Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Chasen Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2019
14
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Education$125kHuman Services$59kReligion$36kPhilanthropy$22kArts & Culture$6kHealth$3kAnimals$525International$500Other$0
02FY2019 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k10 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $66k
$2,207
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROWEST JEWISH DAY SCHOOL$20,100
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$18,000
NFS LLC$17,693
HEBREW COLLEGE$10,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL OF NATICK$5,267
MARTHA'S VINEYARD FILM SOCIETY$2,500
TEMPLE ADATH YESHURUN$2,207
BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSPITAL$1,000
AID FOR CANCER RESEARCH$1,000
SOCIALEXPRESSCOM$300
Individual grant recipient$205
HAZAK$88
ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE$25
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM: $360 → 7%SURVIVOR TAILS ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $500 → 8%BRANDEIS WOMEN'S STUDIES: $205 → 8%MARTHA'S VINEYARD FILM SOCIETY: $3k → 8%BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSPITAL: $1k → 16%SOCIALEXPRESSCOM: $300 → 11%TEMPLE ADATH YESHURUN: $2k → 7%METROWEST JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $31k → 8%MARTIN SOLOMON MEDICAL EDUCATION SCHOLARS: $500 → 16%HAZAK: $88 → 7%METROWEST JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $31k → 8%MARTIN SOLOMON MEDICAL EDUCATION SCHOLARS: $500 → 16%METROWEST JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $20k → 8%ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE: $25 → 16%HEBREW COLLEGE: $20k → 8%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $25 → 16%HEBREW COLLEGE: $12k → 8%COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES: $3k → 16%HEBREW COLLEGE: $10k → 8%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $500 → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $22k → 8%AID FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $1k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $19k → 8%AID FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $250 → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $18k → 8%AID FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $250 → 16%TEMPLE ISRAEL OF NATICK: $22k → 8%TEMPLE ISRAEL OF NATICK: $5k → 8%TEMPLE ISRAEL OF NATICK: $5k → 8%CANTORS FINE ARTS FUND: $500 → 8%RABBI DISCRETIONARY FUND: $500 → 8%SISTERHOOD OF TEMPLE ISRAEL: $119 → 8%ZAMIR CHORAL OF BOSTON: $2k → 8%JEWISH BIG BROTHER BIG SISTER: $1k → 8%ZAMIR CHORAL OF BOSTON: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$220k · 7 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$220k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+20%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MJ
    METROWEST JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC ATTN F DAVID ROTHKOPF
    3× · 2017–2019 · $82k · revenue -5%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $58k
  • HC
    HEBREW COLLEGE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $42k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • JB
    JEWISH BIG BROTHER & BIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +20%
  • ST
    SURVIVOR TAILS ANIMAL RESCUE
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue -6%
  • CF
    CANTORS FINE ARTS FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Jewish Film Inc

The organization celebrates the richness of the jewish experience through film and media. throughout the year, the festival engages and inspires the community to explore the full spectrum of jewish life, values and culture.

—
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
The Academy for Jewish Religion

The academy for jewish religion serves the needs of the jewish people by ordaining rabbis and cantors and training leaders. we affirm our commitment to a vibrant and inclusive jewish pluralism; to an interweaving of sacred texts, critical…

—
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
5
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
6
Jewish Arts Collaborative Inc

To explore and present the rich, diverse, and creative world of jewish arts and culture-past, present, and future-to the widest possible audience, in venues across greater boston. through a broad range of programming spanning the…

—
7
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
8
Kollel of Greater Boston Inc

Advanced jewish education

—
9
Aish Campus Boston Inc

Education of jewish college students

Religion
10
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
11
Jewish Education in Media Inc Dba Jbs Jewish Broadcasting Service

Jewish education in media's educational efforts are disseminated via television, electronic media, the internet and other teaching tools and methods. jewish education in media's primary effort is the jewish broadcasting service (jbs), a…

Arts & Culture
12
Young Judaea Global Inc

Young judaea is a diverse community that educates and empowers jewish youth to deeply engage with israel and to lead positive change for the jewish people, israel and the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc; the most unlike its peers is Survivor Tails Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

METROWEST JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC ATTN F DAVID ROTHKOPF: $81,500 · EducationMETROWEST JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC ATTN F DAVID ROTHKOPFHEBREW COLLEGE: $42,150 · EducationHEBREW COLLEGEJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $58,200 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICESTEMPLE ISRAEL OF NATICK: $32,871 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF NATICKNFS LLC: $17,693 · OtherNFS LLC+13 more: $7,829 · Other+13 moreMARTHA'S VINEYARD FILM SOCIETY INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureZAMIR CHORALE OF BOSTON INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $3,200 · PhilanthropyJEWISH BIG BROTHER & BIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON: $1,000 · PhilanthropySURVIVOR TAILS ANIMAL RESCUE: $500 · AnimalsJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $500 · International
Education$123,650Other$116,593Arts & Culture$5,000Philanthropy$4,200Animals$500International$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETROWEST JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC ATTN F DAVID ROTHKOPF: $81,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetHEBREW COLLEGE: $42,150 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $3,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD FILM SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetZAMIR CHORALE OF BOSTON INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAID FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $1,500 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetJEWISH BIG BROTHER & BIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METROWEST JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC ATTN F DAVID ROTHKOPF ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD FILM SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ZAMIR CHORALE OF BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds AID FOR CANCER RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH BIG BROTHER & BIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON ↗
  • Who funds SURVIVOR TAILS ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Chasen Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Chasen Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Zamir Chorale of Boston Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Martha's Vineyard Film Society Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Metrowest Jewish Day School Inc Attn F David Rothkopf: 2% of income from government
  • Hebrew College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chasen Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph