How much did THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

transformingchildcarechildrenleadership

2019

—

2020

paymentsstudyanimalschurch'sartemploymentdisorders

2022

systemprivatefort kingyouth agriculturenewshousingabused

2023

accordance arpamodel worksparentingpregnantfoster carestudents teachersresearch

2024

accordance arpaperpetual careexperience youngassistspet ownerspets deathdeath disability

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k9 grants · $67k
$10k–50k35 grants · $755k
$50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
$250k+1 grant · $269k

$22,000

Median grant

States reached

$10M

Total assets

Largest grants

AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION$268,995
MONASTIC FAITH HEALING MINISTRIES PRIORY #180$229,747
EMPOWERED OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$134,000
WINGS OF FAITH FELLOWSHIP CHURCH OF GOD$101,000
EMPOWERED OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$87,588
INTERFAITH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC$86,386
MARION COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC DBA KIMBERLY'S CENTER FOR CHI$78,300
FLORIDA CENTER FOR THE BLIND INC$73,381
FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY VETERANS PARK INC$70,500
HONORING THE FATHER MINISTRIES INC$62,804
REILLY ARTS CENTER$62,750
ST PAUL CENTER FOR BIBLICAL THEOLOGY$62,000
ST JOHN LUTERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL OF OCALA FOUNDATION INC$50,000
XTREME SOULUTIONS INC$44,162
ESTELLA BYRD WHITMAN WELLNESS AND COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC$43,355

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 77% of THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 89% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 20% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FORlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.1M · 39 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +50% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.1M

$3.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%

+50%

Still filing today

82%

59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $969k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthReligionAnimalsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

IE
INTERFAITH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $357k · revenue +25%
EO
EMPOWERED OF CENTRAL FLORIDA
2× · 2023–2024 · $355k · revenue +225% · 36% of their budget
WC
WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
8× · 2017–2024 · $215k · revenue +43%

Funded once

AR
ADVOCACY RESOURCE CENTER MARION INC
2× · 2020–2021 · $410k · revenue -15%
OC
OCALA CIVIC THEATRE INC
one grant, 2020 · $314k · revenue -16% · 31% of their budget
HO
HEART OF FLORIDA HEALTH CENTER INCgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $312k · revenue +249%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Marion County Homeless Council Inc

The mission is to assist the homeless and near-homeless in Marion County, Florida. The organization strives to maximize resources to prevent homelessness and eliminate gaps in services

—

Hospice of Marion County Inc

Hospice of marion county (hmc) provides end-of-life care and services to residents of all ages, regardless of their ability to pay.

Human Services

Marion County Child Advocacy Center

The goal of the Marion County Child Advocacy Center is to provide a safe place for children who are victims of sexual and physical abuse to have their stories clearly heard and begin the healing process.

Crime & Legal

Marion County Humane Society

The mission of the Marion County Humane Society is to provide shelter for abandoned, abused, neglected and home-less animals to work with our rescued animals until we can find forever loving homes for them and to work within the community…

Animals

Arc of Martin County Inc

To empower children and adults with developmental disabilities to achieve their fullest potential.

Human Services

Walk On Water Ministries of Central Florida Inc

Walk On Water is a non-profit organization dedicated to giving individuals the opportunity to experience and bond with horses in a safe and loving environment. We are committed to teaching responsibility, self-confidence

Religion

Manatee County Habitat for Humanity

In partnership with god, manatee county habitat develops resources, educates, and mobilizes people to work alongside families in need, rehabilitating existing homes and building sustainable, affordable homes, thereby improving the quality…

—

House of Hope Orlando Inc

The organization is a residental counseling facility that provides on-site schooling for youth in the program. This work is based on Biblical principals proven to provide workable and successful solutions in restoring troubled teen and…

Religion

Marion Senior Services Inc

To assist the elderly, disabled and disadvantaged residents of marion county to maintain independent living status.

—

Professional Firefighters of Marion

Employment

Harmony Healthcare Orlando Inc

Health

Freedom Ride Inc

To enrich the lives and experiences of children and adults with disabilities in the central florida area through therapeutic horesback riding and related activities.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart of Florida Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is West Chester University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1.0%1/104

the rest of the field

14%

1,688/12,033

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

84 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

77/84

Grantees still filing

65/84

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$4,104,084Human Services$1,373,381Health$593,771Education$579,221Religion$526,141Philanthropy$509,775Youth Development$444,078

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Marion CountyincFL46.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Marion Countyinc · Enchanted Backpack · Palmer Foundation Inc · Clay Electric Foundation Inc · Munroe Regional Health System Inc · The Colen Foundation Inc · Browder Family Foundation · The Lilac Foundation Corporation · Second Harvest Food Bank Of · Mantz Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Wawa Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

14get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WILD HORSEMANSHIP CENTER INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 475069794 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WILD HORSEMANSHIP CENTER INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 60% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Community Foundation For?

Find your warmest path to The Community Foundation For through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

84 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Community Foundation For?

More from the funding graph

THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

84 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Community Foundation For?

More from the funding graph