Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Conrad and Ludmila Cafritz Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$71k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of THE CONRAD AND LUDMILA CAFRITZ CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$174k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Michigan Law School$50,000
St Albans School$20,000
Combined Cathedral Crews Rowing Club$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JFCS of Greater Philadelphia: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$293k · 7 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$293k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+33%

Still filing today

57%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsSocial ScienceCivil RightsEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SR
    SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2021 · $57k · revenue +14%
  • JF
    JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    2× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +28%
  • WW
    WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS
    2× · 2017–2019 · $18k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • FC
    FEDERAL CITY COUNCILgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +33%
  • HM
    HIRSHHORN MUSEUM AND SCULPTURE GARDEN
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • HA
    HIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Council of the Americas Inc

Council of the americas is a business organization whose members share a common commitment to economic and social development, open markets, the rule of law, and democracy throughout the americas. the council's membership consists of…

2
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
3
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
4
Corporation of the Washington Latin School

To provide a rigorous, classical education to public school middle and high school students from across the district of columbia.

Education
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
7
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.

Public Benefit
8
The Fund for American Studies

The fund for american studies (tfas) seeks to create a brighter, more prosperous future by preparing young people for leadership and teaching them the ideas of freedom and a free-market economy. founded in 1967, tfas organizes programs for…

9
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
10
Institute for Experiential Learning Inc

The mission of the washington internship institute is to foster students' intellectual, personal, and professional development through individually tailored, quality internships and challenging academic coursework that take full advantage…

Education
11
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
12
Atlantic Council of the United States Inc

The atlantic council, through its research and analysis, promotes constructive leadership and engagement in international affairs based on the central role of the atlantic community in meeting global challenges.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Washington Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Solomon R Guggenheim Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL FOUNDATION OF THE D OF C — $110,000 · OtherPROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL FOUNDATION OF THE D OF CREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $55,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANPENFAULKER FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherPENFAULKER FOUNDATIONFEDERAL CITY COUNCIL — $15,000 · OtherFEDERAL CITY COUNCILHIRSHHORN MUSEUM AND SCULPTURE GARDEN — $10,000 · OtherHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC — $9,500 · Other+6 more — $11,820 · OtherSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION — $57,273 · Arts & CultureSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUND…JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $30,000 · Arts & CultureJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR …+1 more — $2,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyWOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS — $18,000 · Social ScienceJUNIOR TENNIS CHAMPIONS CENTER INC — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsCOMBINED CATHEDRAL CREWS ROWING CLUBINC — $2,700 · Recreation & SportsMANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROW — $5,000 · EducationMERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER — $3,500 · International
Other$231,320Arts & Culture$89,273Philanthropy$20,000Social Science$18,000Recreation & Sports$7,700Education$5,000International$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION — $57,273 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS — $18,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC — $9,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROW — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR TENNIS CHAMPIONS CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMBINED CATHEDRAL CREWS ROWING CLUBINC — $2,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Conrad and Ludmila Cafritz Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph