Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Carine and Jacques Dubois Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$575k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$946kHuman Services$790kArts & Culture$615kHealth$455kSocial Science$360kFood & Nutrition$175kEducation$165kPhilanthropy$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $550k
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA DE LUZ$200,000
WESTSIDE GERMAN SHEPHARD RESCUE$175,000
MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER$100,000
MAYO CLINIC$75,000
HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOL$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Food Depot: $30k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
NV
WY
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NM
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 98% of The Carine and Jacques Dubois Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 22% of the giving stays in NV; by stated purpose, 0%.

The Carine and Jacques Dubois Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 8 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$3.4M
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+39%

Still filing today

63%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePublic BenefitHuman ServicesReligionEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CASA DE LUZ
    6× · 2020–2025 · $790k · revenue +290%
  • MR
    MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $600k · revenue +7%
  • The Rand Corporation
    4× · 2017–2020 · $360k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • THE FOOD DEPOTgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +84%
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +39%
  • NT
    NEWNAN THEATRE COMPANY
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Mexico Community Development Loan Fund Inc

See schedule othe loan fund was formed to encourage and facilitate the investment of capital in low-income new mexico communities through individuals, religious and community organizations, foundations, government entities, lending…

—
2
Northern New Mexicans Protecting Land Water and Rights Inc

Northern new mexicans protecting land water and rights strives to lessen the stress of neighborhood tensions due to lack of information and fair representation. by providing an organization whose main goal is to unite and empower the…

—
3
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
4
Tmc Health Foundation

The tmc health foundation supports the charitable mission of tucson medical center and is dedicated to improving the health and quality of life in our community.

Health
5
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
6
Children's Cancer Fund of New Mexico

The children's cancer fund of new mexico exists to help persons from new mexico who have been diagnosed with and treated for childhood cancer (at a new mexico pediatric oncology facility) and their families cope with the day-to-day…

—
7
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
8
Gallup Community Health

Gallup community health's mission is to provide excellent and accessible medical care to our community, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
9
Cuenca Los Ojos

Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.

Environment
10
Moral Compass Federation Inc

Moral compass federation facilitates collaboration among multiple veteran-led nonprofit organizations, individuals, and businesses who came together during the fall of kabul, afghanistan to evacuate and resettle afghan allies who were in…

Public Benefit
11
National Multifamily Housing Council Inc

Nmhc provides leadership and advocacy that promotes thriving rental housing communities for all.

—
12
Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida Inc

To provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching, research, charity care and financial responsibility.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Food Depot. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTSIDE GERMAN SHEPHARD RESCUE: $936,000 · OtherWESTSIDE GERMAN SHEPHARD RESCUEMAYO CLINIC: $395,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICKITCHEN ANGELS INC: $145,000 · OtherKITCHEN ANGELS INCHOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $140,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOLMENTAL HEALTH & RECOVERY SERVICES OF JACKSON HOLE: $60,000 · Other+2 more: $18,000 · OtherCASA DE LUZ: $790,000 · ReligionCASA DE LUZMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $600,000 · Arts & CultureMEDIA RESEARCH CEN…The Rand Corporation: $360,000 · Public BenefitThe Rand Co…SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FOOD DEPOT: $30,000 · Human ServicesTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS: $25,000 · EducationNational Marine Mammal Foundation Inc: $10,000 · Animals
Other$1,694,000Religion$790,000Arts & Culture$600,000Public Benefit$360,000Philanthropy$100,000Human Services$30,000Education$25,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASA DE LUZ: $790,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $600,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $360,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKITCHEN ANGELS INC: $145,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH & RECOVERY SERVICES OF JACKSON HOLE: $60,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Marine Mammal Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASA DE LUZ ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
  • Who funds KITCHEN ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH & RECOVERY SERVICES OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS ↗
  • Who funds National Marine Mammal Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Carine and Jacques Dubois Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Carine and Jacques Dubois Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Carine and Jacques Dubois Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Carine and Jacques Dubois Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carine and Jacques Dubois Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph