Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Chingos Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$111k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$368kAnimals$221kEducation$198kArts & Culture$85kCrime & Legal$21kPhilanthropy$10kHuman Services$7k
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUDUBON CENTER FOR BIRDS OF PREY$20,000
PENN MUSEUM$10,000
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY - FALLINGWATER$10,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY IN NEW YORK-ADIRONDACK CHAPTER$10,000
GERMAN MASONTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,000
AVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER OF APPALACHIA INC$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$5,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY - FLORIDA CHAPTER$5,000
COOPERS ROCK FOUNDATION$5,000
MON RIVER TRAILS CONSERVANCY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA-DARDEN SCHOOL$5,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY - WEST VIRGINIA$5,000
CORNELL UNIVERSITY LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGY$3,500
WEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN$2,500
ADIRONDACK CENTER FOR LOON CONSERVATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 58% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY - FALLINGWATER: $10k → 11%GERMAN MASONTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $5k → 17%PENN MUSEUM: $15k → 22%NATURE CONSERVANCY EASTERN NY CHAPTER: $5k → 9%NATURE CONSERVANCY IN NEW YORK-ADIRONDACK CHAPTER: $10k → 13%BARNEVELD FREE LIBRARY: $5k → 16%NATURE CONSERVANCY - FLORIDA CHAPTER: $5k → 11%AUDUBON CENTER FOR BIRDS OF PREY: $20k → 15%FLORIDA LEGAL SERVICES INC: $7k → 19%NATURE CONSERVANCY - WEST VIRGINIA: $5k → 17%AVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER OF APPALACHIA INC: $5k → 19%FLORIDA ODYSSEY OF THE MIND - PALMS REGION: $5k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA-DARDEN SCHOOL: $5k → 8%STOWE LAND TRUST: $5k → 9%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY - FALLINGWATER: $10k → 11%GERMAN MASONTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $5k → 17%PENN MUSEUM: $10k → 22%NATURE CONSERVANCY EASTERN NY CHAPTER: $5k → 9%NATURE CONSERVANCY IN NEW YORK-ADIRONDACK CHAPTER: $10k → 13%NATURE CONSERVANCY - FLORIDA CHAPTER: $5k → 11%PALM BEACH COUNTY LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $6k → 11%AUDUBON CENTER FOR BIRDS OF PREY: $15k → 15%NATURE CONSERVANCY - WEST VIRGINIA: $5k → 17%AVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER OF APPALACHIA INC: $5k → 19%FLORIDA ODYSSEY OF THE MIND - PALMS REGION: $5k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA-DARDEN SCHOOL: $5k → 8%STOWE LAND TRUST: $5k → 9%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY - FALLINGWATER: $10k → 11%PENN MUSEUM: $10k → 22%NATURE CONSERVANCY IN NEW YORK-ADIRONDACK CHAPTER: $10k → 13%AUDUBON CENTER FOR BIRDS OF PREY: $15k → 15%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY - FALLINGWATER: $10k → 11%PENN MUSEUM: $10k → 22%NATURE CONSERVANCY IN NEW YORK-ADIRONDACK CHAPTER: $10k → 13%AUDUBON CENTER FOR BIRDS OF PREY: $15k → 15%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY - FALLINGWATER: $10k → 11%PENN MUSEUM: $10k → 22%NATURE CONSERVANCY IN NEW YORK-ADIRONDACK CHAPTER: $10k → 13%AUDUBON CENTER FOR BIRDS OF PREY: $15k → 15%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY - FALLINGWATER: $10k → 11%PENN MUSEUM: $10k → 22%AUDUBON CENTER FOR BIRDS OF PREY: $15k → 15%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY - FALLINGWATER: $10k → 11%PENN MUSEUM: $10k → 22%AUDUBON CENTER FOR BIRDS OF PREY: $15k → 15%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY - FALLINGWATER: $10k → 11%PENN MUSEUM: $10k → 22%AUDUBON CENTER FOR BIRDS OF PREY: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NY
PA
NJ
WV
VA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$862k · 25 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
5

Total granted

$862k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+136%

Still filing today

40%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +116%
  • GM
    GERMAN MASONTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +99%
  • AC
    AVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER OF APPALACHIA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • MA
    MORGANTOWN AREA MOUNTAIN BIKE ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • RR
    Reef Relief Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +136%
  • PB
    PALM BEACH COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION - GIFT DRIVE
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
2
The Adirondack Council Inc

The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…

Environment
3
Lake George Land Conservancy Inc

Dedicated to permanently preserve the natural, scenic and recreational resources of the Lake George Basin.

