Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Carson-Etheridge Foundationinc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$224kArts & Culture$55kHousing & Shelter$48kEnvironment$19kRecreation & Sports$13kAnimals$12kScience & Tech$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$876k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$20,000
LYNN HOUSE$10,000
WALTERS ART MUSEUM$7,000
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION$3,000
THE WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION (WHOI)$2,500
BRYN MAWR SCHOOL$2,500
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$2,250
IRVINE NATURE CENTER$2,000
MARYLAND SPCA$1,500
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$1,000
SAVE OUR SOUND$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JFK HYANNIS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%THE WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION (WHOI): $3k → 8%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $2k → 14%PINE VIEW ASSOCIATION INC: $7k → 9%LYNN HOUSE: $10k → 9%CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%BRYN MAWR SCHOOL: $3k → 19%JFK HYANNIS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $2k → 14%PINE VIEW ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 9%LYNN HOUSE: $10k → 9%CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%BRYN MAWR SCHOOL: $3k → 19%JFK HYANNIS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%PINE VIEW ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 9%LYNN HOUSE: $9k → 9%CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%IRVINE NATURE CENTER: $2k → 11%BRYN MAWR SCHOOL: $2k → 19%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%PINE VIEW ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 9%LYNN HOUSE: $8k → 9%IRVINE NATURE CENTER: $2k → 11%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%LYNN HOUSE: $7k → 9%MARYLAND SPCA: $2k → 19%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%MARYLAND SPCA: $2k → 19%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $18k → 16%KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA OF CORNELL FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 16%BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART: $2k → 19%BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART: $2k → 19%BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART: $2k → 19%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $2k → 19%WALTERS ART MUSEUM: $7k → 19%WALTERS ART MUSEUM: $7k → 19%WALTERS ART MUSEUM: $6k → 19%WALTERS ART MUSEUM: $6k → 19%WALTERS ART MUSEUM: $6k → 19%WALTERS ART MUSEUM: $4k → 19%WALTERS ART MUSEUM: $4k → 19%WALTERS ART MUSEUM: $4k → 19%WALTERS ART MUSEUM: $3k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 53% of The Carson-Etheridge Foundationinc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Carson-Etheridge Foundationinclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$374k · 17 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$374k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-11%

Still filing today

65%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Cornell University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $193k · revenue +59%
  • PV
    Pine View Association Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $14k · revenue +112%
  • SS
    SUNCOAST SPORTS CLUB INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • KK
    KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA OF CORNELL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -61%
  • JF
    JOHN F KENNEDY HYANNIS MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
The Coral Reef and Marine Science Foundation Inc C/O James Bildner
—
3
Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc

To protect the nature of massachusetts for people and for wildlife through education, land conservation, advocacy, scientific research, and habitat stewardship/restoration.

Environment
4
Maine Audubon Society

Maine Audubon works to conserve Maine's wildlife and habitat by engaging people of all ages in education, conservation, and action. We are helping the people of Maine become the nation's most informed and effective stewards of wildlife and…

Environment
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
7
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
8
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
9
Texas State Aquarium Association

The texas state aquarium's mission is engaging people with animals, inspiring appreciation for our seas, and supporting wildlife conservation. its vision is to be a global leader in fostering support for the conservation of the gulf of…

Animals
10
Clean Ocean Action Inc

Clean ocean action's goal is to improve and protect the waters off the new jersey/new york coast from pollution, plastics, industrialization and climate change with research, education and citizen action.

Environment
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Berea College; the most unlike its peers is Suncoast Sports Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cornell University: $192,500 · EducationCornell University+2 more: $5,500 · EducationLYNN HOUSE: $48,000 · OtherLYNN HOUSEWALTERS ART MUSEUM: $45,000 · OtherWALTERS ART MUSEUMPine View Association Inc: $13,900 · OtherPine View Association IncBRYN MAWR SCHOOL: $12,500 · OtherBRYN MAWR SCHOOLTHE WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION (WHOI): $4,500 · OtherJFK HYANNIS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Other+1 more: $1,750 · OtherCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $7,750 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $6,500 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $4,000 · EnvironmentALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC: $3,500 · EnvironmentIRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC: $3,500 · EnvironmentSUNCOAST SPORTS CLUB INC: $13,000 · Recreation & SportsBALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART: $4,500 · Arts & CultureJOHN F KENNEDY HYANNIS MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MARYLAND SPCA INC: $5,400 · Animals
Education$198,000Other$130,150Environment$25,250Recreation & Sports$13,000Arts & Culture$5,500Animals$5,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCornell University: $192,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPine View Association Inc: $13,900 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetSUNCOAST SPORTS CLUB INC: $13,000 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $7,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND SPCA INC: $5,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA OF CORNELL FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY HYANNIS MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds Pine View Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUNCOAST SPORTS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND SPCA INC ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC ↗
  • Who funds IRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA OF CORNELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY HYANNIS MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Carson-Etheridge Foundationinc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Carson-Etheridge Foundationinc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Baltimore Museum of Art: 4% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Carson-Etheridge Foundationinc?

Find your warmest path to The Carson-Etheridge Foundationinc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carson-Etheridge Foundationinc’s filings →

More from the funding graph