How much did THE COMMUNITY FUND OF BRONXVILLE grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of THE COMMUNITY FUND OF BRONXVILLE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

speaker

2020

covid purchasepurchase ppeppe cleaningcleaning supplies

2021

covid reliefbundles joyclassgrowthsinceexperiencedtremendous

2022

bundles joygrowthover

2023

musicfacultystudentmusical theatreclasses

2024

musicfacultydedicatedstudentdiversemusical theatretherapy

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $24k
$10k–50k13 grants · $305k
$50k–250k3 grants · $170k

$24,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

EASTCHESTER COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS$60,000
EASTCHESTER VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS$60,000
EASTCHESTER SENIOR PROGRAMS AND SERVICES$50,000
CANCER SUPPORT TEAM$40,000
SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC$40,000
LEGAL SERVICES OF THE HUDSON VALLEY$37,500
TUCKAHOE LIBRARY$25,000
MAXWELL INSTITUTION$25,000
SOUTH EAST CONSORTIUM FOR SPECIAL SERVICES INC$24,000
THE BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF WESTCHESTER$24,000
TUCKAHOE LIBRARY$20,000
AISLING IRISH CENTER$18,713
GRAMATAN VILLAGE INC$16,000
NY PRESBYTERIANLAWRENCE HOSPITAL$15,000
AISLING IRISH CENTER$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $322k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.5M · 20 repeat orgs$269k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.5M

$234k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%

+50%

Still filing today

70%

71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterEmploymentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

EV
EASTCHESTER VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS
7× · 2018–2024 · $403k · revenue +234%
SC
SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $279k · revenue +22%
CS
CANCER SUPPORT TEAM
7× · 2018–2024 · $265k · revenue +70%

Funded once

WC
WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM INC
one grant, 2018 · $52k · revenue -27%
FW
FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC
one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +15%
WJ
WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICESINCgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Home Health Services of Wjcs Inc

Home health services of wjcs is a ny state licensed home care service agency, hhs provides the highest quality services supporting older adults in aging in place while maintaining independence and preserving their dignity.

—

Wmc-New York Inc

Engages in activities that further support, benefit, and carryout the purposes, missions, objectives, and activities of westchester county health care corp.

Health

Community Programs of Westchester

Community programs operates 13 group homes for 95 adults who have intellectual and developmental deficits that require 24/7 care to enable them to be as independent and functional members of the community as possible. various support…

—

The County Chamber of Commerce

The business council of westchester's mission is to work hard to grow the economy, create jobs and build a strong business community in westchester county.

—

Child Care Council of Westchester Inc

Westchester County's leading authority on child care, the Child Care Council of Westchester, Inc. is one of the largest child care resource and referral agencies in the state of New York. A nonprofit, 501(c)(3) agency, the Council plays a…

Human Services

Ywca White Plains & Central Westchester

At the ywca white plains & central westchester, we are dedicated to creating a world free of racism, empowering women, and standing up for social justice. our mission is to eliminate racism, empower women, and promote peace, justice,…

—

Westchester School for Special

To provide services to children and adolescents with developmental disabilities. the school runs preschool and school age programs.

—

Westchester Publicprivate

The organization develops resources to provide services to seniors in westchester county, new york.

Human Services

Westchester Independent Living

Westchester independent living center ("the center") is the leading community advocate, dedicated to improving the quality of life of people with disabiliities by promoting individual self determination and human rights, societal change…

Human Services

White Plains Hospital Medical Center

To offer high quality, acute health care and preventive medical care to all people who live in, work in, or visit westchester county and its surrounding areas.

Health

Mid-Hudson Valley Early Education Center

Develop, maintain, and advance programs to empower special needs children to learn and grow through a variety of learning opportunities and experiences.

Education

The Westchester Medical Practice Pc

The organization is organized and shall be operated exclusively for the sole purpose of supporting and furthering the charitable purpose of newyork-presbyterian/hudson valley.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Ties of Westchester Inc and the most unlike its peers is Iona University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2/46

the rest of the field

597/6,525

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

32/34

Grantees still filing

25/34

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,191,468Health$945,650Human Services$308,315Community Improvement$147,230Housing & Shelter$79,700Employment$68,713Arts & Culture$34,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Westchester and PutnamNY28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Westchester and Putnam · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Field Hall Foundation · Marilynn and John Hill Foundation Inc · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Esmond Nissim Foundation Inc · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · Phelps Community Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Steven a and Marianne M Mills · Raffiani Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE COMMUNITY FUND OF BRONXVILLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EASTCHESTER HISTORICAL SOCIETY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 136161585 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on EASTCHESTER HISTORICAL SOCIETY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 48% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Community Fund of Bronxville?

Find your warmest path to The Community Fund of Bronxville through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE COMMUNITY FUND OF BRONXVILLE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Community Fund of Bronxville?

More from the funding graph

THE COMMUNITY FUND OF BRONXVILLE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Community Fund of Bronxville?

More from the funding graph