· Private foundation
The Cluthe and William B Oliver Foundation for Health and Aging
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YES PREP PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC | $12,000 |
| FORT BEND COUNTY KIDS & COPS INC | $8,000 |
| CANUTILLO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT | $5,000 |
| BROWNSVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT | $5,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT | $5,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE BRAZOS VALLEY | $5,000 |
| BOWIE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GOOSE CREEK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT | $5,000 |
| PAWNEE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT | $3,000 |
| WE CARE INC FEED THE FRIDGE | $3,000 |
| HIGHLAND PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NEDERLAND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT | $3,000 |
| ARMAND BAYOU ELEMENTARY CLEAR CREEK ISD | $3,000 |
| TERESA OLIVERAS MINISTRIES | $3,000 |
| TURNER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PASADENA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT | $2,000 |
| DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER | $2,000 |
| KICKSTART KIDS | $1,347 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +132%
- FBFORT BEND COUNTY KIDS & COPS INC5× · 2021–2025 · $29k · revenue +59%
- DCDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- SISMITHVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2022 · $5k
- CHCOLONIAL HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NORTH EAST ISDone grant, 2020 · $5k
- BEBUSH ELEMENTARY MIDLAND ISDone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Colorado christian academy provides an innovative christ-centered education that prioritizes academic achievements and individual development of the whole child. in relationship with parents, we will build healthy foundations that result…
Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.
Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.
Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…
Avance creates pathways to economic mobility for predominately latino families through high quality, culturally responsive, two-generation programming that ensures school-readiness for young children and opportunities for parents to build…
Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…
The mission of the charter school is to cultivate within all of our students the mindset, skills, creativity, and commitment to equity essential in becoming globally aware and independently minded citizens.
In an atmosphere of mutual respect and responsibility, the oaks school prepares students to meet the world with the combined wisdom of an intelligent mind, a skilled hand, and a compassionate heart.
The fund for american studies (tfas) seeks to create a brighter, more prosperous future by preparing young people for leadership and teaching them the ideas of freedom and a free-market economy. founded in 1967, tfas organizes programs for…
To equip families with the tools they need to become self-sufficent members of the community.
The mission of dc bilingual public charter school is to create a learning community that ensures high academic achievement for all students in both spanish and english, develops leadership, and values all cultures.
Building educator excellence to give all students the opportunity for success.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is After-School All-Stars and the most unlike its peers is Teresa Oliveras Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FORT BEND COUNTY KIDS & COPS INC ↗
- Who funds DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds YES Prep Public Schools Inc ↗
- Who funds CULINARY ENDOWMENT AND SCHOLARSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds FORTRESS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Teresa Oliveras Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS ↗
- Who funds ARISTOI CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN TEXAS ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Kick Drugs Out of America Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Share Our Strength · Foundation for Inspiration & Recognition of Scienc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Cluthe and William B Oliver Foundation for Health and Aging funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Cluthe and William B Oliver Foundation for Health and Aging?
Find your warmest path to The Cluthe and William B Oliver Foundation for Health and Aging through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.