Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Columbia Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$145k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$323kHuman Services$142kYouth Development$126kRecreation & Sports$69kPhilanthropy$50kEducation$16kReligion$15kAnimals$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
$6,925
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ATLANTA OPERA$56,682
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL MO$15,000
ATLANTA CHAMBER PLAYERS INC$13,000
THE HOWARD SCHOOL INC$12,300
ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC$10,000
PIEDMONT PARK CONSERVANCY$10,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF ATLANTA$7,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF COLUMBIA$6,925
Individual grant recipient$6,000
ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC$5,000
ATLANTA BALLET$1,167
FOX THEATRE INC$996
KUDZU DEFENSE FUND INC$500
OUT FRONT THEATRE COMPANY INC$259
ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC$182
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MOM'S HOUSE: $3k → 20%LOVE INC OF COLUMBIA: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$666k · 15 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
19

Total granted

$666k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+33%

Still filing today

67%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ATLANTA OPERA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $198k · revenue +89%
  • PP
    Piedmont Park Conservancy Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $63k · revenue +77%
  • RW
    ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $16k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • AO
    ASHLAND OPTIMIST FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -38%
  • LC
    Love Columbia Corp Love Columbiagraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +37%
  • AA
    ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
District of Columbia Arts Center

The District of Columbia Arts Center serves the Washington DC area by presenting high caliber and challenging works. It encourages professionalism among artists by providing a forum for educational and cultural exchange. DCAC was founded…

Arts & Culture
2
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra

Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.

Arts & Culture
3
The City Theatre Company Inc

To provide an artistic home for the development and production of contemporary plays that engage and challenge a diverse audience.

Arts & Culture
4
Carpenter Square Theatre Inc

Carpenter Square Theatre Inc entertains, educates, and enriches the community with unedited, live contemporary works. Educational programs serve at-risk teens in the metro area, as well as adults.

Arts & Culture
5
Ballet Theatre Foundation Inc

To create, to present, to preserve, and to extend the great repertoire of classical dancing through exciting performances and educational programming of the highest quality, presented to the widest possible audience. american ballet…

Arts & Culture
6
Educational Theatre Company

The Educational Theatre Company seeks to unlock the potential of children and adults through immersion in theatre arts.

Arts & Culture
7
The Acorn Center for the Performing Arts

To offer a broad range of high-quality entertainment that nurtures cultural experience, participation and community engagement among residents and visitors of all ages, and enhances the economic vitality of the region.

Arts & Culture
8
Center Theatre Inc

To engage and inspire by making arts education and entertainment accessible to our rural communities.

Arts & Culture
9
A Red Orchid Theatre

A Red Orchid Theatre is an ensemble of artists dedicated to the proliferation of live theatre in the modern world.

Arts & Culture
10
Ann Arbor Symphony Orchestra Inc

To nuture a life-long love of music through imaginative and inspiring experiences for the listeners of today and tomorrow.

—
11
Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park

We are Cincinnati's national theater - committed to bringing diverse, engaging works of great artistry to our community, and to putting Cincinnati's artistic excellence in the national spotlight.

Arts & Culture
12
River Oaks Chamber Orchestra

To shape the future of classical music by energizing, modernizing, and personalizing the concert experience.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Ballet Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ansley Park Beautification Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREAT CIRCLE: $129,526 · OtherGREAT CIRCLEPiedmont Park Conservancy Inc: $62,675 · OtherPiedmont Park Conservancy IncBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLUMBIA: $50,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLUMBIAFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF ATLANTA: $15,106 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL MO: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $13,748 · OtherATLANTA CHAMBER PLAYERS INC: $13,000 · Other+17 more: $29,716 · Other+17 moreTHE ATLANTA OPERA INC: $198,011 · Arts & CultureTHE ATLANTA OPERA INCMareck Center for Dance: $90,450 · Arts & CultureMareck Center for DanceROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $16,111 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $3,982 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COLUMBIA AREA: $60,925 · Youth DevelopmentASHLAND OPTIMIST FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyThe Howard School Inc: $12,300 · EducationMDE SCHOOL OF EAST COBB INC: $3,000 · Education+1 more: $429 · EducationLove Columbia Corp Love Columbia: $10,000 · Human ServicesMoms House of Endicott NY Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesCENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 · Animals
Other$328,771Arts & Culture$308,554Youth Development$60,925Philanthropy$50,000Education$15,729Human Services$12,500Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ATLANTA OPERA INC: $198,011 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE: $129,526 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMareck Center for Dance: $90,450 over 4y, 15% of budgetPiedmont Park Conservancy Inc: $62,675 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COLUMBIA AREA: $60,925 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $16,111 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA CHAMBER PLAYERS INC: $13,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetThe Howard School Inc: $12,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMDE SCHOOL OF EAST COBB INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANSLEY PARK BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMoms House of Endicott NY Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetATLANTA BALLET INC: $1,986 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHemet Concert Association: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFOX THEATRE INC F/K/A ATLANTA LANDMARKS INC: $996 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOut Front Theatre Company Inc: $429 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTREES ATLANTA INC: $363 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $205 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ATLANTA OPERA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds Mareck Center for Dance ↗
  • Who funds Piedmont Park Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COLUMBIA AREA ↗
  • Who funds ASHLAND OPTIMIST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA CHAMBER PLAYERS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Howard School Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Love Columbia Corp Love Columbia ↗
  • Who funds MDE SCHOOL OF EAST COBB INC ↗
  • Who funds ANSLEY PARK BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Moms House of Endicott NY Inc ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds Hemet Concert Association ↗
  • Who funds FOX THEATRE INC F/K/A ATLANTA LANDMARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Out Front Theatre Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds TREES ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Antinori Foundation Inc · Charles Loridans Foundation Inc · The Virginia & Charles Brewer Family Foundation · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Veterans United Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Columbia Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Columbia Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Columbia Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Columbia Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Columbia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph