Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Illinois · Public charity

Ccim Institute

The mission of the CCIM INSTITUTE is to elevate our members to the highest levels of success in the commercial real estate profession.

$58k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Ccim Institute’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Education Foundation Of The Ccim Institute, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’21
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2023
$58,320
Largest grant, FY2023
$58,320
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$22M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Education$83k

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2023.

EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF THE CCIM INSTITUTE$58,320

Compare Ccim Institute with peer funders

About Ccim Institute

How much does Ccim Institute give?
Ccim Institute reported 1 grants totaling $58,320 in its FY2023 IRS filing.
What does Ccim Institute fund?
By grant dollars, its largest causes are Education (100%).
Where is Ccim Institute based?
Ccim Institute is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ccim Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home