH EL: $18 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
NJ
NE
SC
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7k · 4 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +128% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
20

Total granted

$7k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+128%
+28%

Still filing today

50%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyEnvironmentInternationalCrime & LegalArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE LOW COU
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k
  • FC
    FRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +128%
  • PF
    PLAY FOR PINK INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +119%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +198%
  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH AM
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feldman Family Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Feldman Family Foundation
—
3
Abraham & Florence Mendel Foundation
—
4
Korman Feldman Family Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The Steinman Foundation
—
6
Abraham and Lillian Rosenberg Foundation
—
7
Raymond Mallel Foundation
—
8
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
9
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
10
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
11
The Milstein Family Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is A&M Feldman Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE LOW COU: $3,750 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE LOW COUTEMPLE BETH AM: $2,140 · OtherTEMPLE BETH AMJEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $1,500 · OtherJEWISH NATIONAL FUNDSCRIPPS: $1,200 · OtherSCRIPPSPORT ROYAL FOUNDATION: $1,150 · OtherPORT ROYAL FOUNDATIONTEMPLE SINAI OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $1,100 · OtherTEMPLE SINAI OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INCKATZ FAMILY LIBRARY - TEMPLE BETH EL: $1,000 · OtherKATZ FAMILY LIBRARY - TEMPLE BETH ELCOLLEGE AMERICA: $1,000 · OtherCOLLEGE AMERICATEMPLE BETH EL: $772 · OtherTHE NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM: $600 · Other+5 more: $750 · OtherJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $2,500 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Center Foundation…Community Foundation of the Lowcountry: $2,250 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation of the Lowco…JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH C…FRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $1,750 · PhilanthropyFRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDA…+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,500 · InternationalAMERICAN F…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $100 · InternationalPLAY FOR PINK INC: $1,215 · Crime & LegalSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationPORT ROYAL SOUND FOUNDATION: $500 · EnvironmentNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $50 · EnvironmentSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $250 · Arts & CultureANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $250 · Civil Rights
Other$14,962Philanthropy$8,600International$2,600Crime & Legal$1,215Education$1,000Environment$550Arts & Culture$250Civil Rights$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation of the Lowcountry: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $1,215 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORT ROYAL SOUND FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA&M FELDMAN FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Constance and Richard Golber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Constance and Richard Golber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Constance and Richard Golber’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home