Skip to content

· Public charity

The Center for Regional Strategies Inc

The center for regional strategies, inc.

$863k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$190k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Community Improvement$574kArts & Culture$190kEmployment$135kScience & Tech$132kHuman Services$100kSocial Science$22kEducation$15k
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 20 grants below total $833,041, the rows itemized in this filing. The $863,119 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,078 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $474k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $354k
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NIAGARA ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER$190,000
UPSTATE VENTURE CONNECT CORPORATION$100,000
ENDEAVOR WESTERN NEW YORK INC$63,750
OLEAN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$47,600
19 IDEAS INC$42,500
URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC$42,500
NET POSITIVE INC$42,500
DEVUPS CO (START UP GRIND)$42,500
MICHIGAN STREET AFRICAN AMERICAN HERITAGE CORRIDOR COMMISSION$40,000
BROADWAY MARKET MANAGEMENT INC$35,000
BOOTSECTOR INC$34,000
GREY ZIFF LLC$25,500
NEXT CORPS INC$21,781
NORTHLAND WORKFORCE TRAINING CENTER$20,000
SOUTHERN TIER WEST DEVELOPMENT$18,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $134k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC: $43k → 14%NET POSITIVE INC: $43k → 13%BOOTSECTOR INC: $34k → 13%NET POSITIVE INC: $15k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of The Center for Regional Strategies Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 80%.

The Center for Regional Strategies Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 20% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Erie Economic Development Corporation
—
2
Greater Rochester Enterprise Inc

Gre promotes regional assets and expertise to attract new business investments and foster business growth and retention in the region. as a trusted advisor, gre connects business executives with the right people and the right resources to…

Community Improvement
3
Adirondack Economic Development Corp

To foster and support the growth of sustainable North Country communities through providing assistance to aspiring entrepreneurs and existing small business owners.

Community Improvement
4
Wayne Economic Development Corporation

The corporation was formed to lessen the burdens of government and act in the public interest; to facilitate economic activities throughout wayne county, ny including the location and expansion of civic, industrial and commercial…

Community Improvement
5
Cny Works Inc

To bring businesses, job seekers and training providers together to provide skilled workers for every business and employment for every job seeker.

—
6
Alfred Technology Resources Inc

To stimulate economic development in the southern tier region of ny, through support of the creation of innovative business start-ups and the jobs they create. this support is provided through its business incubator facilities and the…

Community Improvement
7
East Buffalo Development Corporation

East Buffalo Development Corporation is a community-based real estate development corporation committed to our mission of leveraging private and public funds to drive equitable and inclusive eastside planning, construction, land use, and…

Community Improvement
8
Erie County Economic Development Charitable Fund

To facilitate both the creation and retention of jobs within erie county and increase economic opportunities for individuals and businesses through comprehensive economic development programs.

—
9
Western New York Technology Development Center Inc

To transform our region by stimulating the growth and creation of dynamic companies in order to provide a superior standard of living for residents.

Science & Tech
10
Wyoming County Business Center Inc

The corporation's mission is to foster the creation, retention, and expansion of economic opportunities for the benefit of the state, county and local economies.

Philanthropy
11
Upstate Minority Economic Alliance Inc

Our mission is to establish a small, cooperative community in upstate & central new york where the most driven individuals can network, acquire and share priceless talents, and develop both personally and professionally. as a result, we…

Community Improvement
12
Fuzehub Inc

Fuzehub works to better connect new york's small and mid-sized manufacturing companies to the resources, programs and expertise they need for technology commercialization, innovative solutions and business growth.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Launch New York Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alive Well Ny Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
10/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

N F C DEVELOPMENT CORP: $235,000 · OtherN F C DEVELOPMENT CORPTHE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP DBA NORTHLAND WORKFORCE TRAINING CENTER: $100,000 · OtherTHE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP DBA NORTHLAND WO…DEVUPS CO (START UP GRIND): $42,500 · OtherDEVUPS CO (START UP GRIND)19 IDEAS INC: $42,500 · Other19 IDEAS INCGREY ZIFF LLC: $25,500 · OtherSOUTHERN TIER WEST DEVELOPMENT: $18,750 · Other+2 more: $21,250 · OtherUpstate Venture Connect Corporation: $100,000 · Community ImprovementUpstate Venture Conne…OLEAN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $47,600 · Community ImprovementOLEAN BUSINESS DEVELO…Michigan Street African American Heritage Corridor Commission Inc: $40,000 · Community ImprovementMichigan Street Afric…Broadway Market Management Inc: $35,000 · Community ImprovementBroadway Market Manag…THE NIAGARA ARTS AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $190,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NIAGARA ARTS A…Net Positive Inc: $57,500 · Human ServicesNet Positive …URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC: $42,500 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE …BOOTSECTOR: $34,000 · Human ServicesBOOTSECTORENDEAVOR WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $63,750 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $15,000 · EducationTHE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC: $35,410 · Recreation & SportsNEXTCORPS INC: $21,781 · Social Science
Other$485,500Community Improvement$222,600Arts & Culture$190,000Human Services$134,000Education$78,750Recreation & Sports$35,410Social Science$21,781

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUpstate Venture Connect Corporation: $100,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetOLEAN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $47,600 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTHE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC: $35,410 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBroadway Market Management Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetNEXTCORPS INC: $21,781 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo IncNY30.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · First Niagara Foundation · Rich Family Foundation · The Western New York Foundation · The John R Oishei Foundation · Independent Health Association Inc · United Way of Buffalo and Erie County · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · Northwest Charitable Foundation · Zemsky Family Foundation · James H Cummings Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Center for Regional Strategies Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Center for Regional Strategies Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Center for Regional Strategies Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Center for Regional Strategies Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Center for Regional Strategies’ filings →

    More from the funding graph