Environment
4
Genesee Land Trust Inc

Genesee Land Trust preserves and protects natural lands and waterways that enhance the quality of life in the Greater Rochester region - providing wildlife habitat, locally grown food, and connections to nature.

Environment
5
Genesee Valley Conservancy Inc

Protection of important natural resources, open space, habitat and agricultural lands in the Genesee River watershed through the use of land acquisition and conservation easements. Continued on Schedule O. Provide planning services to…

Environment
6
The Forest Park Conservancy

To protect and restore the ecological health of forest park and marquam nature park, maintain and enhance their extensive trails networks, promote equitable access, and inspire diverse community appreciation and stewardship of these iconic…

Environment
7
Warren Library Association

The mission of the warren library association is to provide all citizens in its service area access to library materials and information services which address the needs and expand the aspirations of the community for formal and lifelong…

—
8
Longneck Manor Conservation Foundation

To create memorable guest experiences which promote actions to help save species, habitats, and the communities who share those same landscapes

Animals
9
Gardiner Library Board of Trustees

The Gardiner Library Board of Trustees operates the public library that serves the Town of Gardiner and the surrounding areas of New York State.

Education
10
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
11
Kennebunk Land Trust

Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.

Environment
12
Mount Desert Land and Garden Preserve

The mission of the mount desert land & garden preserve is to conserve and share the beauty of our historic lands and gardens.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stowe Land Trust; the most unlike its peers is Avian Conservation Center of Appalachia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
13/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUDUBON CENTER FOR BIRDS OF PREY: $125,000 · OtherAUDUBON CENTER FOR BIRDS OF PREYPENN MUSEUM: $85,000 · OtherPENN MUSEUMNATURE CONSERVANCY IN NEW YORK-ADIRONDACK CHAPTER: $65,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY IN NEW YORK-ADIRONDACK CHAPTERNATURE CONSERVANCY - FLORIDA CHAPTER: $40,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY - FLORIDA CHAPTERMON RIVER TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $40,000 · OtherMON RIVER TRAILS CONSERVANCYCOOPERS ROCK FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · OtherCOOPERS ROCK FOUNDATION INCGERMAN MASONTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $40,000 · OtherGERMAN MASONTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARYUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA-DARDEN SCHOOL: $40,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA-DARDEN SCHOOLNATURE CONSERVANCY - WEST VIRGINIA: $40,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY - WEST VIRGINIA+12 more: $110,000 · Other+12 moreAVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER OF APPALACHIA INC: $35,000 · EducationAVIAN CONSERVATI…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $30,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE …Cornell University: $28,000 · EducationCornell Universi…Barneveld Free Library Association: $22,500 · EducationBarneveld Free L…ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $16,000 · EducationST LAWRENCE UNIV…WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $80,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN PENNSYL…STOWE LAND TRUST: $25,000 · EnvironmentSTOWE LAND TRUS…WEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentWEST VIRGINIA B…+1 more: $2,500 · EnvironmentADIRONDACK CENTER FOR LOON CONSERVATION: $15,000 · AnimalsTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HERKIMER AND ONEIDA COUNTIES INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$625,000Education$131,500Environment$127,500Animals$15,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGERMAN MASONTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $40,000 over 8y, 7.0% of budgetAVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER OF APPALACHIA INC: $35,000 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $28,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTOWE LAND TRUST: $25,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBarneveld Free Library Association: $22,500 over 8y, 10% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $20,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetADIRONDACK CENTER FOR LOON CONSERVATION: $15,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HERKIMER AND ONEIDA COUNTIES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA LEGAL SERVICES INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetReef Relief Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds GERMAN MASONTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds AVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER OF APPALACHIA INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds STOWE LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Barneveld Free Library Association ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ADIRONDACK CENTER FOR LOON CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HERKIMER AND ONEIDA COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Reef Relief Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA6.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Chingos Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Chingos Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 39%
  • Florida Legal Services Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Stowe Land Trust: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Chingos Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Chingos Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chingos’ filings →

More from the funding graph