Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cambridge Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
87
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$128kHealth$113kHuman Services$99kEducation$85kFood & Nutrition$32kRecreation & Sports$31kPhilanthropy$31kHousing & Shelter$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 87 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k86 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
$50
Median grant
15
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUKE'S WINGS$21,940
JEFFERSON COUNTY LITTLE LEAGUE$4,000
TENCO FOUNDATION INC$2,500
1ST FRIDAYS ART WALK OF FAIRFIELD INC$2,500
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA$2,500
FRIENDS OF SBL$2,500
DUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH & AGING$2,000
MAIN STREET FAIRFIELD$2,000
FOOD BANK OF IOWA$1,500
WILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER$1,000
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION$1,000
GREATER CLERMONT CANCER FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CARRY ON BAGS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%3RD DECADE INC: $500 → 15%YWCA DELAWARE: $50 → 10%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $50 → 7%RAISING HOPE INC: $1k → 10%WILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $1k → 14%AUSTIN DIAPER BANK: $1k → 10%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $8k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%VALORFIT: $50 → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 9%CAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA: $800 → 11%TRICITY FAMILY SERVICES: $50 → 8%KESSLER FOUNDATION: $50 → 4%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%LOAVES AND FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50 → 7%LOAVES AND FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50 → 7%TRAIL OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $50 → 15%LOAVES AND FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50 → 7%BLUE ISLAND CITIZENS FOR PERSONS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES INC: $100 → 14%FOUNDATION FOR FINANCIAL PLANNING: $10k → 14%LOAVES AND FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50 → 7%FOUNDATION FOR FINANCIAL PLANNING: $10k → 14%ALL GOD'S CREATURES: $50 → 12%LOAVES AND FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50 → 7%FOUNDATION FOR FINANCIAL PLANNING: $10k → 14%LOAVES AND FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50 → 7%LOAVES AND FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50 → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 10%COMMUNITY CHILD CARE CENTER: $4k → 14%CENTER ON HALSTED: $500 → 14%JEFFERSON COUNTY AGENCY ON AGING: $500 → 14%JEFFERSON COUNTY AGENCY ON AGING: $350 → 14%THE AFRICAN VIOLET FOUNDATION: $317 → 14%THE AFRICAN VIOLET FOUNDATION: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$353k · 94 repeat orgs$338k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

94 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 67 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

94
175

Total granted

$353k
$293k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+12%

Still filing today

60%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR FINANCIAL PLANNING INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +99%
  • MI
    MAHARISHI INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +17%
  • TW
    THE WELL RESOURCE CENTER
    2× · 2020–2022 · $13k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • NH
    NEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $36k · revenue -16%
  • JT
    JORDAN THOMAS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue +12%
  • II
    INVEST IN OTHERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +224%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
10
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
11
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tenderloin Tessie Holiday Dinners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

185 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 185 of the 302 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
181/185
Grantees still filing
117/185
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $19,225 · OtherCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING1ST FRIDAYS ART WALK OF FAIRFIELD INC: $14,646 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,368 · OtherMAHARISHI UNIV OF MGMT: $10,000 · OtherKIDS MATTER INTERNATIONAL: $15,285 · Other+131 more: $179,997 · Other+131 moreNEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC: $35,540 · HealthNEW HOPE FOR KIDS …JORDAN THOMAS FOUNDATION INC: $35,125 · HealthJORDAN THOMAS FOUN…LUKE'S WINGS: $21,940 · HealthLUKE'S WINGSTHE WELL RESOURCE CENTER: $12,500 · HealthTHE WELL RESOURCE …+12 more: $8,721 · Health+12 moreFairfield Arts & Convention Center Inc: $100,050 · Recreation & SportsFairfield Arts & …THE FAIRFIELD PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Recreation & Sports+3 more: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsMAHARISHI INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationMAHARISHI…Food For Thought Denver: $19,945 · EducationFood For …WARTBURG COLLEGE: $2,700 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $2,500 · EducationEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF FAIRFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $2,500 · Education+12 more: $10,800 · Education+12 moreFOUNDATION FOR FINANCIAL PLANNING INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $7,675 · Human ServicesCommunity Childcare Center Inc: $3,743 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,630 · Human Services+11 more: $8,517 · Human ServicesINVEST IN OTHERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WAPELLO COUNTY INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyFAIRFIELD PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $626 · PhilanthropyURBAN PEAK DENVER: $17,000 · Housing & ShelterGREATER FAIRFIELD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,500 · Housing & ShelterWHATSOEVER YOU DO INC: $1,500 · Housing & ShelterBETHANY HOUSE OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY INC: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $200 · Housing & Shelter
Other$299,521Health$113,826Recreation & Sports$108,050Education$58,445Human Services$52,565Philanthropy$27,626Housing & Shelter$25,200

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFairfield Arts & Convention Center Inc: $100,050 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetNEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC: $35,540 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetJORDAN THOMAS FOUNDATION INC: $35,125 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR FINANCIAL PLANNING INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetINVEST IN OTHERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMAHARISHI INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFood For Thought Denver: $19,945 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetURBAN PEAK DENVER: $17,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS MATTER INTERNATIONAL: $15,285 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE WELL RESOURCE CENTER: $12,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetIOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER FAIRFIELD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCommunity Childcare Center Inc: $3,743 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWARTBURG COLLEGE: $2,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,630 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $2,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF FAIRFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTENCO FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS IOWA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRICHLAND COMMUNITY CLUB INC: $2,500 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetDUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH & AGING INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,905 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,601 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST IOWA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION SOUTHEAST IOWA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMAZEWORKS: $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWHATSOEVER YOU DO INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,310 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSINGING CEDARS SCHOOL INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FLOATS HEALING & WELLNESS CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Clermont Cancer Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WAPELLO COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAUSTIN DIAPER BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWPORT BEACH JUNIOR LIFEGUARD FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMUSCATINE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBETHANY HOUSE OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCreighton University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEMENTIA SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRINCE OF PEACE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAdoption Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fairfield Arts & Convention Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds JORDAN THOMAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR FINANCIAL PLANNING INC ↗
  • Who funds INVEST IN OTHERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUKE'S WINGS ↗
  • Who funds MAHARISHI INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Food For Thought Denver ↗
  • Who funds URBAN PEAK DENVER ↗
  • Who funds KIDS MATTER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE WELL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds IOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER FAIRFIELD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAIRFIELD PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Community Childcare Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds WARTBURG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Jefferson County FoundationIA42.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Jefferson County Foundation · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Ottumwa Regional Legacy Foundation Inc · Washington County Riverboat Foundation Inc · GreenState Credit Union · David L Lieb Foundation Inc · Rpc Inc Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of Johnson County · Carmax Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cambridge Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cambridge Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Kessler Foundation Inc: 54% of income from government
  • Ywca Delaware Inc: 50% of income from government
  • Christopher Reeve Foundation: 49% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
41report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Cambridge Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Cambridge Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 302 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cambridge’s filings →

More from the funding graph