Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$451k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$248k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$9.9MEducation$3.4MRecreation & Sports$132kScience & Tech$85kInternational$54k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$99,995
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$247,500
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$99,995
SAVE A CHILD'S HEART$53,689
PULMONARY VASCULAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 56% of grant dollars ($7.7M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 44% that went abroad ($6.0M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $48k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $115k → 15%BWH: $85k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $82k → 11%TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $251k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $74k → 8%CALIFORNIA NORTHSTATE UNIVERSITY: $104k → 12%RAHUL KUMAR: $58k → 19%NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE: $60k → 9%AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY: $35k → 17%TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER: $109k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $55k → 17%ASPEN LUNG CONFERENCE: $25k → 3%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $288k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $409k → 9%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $132k → 14%THE COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM: $54k → 12%PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION: $313k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $324k → 19%MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $48k → 11%BWH: $45k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $82k → 11%TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $244k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $62k → 8%CALIFORNIA NORTHSTATE UNIVERSITY: $55k → 12%RAHUL KUMAR: $23k → 19%NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE: $36k → 9%TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER: $54k → 20%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $244k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $389k → 9%NORTWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $132k → 14%THE COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM: $54k → 12%PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION: $313k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $100k → 19%BWH: $40k → 16%TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $184k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $59k → 8%CALIFORNIA NORTHSTATE UNIVERSITY: $49k → 12%TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER: $49k → 20%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $106k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $200k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $100k → 19%TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $180k → 22%BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JR UNI: $30k → 8%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $104k → 16%TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $70k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $27k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
AZ
AL
TX

Beyond the US: 44% of all-years giving ($6.0M)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$4.8M · 13 grants
Canada$851k · 8 grants
Spain$168k · 3 grants
Germany$105k · 3 grants
India$97k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of The Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education Fund Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education Fund Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 44% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 22 repeat orgs$458k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
10

Total granted

$12M
$405k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+121%

Still filing today

27%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VU
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    6× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +120%
  • TP
    THE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $625k · revenue +21%
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    4× · 2019–2022 · $415k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
    one grant, 2022 · $115k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA
    one grant, 2019 · $55k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO
    one grant, 2020 · $49k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
6
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
7
Emory University

Emory University's mission is to create, preserve, teach, and apply knowledge in the service of humanity. (See Schedule O for continuation)

Education
8
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
11
Upmc

Support of subsidiary tax-exempt healthcare, education and research organizations (see schedule o)

Health
12
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Medical College; the most unlike its peers is Aspen Lung Conference. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PULMONARY VASCULAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $4,773,782 · OtherPULMONARY VASCULAR RESEARCH INSTITUTEUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $998,284 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONIndiana University School of Medicine: $741,773 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineIndividual grant recipient: $600,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $523,799 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE+21 more: $2,136,075 · Other+21 moreVanderbilt University Medical Center: $1,255,047 · HealthVanderbilt Univ…THE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC: $625,000 · HealthTHE PULMONARY H…+2 more: $26,000 · HealthTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $927,191 · EducationTRUSTEES OF T…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $414,944 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL …THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $221,700 · EducationTHE BOARD OF …Midwestern University: $96,670 · EducationMidwestern Un…Northwestern University: $263,664 · Recreation & Sports
Other$9,774,213Health$1,906,047Education$1,660,505Recreation & Sports$263,664

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $1,255,047 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $927,191 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC: $625,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $414,944 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $263,664 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $221,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMidwestern University: $96,670 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE: $96,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN LUNG CONFERENCE: $25,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Midwestern University ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN LUNG CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph