Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Charles Irwin Travelli Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$141k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$11MHealth$120kHuman Services$60k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$120,800
Median grant
4
States reached
$985k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH$141,000
CLARK UNIVERSITY$135,000
KEENE STATE COLLEGE$132,500
SIMMONS COLLEGE$132,500
MASSACHUSETTS COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS$128,000
UNIVERSITY OF MAINE$127,500
BATES COLLEGE$120,800
COLBY COLLEGE$105,000
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$102,000
BOWDOIN COLLEGE$97,500
MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE$92,000
CAMBRIDGE COLLEGE$90,400
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$67,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC: $10k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC: $10k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC: $10k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC: $10k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC: $10k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 18 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$11M
$40k

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +46%
  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $871k · revenue +110%
  • PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $831k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • UO
    UUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL
    one grant, 2017 · $40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
4
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
5
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Reed Institute

The mission of Reed College is to provide education in the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
8
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
11
Bryant University

Bryant University's mission is to educate and inspire students to discover their passion and become innovative leaders with character around the world.

Education
12
Nichols College

Nichols college strives to develop tomorrow's leaders through a dynamic, career-focused business education. the college transforms students into successful graduates who respond to challenges, are eager for responsibility, and assume…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University and the most unlike its peers is Peak Movement Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY — $1,026,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITYSIMMONS UNIVERSITY — $952,550 · EducationSIMMONS UNIVERSITYNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $870,500 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE — $831,100 · EducationPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGETrustees of Tufts College — $744,500 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeCAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC — $740,400 · EducationCAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INCBowdoin College — $668,475 · EducationBowdoin CollegeThe President and Trustees of Colby College — $666,000 · EducationThe President and Trustees of Colby CollegePresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $587,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Middlebury CollegeKEENE STATE COLLEGE — $956,500 · OtherKEENE STATE COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF MAINE — $915,004 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MAINEMASSACHUSETTS COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS — $898,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTSUNIVERISTY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH — $734,250 · OtherUNIVERISTY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTHBECKER COLLEGE — $367,900 · OtherBECKER COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH — $289,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH+3 more — $232,250 · OtherWINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC — $60,000 · Human Services
Education$7,087,025Other$4,392,904Human Services$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY — $1,026,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSIMMONS UNIVERSITY — $952,550 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $870,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE — $831,100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $744,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC — $740,400 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBowdoin College — $668,475 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe President and Trustees of Colby College — $666,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $587,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBECKER COLLEGE — $367,900 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPEAK MOVEMENT INC — $120,000 over 3y, 71% of budgetWINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SIMMONS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds Bowdoin College
  • Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College
  • Who funds BECKER COLLEGE
  • Who funds PEAK MOVEMENT INC
  • Who funds WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Charles Irwin Travelli Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Trustees of Tufts College11% of income from government
  • Northeastern University4% of income from government
  • Trustees of Clark University2% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College0% of income from government
  • Simmons University0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Charles Irwin Travelli Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Charles Irwin Travelli Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph