Skip to content
The Charlotte Hungerford Hospital at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Charlotte Hungerford Hospital

To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

$92k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$2.5MHuman Services$323kHealth$10kFood & Nutrition$6kYouth Development$6kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $53,320, the rows itemized in this filing. The $92,420 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $39,100 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$9,820
Median grant
1
States reached
$212M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Northwestern Connecticut YMCA$10,000
Partners for Sustainable Healthy Communities Inc$10,000
Torrington Police Activities League Inc$9,820
Northwest Connecticut Assoc For the Arts$8,000
Maria Seymour Brooker Memorial Inc$8,000
Cancer Care Fund of the Litchfield Hills$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$362k · 4 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$362k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-12%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’22’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTHWESTERN CT YMCA INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $317k · revenue +56%
  • PF
    PARTNERS FOR SUSTAINABLE HEALTHY COMMUNITIES INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $16k · revenue 0%
  • TP
    TORRINGTON POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $16k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • NO
    NEW OPPORTUNITIES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $16k · revenue -12%
  • CC
    Connecticut Challenge Inc DBA Mission Your Mission CT Challenge
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -86%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Cancer Foundation Inc

To provide funds to benefit families affected by cancer and to support cancer research and education.

—
2
Connecticut Citizen Action Group Inc

We encourage Connecticut residents to participate in government and their communities and we conduct public interest lobbying to advocate for consumer and environmental concerns.

—
3
The Hartford Chamber of Commerce Incorporated

To compete aggressively and successfully for jobs, talent and capital.

—
4
Chamber of Commerce of Eastern Connecticut Inc

The Chamber of Commerce of Eastern Connecticut, Inc. is a collaborative of business and community leaders dedicated to securing and enhancing the economic vitality of eastern Connecticut.

—
5
The Connecticut Center for Nursing Workforce Inc

To foster collaborations to ensure a highly educated, diverse and sustainable nursing workforce to support the healthcare needs of connecticut residents.

Health
6
Chamber of Commerce of Northwest Ct

Advance the economic, industrial, cultural and civic welfare of Northwest Connecticut by promoting the physical, economic and human resources of the area

—
7
Connecticut Health Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
8
Connecticut Bankers Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
9
Connecticut Roundtable On Climate and Jobs

CRCJ seeks to build a worker-oriented environmental movement committed to securing a fair and just transition that protects not only the environment but also the livelihoods of workers and their communities.

Environment
10
Connecticut Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons Inc

Professional organization of connecticut plastic surgeons

—
11
Connecticut Community Care Inc

Connecticut community care, inc provides person-centered care coordination and transition services for elders and individuals with disabilities to help ensure they can live safely in the place they choose to live. people served experience…

Health
12
Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc

The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Connecticut Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners for Sustainable Healthy Communities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHWEST CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $8,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHWESTERN CT YMCA INC: $317,497 · Human ServicesNORTHWESTERN…Connecticut Challenge Inc DBA Mission Your Mission CT Challenge: $10,000 · HealthThe Cancer Care Fund of The Litchfield Hills Inc: $7,500 · HealthPARTNERS FOR SUSTAINABLE HEALTHY COMMUNITIES INC: $16,000 · EducationNEW OPPORTUNITIES INC: $16,000 · OtherTORRINGTON POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE INC: $15,820 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $13,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$2,508,000Human Services$317,497Health$17,500Education$16,000Other$16,000Youth Development$15,820Arts & Culture$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetNORTHWESTERN CT YMCA INC: $317,497 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetPARTNERS FOR SUSTAINABLE HEALTHY COMMUNITIES INC: $16,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNEW OPPORTUNITIES INC: $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORRINGTON POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE INC: $15,820 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMARIA SEYMOUR BROOKER MEMORIAL: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Northwest Connecticut…Northwest Community B…The Connecticut Commu…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Northwest Connecticut Community Foundation IncCT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northwest Connecticut Community Foundation Inc · Northwest Community Bank Foundation Inc · The Connecticut Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Charlotte Hungerford Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Charlotte Hungerford Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 70%
  • New Opportunities Inc: 70% of income from government
  • Partners for Sustainable Healthy Communities Inc: 68% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charlotte Hungerford Hospital’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home