Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Carl and Lily Pforzheimer Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Public Benefit$30kArts & Culture$29kEducation$17kHuman Services$8kHealth$6kPhilanthropy$6k
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL CIVIC LEAGUE$15,000
ART BEYOND SIGHT$7,500
COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Includenyc: $3k → 17%INCLUDENYC: $3k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60k · 4 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +159% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$60k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+159%
+37%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL CIVIC LEAGUE
    4× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +159%
  • AB
    ART BEYOND SIGHT INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $18k · revenue +665%
  • RF
    RESOURCES FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $6k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • TP
    The Pierpont Morgan Librarygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +27%
  • AC
    AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEESgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +88%
  • HS
    HENRY STREET SETTLEMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
4
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
5
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
6
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
7
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
8
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
9
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science & Art

See schedule ovision: the cooper union for the advancement of science and art is dedicated to peter cooper's radical commitment to diversity and his founding vision that fair access to an inspiring free education and forums for courageous…

Education
10
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
11
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
12
New York Studio School

The new york studio school is committed to giving a significant education to the aspiring artist, a preamble to a lifetime's engagement in drawing, painting, and sculpture. (see schedule o for continuation)

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henry Street Settlement; the most unlike its peers is The Pierpont Morgan Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ART BEYOND SIGHT INC: $17,500 · OtherART BEYOND SIGHT INCCOLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC: $7,500 · OtherCOLLEGE OF THE ATLANTICRIO ABAJO COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $4,800 · OtherRIO ABAJO COMMUNITY LIBRARYNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC: $2,500 · OtherNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INCNATIONAL CIVIC LEAGUE: $30,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL CIVIC LEAGUEThe Pierpont Morgan Library: $10,000 · EducationThe Pierpont Morg…AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $5,000 · EducationAMHERST COLLEGE T…RESOURCES FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesRESOURCES FOR…HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $5,000 · Human ServicesHENRY STREET …CANDID: $6,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PAPER BAG PLAYERS INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$32,300Community Improvement$30,000Education$15,000Human Services$11,000Philanthropy$6,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL CIVIC LEAGUE: $30,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetART BEYOND SIGHT INC: $17,500 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetThe Pierpont Morgan Library: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESOURCES FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANDID: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PAPER BAG PLAYERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Carl and Lily Pforzheimer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Carl and Lily Pforzheimer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Carl and Lily Pforzheimer Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Carl and Lily Pforzheimer Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carl and Lily Pforzheimer’s filings →

More from the funding graph