Skip to content

· Public charity

The Connecticut Project Action Fund Inc

Tcp's 501c4 mobilizes people and partners to advocate for improved systems that better the lives of lower-income or asset-limited people in ct, focusing on economic empowerment through early education, housing, democracy, governance, and financial well-being.

$180k
Granted FY2023
13
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2023.

Public Benefit$319kHuman Services$125kCivil Rights$26kHousing & Shelter$25kCommunity Improvement$15k
02FY2023 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$11,425
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPEN COMMUNITIES ALLIANCE$25,000
NORWALK ACTS$15,000
CENTER FOR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY$15,000
CONNECTICUT NETWORK FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH$15,000
CONNECTICUT NETWORK FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH CO CHILD CARE FOR CT'S FUTURE$15,000
NORTHEAST EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL$15,000
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF CT$11,425
CONNECTICUT CITIZEN ACTION GROUP INC$11,425
COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND$11,425
CONNECTICUT LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS$11,425
BRIDGEPORT GENERATION NOW VOTES$11,425
Individual grant recipient$11,425
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT$11,425
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTHEAST EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL: $15k → 12%CHILD CARE FOR CONNECTICUT FUTURE: $80k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Association for Community Action Inc

The mission of the connecticut association for community action is to strengthen the capacities of its members to empower people in need and improve the communities in which they live.

—
2
American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut Inc

To maintain and promote civil liberties and civil rights within the state of ct, including but not limited to the freedoms of speech, press, association, and religion, and the right to due process of law.

Civil Rights
3
Child Advocates of Connecticut Inc

Child Advocates of Connecticut (CAC) transforms the lives of vulnerable children and youth by providing trained and supervised one-on-one volunteer advocates in the community, classroom and courtroom.

—
4
Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc

The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…

—
5
Connecticut Citizen Research Group Inc

Consumer and environmental protection: We conduct research public education forums and organize residents and coalitions to address consumer and environmental problems.

Environment
6
The Connecticut Construction Industries Association Inc

All activities conducted by the association are to enable it to:a. establish a better understanding between the members and companies in the construction and related industries.b. foster reasonable and just regulations by governments c.…

Employment
7
Connecticut Votes for Animals Inc

CT Votes for Animals (CVA) is a state-wide, grass-roots animal advocacy organization dedicated to improving the lives of CTs animals by championing legislative change. CVA effects policy change by mobilizing animal supporters in…

Animals
8
Connecticut Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Empower a statewide network of caring, consistent volunteer court appointed special advocates to advance the best interests of children who have experienced abuse or neglect so every child can find a safe, permanent home to thrive.

Crime & Legal
9
Connecticut Roundtable On Climate and Jobs

CRCJ seeks to build a worker-oriented environmental movement committed to securing a fair and just transition that protects not only the environment but also the livelihoods of workers and their communities.

Environment
10
Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities Inc

The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…

—
11
Connecticut League of History Organizations

The Connecticut League of History Organizations, DBA the Connecticut League of Museums, unifies and strengthens our state's museums and cultural resources to expand their life capacity and community impact. We are the premier destination…

—
12
Connecticut Bar Association Inc

The mission of the connecticut bar association is to work to advance the principles of justice, the practice of law, the image of the profession and public understanding of the law.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connecticut Network for Children and Youth Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bridgeport Generation Now Votes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YES FOR FREEDOM TO VOTE EARLY: $250,000 · OtherYES FOR FREEDOM TO VOTE EARLYCONNECTICUT NETWORK FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH INC: $30,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT NETWORK FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH INCLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF CONNECTICUT INC: $11,425 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,425 · OtherCONNECTICUT CITIZEN ACTION GROUP INC: $11,425 · OtherCONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesCONNECTICUT ASSOCIATI…Charity Navigator: $15,000 · Human ServicesCharity NavigatorOPEN COMMUNITIES ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 · EducationCT LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $11,425 · EducationNORWALK ACTS INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementBRIDGEPORT GENERATION NOW VOTES: $11,425 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY INC: $15,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC: $11,425 · Civil RightsCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND: $11,425 · Public Benefit
Other$314,275Human Services$95,000Education$36,425Community Improvement$26,425Civil Rights$26,425Public Benefit$11,425

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC: $80,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCONNECTICUT NETWORK FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH INC: $30,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetOPEN COMMUNITIES ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCharity Navigator: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORWALK ACTS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND: $11,425 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGEPORT GENERATION NOW VOTES: $11,425 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC: $11,425 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCT LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $11,425 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCONNECTICUT CITIZEN ACTION GROUP INC: $11,425 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Connecticut Project Action Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Connecticut Project Action Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 39%
  • Connecticut Network for Children and Youth Inc: 70% of income from government
  • Open Communities Alliance Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Norwalk Acts Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Center for Childrens Advocacy Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Connecticut Project Action Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Connecticut Project Action Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Connecticut Project Action’s filings →

More from the funding graph