· Private foundation
The Cole Harbour Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AUBURN DRIVE HIGH SCHOOL | $3,582 |
| CONNOR STEVENSON CO THE COLE HARBOU | $2,865 |
| JULIA FORMAN CO THE COLE HARBOUR FO | $2,865 |
| LUKE BENNET CO THE COLE HARBOUR FOU | $2,860 |
| ABBY BUSH CO THE COLE HARBOUR FOUND | $2,507 |
| FAITH KORVELA CO THE COLE HARBOUR F | $2,149 |
| TAYLOR HUBLEY CO THE COLE HARBOUR F | $2,149 |
| SABRINA SMITH CO THE COLE HARBOUR F | $2,149 |
| MADISON TURNER CO THE COLE HARBOUR | $2,149 |
| CAITLIN GREGOR CO THE COLE HARBOUR | $2,149 |
| CIARA MCGINLEY CO THE COLE HARBOUR | $2,149 |
| ASHTON BROWN CO THE COLE HARBOUR FO | $2,149 |
| JOSIE PARROTT CO THE COLE HARBOUR F | $2,149 |
| RYLIN MATHESON CO THE COLE HARBOUR | $2,149 |
| HANNAH GLENNIE CO THE COLE HARBOUR | $2,149 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 0% of grant dollars ($8). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 100% that went abroad ($506k) is mapped below.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Beyond the US: 100% of all-years giving ($506k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
118 repeat relationships: 66 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MTMADISON TURNER CO THE COLE HARBOUR4× · 2022–2025 · $9k
- ABABBY BUSH CO THE COLE HARBOUR FOUND3× · 2023–2025 · $7k
- MMMEGAN MACDONALD CO THE COLE HARBOUR3× · 2021–2023 · $7k
Funded once
- CSCRAIG SUTHERLAND CO THE COLE HARBOUone grant, 2022 · $6k
- RMRYAN MACDONALD CO THE COLE HARBOURone grant, 2022 · $6k
- EBELISHA BENNETT CO THE COLE HARBOURone grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2021–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2021 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 216 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Cole Harbour Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cole Harbour Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Cole Harbour’s filings →