· Public charity
The Bwana's Club Inc Dba Dsc South Tex
To conserve wildlife and wilderness lands; to educate youth and the general public and to promote and protect the rights and interest of hunters worldwide.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $97,655 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $108,655 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k8 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DSC FOUNDATION | $42,155 |
| CONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| ADAM CLEMENTS SAFARI | $10,000 |
| TEXAS BIGHORN SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| OPERATION GAME THIEF | $5,000 |
| MULE DEER FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| TEXAS BRIGADES | $5,000 |
| CROSS TRAIL OUTFITTERS | $5,000 |
| HUNTERS FOR THE HUNGRY | $2,500 |
| CONSERVATION FORCE | $2,000 |
| DISABLED OUTDOORSMEN USA | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DFDSC FOUNDATION INC2× · 2019–2020 · $65k · revenue -15%
- CSCONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S FOUNDATION2× · 2019–2020 · $45k · revenue +34%
- CFCONSERVATION FORCE INC2× · 2019–2020 · $32k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- DSDALLAS SAFARI CLUBgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +416%
- OOOPERATION ORPHANS INCone grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -17%
- TOTRINITY OAKS ENTERPRISESone grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation (TPWF) is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization thatadvances Texas proud outdoor traditions through meaningful, high-impact programs,partnerships, and a wide range of projects that conserve and enhance our…
Fish and wildlife conservation and outreach including public awareness. Fifteen public relations campaign on social media with over 7.5 million impressions. Twenty plus speaking engagements to a variety of conservation organizations…
Protecting texas wildlife, habitats, property rights, hunting heritage, and conservation.
To protect the rights of hunters and the hunting heritage through advocacy, policy, and legislation.
The organizations mission is to help preserve, maintain and restore upland game habitat throughout the southwest region of the United States and to improve the quail population in Texas.
The mission of the organization is to educate the public and outdoorsmen about wildlife and wildlife conservation and to raise funds for conservation grants.
Preserving the sport of hunting through education, conservation, and the promotion of our hunting heritage.
To support texas land trusts and promote land conservation efforts in texas. host texas land conservation conference to educate conservation related professionals and volunteers from across the state.
To support the rights of law-abiding Texans to own, enjoy, and use firearms; to support junior education, competition, and hunter education programs; to declare a champion in the various
Working togther to produce good fruit by reaching outdoors into god's creation.
The Museum was organized to distribute educational information and data on animals of the world; and provide a channel for organized efforts to promote a public understanding and acceptance of sport hunting as an effective tool for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Safari Club and the most unlike its peers is Trinity University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DSC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds CROSS TRAIL OUTFITTERS OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS SAFARI CLUB ↗
- Who funds TEXAS BIGHORN SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Bobwhite Brigade ↗
- Who funds OPERATION GAME THIEF ↗
- Who funds FEEDING TEXAS ↗
- Who funds OPERATION ORPHANS INC ↗
- Who funds TRINITY OAKS ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds Trinity University ↗
- Who funds DISABLED OUTDOORSMEN USA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dsc Foundation Inc · Dallas Safari Club · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Bwana's Club Inc Dba Dsc South Tex funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Bwana's Club Inc Dba Dsc South Tex?
Find your warmest path to The Bwana's Club Inc Dba Dsc South Tex through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.