Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Campbell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$277k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$407kHealth$230kEducation$150kCivil Rights$100kReligion$99kInternational$74kCrime & Legal$18kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $217k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
To Ukraine with Love$60,000
Horizons at Lexington Montessori$40,000
St Vincent de Paul$32,000
Intermountain Healthcare Foundation at Primary Chi$30,000
Neighborhood House$25,000
International Center of Law & Religion$20,000
Our Heart Worldwide$20,000
Catholic Community Services$20,000
Furnishing New Beginnings$20,000
Danielle Byron Henry Migraine Foundation$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $242k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%One Heart Worldwide: $20k → 11%Furnishing New Beginnings: $20k → 16%Our Heart Worldwide: $20k → 16%One Heart Worldwide: $20k → 11%Furnishing New Beginnings: $20k → 16%One Heart Worldwide: $20k → 11%Furnishing New Beginnings: $20k → 16%One Heart Worldwide: $20k → 11%Neighborhood House: $25k → 8%Neighborhood House: $15k → 8%Neighborhood House: $15k → 8%Neighborhood House: $10k → 8%Neighborhood House: $9k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $9k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 13 repeat orgs$303k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

$1.1M
$181k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+31%

Still filing today

54%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    Neighborhood House Association
    6× · 2020–2025 · $82k · revenue +50%
  • DC
    DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX
    5× · 2020–2024 · $79k · revenue +63%
  • DB
    Danielle Byron Henry Migraine Foundation
    4× · 2021–2025 · $28k · revenue +228%

Funded once

  • PC
    PRIMARY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDAT
    one grant, 2020 · $46k
  • HA
    HORIZONS AT LEXINGTON MONTESSORI SC
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW RELIGI
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Womens Global Health Network Inc

To promote health and education for women and children in the most underserved and difficult to reach places in the world.

Education
2
Sacred Valley Health

To promote health in the underserved rural communities of Peru's Sacred Valley.

International
3
Partner Haiti

To reduce childhood malnutrition in Haiti and provide people in rural areas access to life-saving medical care.

—
4
Global Health Promise

Advocate for and support women in sex work and their children.

Health
5
Feeding Hungry Families

The Organization supports programs that help needy families in third-world countries by providing food, clothing and medical care.

Religion
6
Healthy Mothers Healthy Babies the Montana Coalition Inc

Improve the Health safety and well-being of Montana families by supporting mothers and babies, age zero to three.

Health
7
Kirk Humanitarian
Philanthropy
8
One Utah Health Collaborative

The organization's purpose is focused on improving and advancing health care in utah to be more affordable, with better health outcomes by accelerating, enabling and promoting healthcare innovation.

Health
9
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
10
Healthy Ninos Honduras Inc

Healthy Ninos Honduras works for the health and wholeness of Honduran people, focusing on nutrition, wellness, hygiene, and education.

Food & Nutrition
11
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
12
Horizon Health and Wellness Inc

Horizon health and wellness inc's mission is to provide strength-based, culturally sensitive integrated health services by partnering with families and individuals to manage challenges and support their recovery. hhw developed an (cont'd…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Heart Worldwide; the most unlike its peers is Furnishing New Beginnings. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Orphanage Support Services: $140,000 · OtherOrphanage Support ServicesTo Ukraine with Love: $129,000 · OtherTo Ukraine with LoveHorizons at Lexington Montessori School: $120,000 · OtherHorizons at Lexington Montessori SchoolCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF UTAH: $110,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF UTAHIHC Primary Children's Hosipital: $105,335 · OtherIHC Primary Children's HosipitalInternational Center for Law and Studies: $80,000 · OtherInternational Center for Law and StudiesPRIMARY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDAT: $45,815 · OtherHorizons at Lexington Montessori: $40,000 · Other+12 more: $211,500 · Other+12 moreONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $100,000 · Human ServicesONE HEART WORLDWIDENeighborhood House Association: $82,000 · Human ServicesNeighborhood House A…FURNISHING NEW BEGINNINGS: $60,000 · Human ServicesFURNISHING NEW BEGIN…DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $79,264 · ReligionDanielle Byron Henry Migraine Foundation: $27,500 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthVitamin Bridge: $10,000 · HealthONE COMMON THREAD: $5,000 · InternationalBUILDING YOUTH AROUND THE WORLD: $4,000 · InternationalST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$981,650Human Services$242,000Religion$79,264Health$47,500International$9,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $100,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetNeighborhood House Association: $82,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $79,264 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFURNISHING NEW BEGINNINGS: $60,000 over 3y, 82% of budgetDanielle Byron Henry Migraine Foundation: $27,500 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE UTAH: $18,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVitamin Bridge: $10,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetONE COMMON THREAD: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDING YOUTH AROUND THE WORLD: $4,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKEOGH HEALTH CONNECTION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONE HEART WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood House Association ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds FURNISHING NEW BEGINNINGS ↗
  • Who funds Danielle Byron Henry Migraine Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PREVENT CHILD ABUSE UTAH ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Vitamin Bridge ↗
  • Who funds ONE COMMON THREAD ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING YOUTH AROUND THE WORLD ↗
  • Who funds KEOGH HEALTH CONNECTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ashton Family FoundationUT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ashton Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Campbell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Campbell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Campbell Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Campbell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Campbell Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph