Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cincinnati Foundation for the Aged

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.2M
Granted FY2026still arriving
14
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$550k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$9.3MHuman Services$4.6MPhilanthropy$1.3M
02FY2026 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $188k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $893k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$130,983
Median grant
2
States reached
$37M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION$550,000
OTTERBEIN SENIOR LIFESTYLE CHOICES$341,490
ST CHARLES CARE CENTER VILLAGE AND LODGE$252,626
BAPTIST LIFE COMMUNITIES$232,800
COVINGTON LADIES HOME$227,400
CEDAR VILLAGE$208,800
MADONNA MANOR$130,983
EPIC HOUSE$92,750
Individual grant recipient$38,100
BAYLEY SENIOR CARE$36,000
Individual grant recipient$36,000
COTTINGHAM RETIREMENT CENTER$30,000
Individual grant recipient$24,000
MERCY FRANCISCAN AT WEST PARK$23,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST MARGARET HALL: $72k → 16%ST MARGARET HALL: $72k → 16%ST MARGARET HALL: $57k → 16%ST MARGARET HALL: $36k → 16%ST MARGARET HALL: $35k → 16%ST MARGARET HALL: $33k → 16%ST MARGARET HALL: $14k → 16%ST MARGARET HALL: $9k → 16%ST MARGARET HALL: $3k → 16%BAYLEY PLACE: $137k → 16%BAYLEY PLACE: $125k → 16%BAYLEY PLACE: $105k → 16%BAYLEY PLACE: $83k → 16%BAYLEY PLACE: $81k → 16%BAYLEY PLACE: $56k → 16%BAYLEY SENIOR CARE: $36k → 16%BAYLEY SENIOR CARE: $36k → 16%BAYLEY PLACE: $36k → 16%BAYLEY PLACE: $29k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 21 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2026, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
0

Total granted

$16M
$0

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MADONNA MANOR INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $1.4M · revenue +15%
  • CL
    COVINGTON LADIES HOME INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $1.0M · revenue +35%
  • BS
    BAYLEY SENIOR CARE
    10× · 2017–2026 · $724k · revenue +32%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Carmelite Sisters of the Divine Heart of Jesus of Kentucky

    The carmelite sisters of the divine heart of jesus of kentucky strive to maintain our home as a true home away from home for our residents. our residents are senior citizens and disabled residents.

    —
    2
    The Villas At St Therese

    The organization is a roman catholic institution sponsored by thecarmelite sisters for the aged and infirm. the organization's missionis to provide a secure affordable apartment setting for middle-incomeseniors with an emphasis on…

    —
    3
    St Leonard

    As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

    Housing & Shelter
    4
    Carmel Residence Inc

    Carmel residence, inc., is part of a family of healthcare and residential service organizations committed to providing quality care and life enriching opportunities to the aging and those in need of a caring, christian environment.

    Housing & Shelter
    5
    Mcv Health Care Facilities Inc

    See schedule othe mission of christian village communities is to guide older adults to joyful and purposeful life experiences in a faith-filled community.care is the heart and soul of everything we do. we are devoted to maintaining the…

    Health
    6
    Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

    Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

    —
    7
    The Commons of Providence

    As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

    Health
    8
    Mother Angeline Mccrory Manor Inc

    Mother angeline mccrory manor provides community care and services in conformance with roman catholic church theology; philosophy; teachings; and doctrines, respecting and building on the mission, philosophy, and values of the carmelite…

    —
    9
    St Clare Commons

    As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

    Housing & Shelter
    10
    Lourdes Assisted Living Corporation

    Lourdes senior community, inspired by the gospel of jesus and sponsored by the dominican sisters of peace, provides a broad continuum of care for seniors and their families. all who administer at lourdes honor the uniqueness of each person…

    —
    11
    St Joseph Residence Inc

    St. joseph residence, a skilled nursing home, and marian heights apartments, a residential apartment facility, and trinity terrace & monarch meadows, a community-based residential facility sponsored by catholic health international. we…

    —
    12
    Franciscan Care Center

    As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mt Healthy Christian Home Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Cincinnati Jewish Seniors formerly Jewish Home of Cincinnati Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/10
    Grantees still filing
    6/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    OTTERBEIN: $2,754,778 · OtherOTTERBEINST CHARLES CARE CENTER VILLAGE AND LODGE: $1,534,413 · OtherST CHARLES CARE CENTER VILLAGE AND LODGECOTTINGHAM RETIREMENT CENTER: $1,037,578 · OtherCOTTINGHAM RETIREMENT CENTERCOVINGTON LADIES HOME INC: $1,001,474 · OtherCOVINGTON LADIES HOME INCOTTERBEIN SENIOR LIFESTYLE CHOICES: $710,440 · OtherOTTERBEIN SENIOR LIFESTYLE CHOICESEPIC HOUSE: $650,323 · OtherEPIC HOUSEMERCY FRANCISCAN AT WEST PARK: $359,807 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $334,100 · Other+6 more: $574,070 · Other+6 moreFoundation for Cincinnati Jewish Seniors formerly Jewish Home of Cincinnati Inc: $2,620,293 · HealthFoundation for Cincinnati J…MADONNA MANOR INC: $1,413,654 · HealthMADONNA MANOR INC+2 more: $143,100 · HealthTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $1,835,100 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER…BLC INC: $1,347,306 · Housing & ShelterBAYLEY SENIOR CARE: $724,042 · Human ServicesST MARGARET HALL: $331,482 · Human Services
    Other$8,956,983Health$4,177,047Philanthropy$1,835,100Housing & Shelter$1,347,306Human Services$1,055,524

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFoundation for Cincinnati Jewish Seniors formerly Jewish Home of Cincinnati Inc: $2,620,293 over 10y, 53% of budgetTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $1,835,100 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMADONNA MANOR INC: $1,413,654 over 10y, 2.0% of budgetCOVINGTON LADIES HOME INC: $1,001,474 over 10y, 15% of budgetBAYLEY SENIOR CARE: $724,042 over 10y, 0.5% of budgetST MARGARET HALL: $331,482 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetMT HEALTHY CHRISTIAN HOME INC: $136,045 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCARMEL MANOR INC: $82,600 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SACRED HEART HOME: $60,500 over 8y, 2.4% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Foundation for Cincinnati Jewish Seniors formerly Jewish Home of Cincinnati Inc ↗
    • Who funds THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds MADONNA MANOR INC ↗
    • Who funds BLC INC ↗
    • Who funds COVINGTON LADIES HOME INC ↗
    • Who funds BAYLEY SENIOR CARE ↗
    • Who funds ST MARGARET HALL ↗
    • Who funds MT HEALTHY CHRISTIAN HOME INC ↗
    • Who funds CARMEL MANOR INC ↗
    • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SACRED HEART HOME ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Bahmann FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Bahmann Foundation · Evelyn W Dunn Charitable Trust McLaughlin

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Cincinnati Foundation for the Aged funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cincinnati Foundation for the Aged. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to The Cincinnati Foundation for the Aged?

      Find your warmest path to The Cincinnati Foundation for the Aged through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Cincinnati Foundation for the Aged’s filings →

      More from the funding graph