Skip to content
The Concetta Viggiano Parry Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Concetta Viggiano Parry Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0162% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Animals$45kPublic Benefit$10kEducation$10kReligion$8kCivil Rights$7kHuman Services$5kArts & Culture$4kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$439k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED FOR ANIMALS$9,000
TREASURE COAST ITALIAN ANGELS$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
DOGS & CATS FOREVER$1,290
MT MARIAH CHURCH$1,000
PLYMOUTH MA FRAGMENT SOCIETY$1,000
HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BURKE FOUNDATION$600
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$460
Individual grant recipient$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $1k → 10%GENDER COOL PROJECT: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
NJ
CA
MD
AZ
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$83k · 19 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
29

Total granted

$83k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-5%

Still filing today

26%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DA
    DOGS AND CATS FOREVER
    2× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +25%
  • TB
    THE BURKE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +3%
  • RA
    RESCUE ADOPTION INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $3k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • FP
    FORT PIERCE POLICE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • IO
    IMAGE OF CHRIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
2
Florida Animal Protection Foundation
Animals
3
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals
4
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
5
Paws Against Domestic Violence Inc
Animals
6
Foster and Forever Pet Rescue Inc
Animals
7
Born Free Pet Shelter Inc
—
8
Safe At Last Animal Rescue Inc
Animals
9
Spca of North Florida Inc
Animals
10
Blue Lives Bully Rescue Inc

Dog rescue

—
11
Jl Animal Rescue Inc
Animals
12
Starfish Animal Rescue
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save Our Children; the most unlike its peers is Plymouth Fragment Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED FOR ANIMALS INC: $28,000 · OtherUNITED FOR ANIMALS INCFORT PIERCE POLICE DEPARTMENT: $10,000 · OtherFORT PIERCE POLICE DEPARTMENTNAACP: $6,500 · OtherNAACPIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIMAGE OF CHRIST CHURCH: $5,050 · OtherCAST - ST LUCIE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $4,150 · Other+39 more: $44,372 · Other+39 moreDOGS AND CATS FOREVER: $5,790 · AnimalsDOGS AND CA…RESCUE ADOPTION INC: $2,500 · AnimalsRESCUE ADOP…SUNRISE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · AnimalsSUNRISE HUM…ANIMAL RECOVERY MISSION INC: $2,000 · AnimalsANIMAL RECO…LAURA'S HOUSE: $1,000 · Human ServicesThe GenderCool Project: $1,000 · Human ServicesNIAGARA UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · Education
Other$109,972Animals$12,290Human Services$2,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOGS AND CATS FOREVER: $5,790 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BURKE FOUNDATION INC: $3,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRESCUE ADOPTION INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSUNRISE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetANIMAL RECOVERY MISSION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLYMOUTH FRAGMENT SOCIETY: $1,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetLAURA'S HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe GenderCool Project: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNIAGARA UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE OUR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DOGS AND CATS FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds THE BURKE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE ADOPTION INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL RECOVERY MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH FRAGMENT SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LAURA'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds The GenderCool Project ↗
  • Who funds NIAGARA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SAVE OUR CHILDREN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Concetta Viggiano Parry Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Concetta Viggiano Parry Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Dogs and Cats Forever: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Concetta Viggiano Parry’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home