Skip to content
The Christian Giving Fund at a glance

· Private foundation

The Christian Giving Fund

Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$33k
Granted FY2018
8
Grants FY2018
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

60% of The Christian Giving Fund’s FY2018 grant dollars went to Northern Piedmont Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2018 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

01What it funds
01FY2018 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k7 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$2,700
Median grant
3
States reached
$472k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$19,500
THE MENOKIN FOUNDATION$3,000
PREVENT CANCER FOUNDATION$3,000
ST STEPHENS & ST AGNES SCHOOL$2,700
PRESERVATION VIRGINIA$2,500
MUSEUM OF EARLY SOUTHERN DECOR ART$1,000
MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION$400
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION$400
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MUSEUM OF EARLY SOUTHERN DECOR ART: $1k → 15%NORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%ST STEPHENS & ST AGNES SCHOOL: $3k → 9%THE MENOKIN FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%PRESERVATION VIRGINIA: $3k → 22%FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION: $400 → 8%PREVENT CANCER FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $19,500 · PhilanthropyNORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONTHE MENOKIN FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MENOKIN FOUNDATIONPrevent Cancer Foundation aka Cancer Research & Prevention Fndn: $3,000 · HealthPrevent Ca…ST STEPHEN'S AND ST AGNES SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,700 · EducationST STEPHE…ASSOCIATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF VA ANTIQUITIES: $2,500 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF EARLY SOUTHERN DECOR ART: $1,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $400 · OtherMOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION: $400 · Other
Philanthropy$22,500Health$3,000Education$2,700Arts & Culture$2,500Other$1,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $19,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPrevent Cancer Foundation aka Cancer Research & Prevention Fndn: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MENOKIN FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST STEPHEN'S AND ST AGNES SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF VA ANTIQUITIES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Christian Giving Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Christian Giving Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christian Giving’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home